Literature DB >> 17919692

Identification of early p53 mutations in clam ileocystoplasties using restriction site mutation assay.

Kenneth D Ivil1, Spencer A Jenkins, Shareen H Doak, Azad M Hawizy, Howard G Kynaston, Elizabeth M Parry, Gareth J S Jenkins, James M Parry, Timothy P Stephenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Because a risk of cancer arising in enterocystoplasties exists, it is necessary to identify which patients are most at risk of tumor formation. The aim of this study was to determine whether rare mutated p53 sequences were more common at the enterovesical anastomosis than in the bladder remnant in patients with a clam ileocystoplasty using the restriction site mutation (RSM) assay.
METHODS: DNA was extracted from endoscopic biopsies obtained from the ileovesical anastomosis and native bladder remnant (control specimens) of 38 patients with a clam ileocystoplasty. The RSM assay was used to study five known hotspots for mutations of the p53 gene using the restriction enzymes Hha I (codon 175), Taq I (codon 213), Hae III (codon 249/250), and Msp I (codons 248 and 282). The mutational events of p53 were confirmed by sequencing the undigested mutated polymerase chain reaction products identified by RSM analysis.
RESULTS: We found p53 mutations at the ileovesical anastomosis in 7 of the 38 patients. The mutations were observed at codon 213 (n = 1), codon 248 (n = 3), and codon 250 (n = 3). No p53 mutations were detected in any control specimen.
CONCLUSIONS: The ileovesical anastomosis is genetically unstable in patients with a clam ileocystoplasty. The p53 mutations identified by the RSM assay at the enterovesical anastomosis could possibly be used as markers of genetic instability to identify patients at risk of developing a tumor. Prospective, randomized longitudinal studies are required to substantiate this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919692     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Increased cancer risk of augmentation cystoplasty: possible role for hyperosmolal microenvironment on DNA damage recognition.

Authors:  Bradley P Dixon; Albert Chu; Jeff Henry; Rebecca Kim; John J Bissler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Cell cycle control and DNA damage response of conditionally immortalized urothelial cells.

Authors:  Bradley P Dixon; Jeff Henry; Brian J Siroky; Albert Chu; Pamela A Groen; John J Bissler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Transition to adulthood with a bladder augmentation: histopathologic concerns.

Authors:  Emil Mammadov; Sergulen Dervisoglu; Mehmet Elicevik; Haluk Emir; Yunus Soylet; S N Cenk Buyukunal
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Adenocarcinoma arising in sigmoid colon neovagina 53 years after construction.

Authors:  Kazunosuke Yamada; Dai Shida; Tomoyasu Kato; Hiroshi Yoshida; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Yukihide Kanemitsu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Invasive poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty: a multi-institutional clinicopathological study.

Authors:  Joshua A Anderson; Andres Matoso; Belkiss I Murati Amador; Liang Cheng; Bradley A Stohr; Emily Chan; Adeboye O Osunkoya
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 5.335

6.  Adenoma-carcinoma Sequence in the Bladder After Augmentation Cystoplasty.

Authors:  Akihiro Naito; Taketo Kawai; Tetsuya Fujimura; Teppei Morikawa; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2014-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.