Literature DB >> 32951908

Invasive poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty: a multi-institutional clinicopathological study.

Joshua A Anderson1, Andres Matoso2, Belkiss I Murati Amador2, Liang Cheng3, Bradley A Stohr4, Emily Chan4, Adeboye O Osunkoya5.   

Abstract

Augmentation cystoplasty is a surgical procedure used in the management of patients with neurogenic bladder. This procedure involves anastomosis of the bladder with gastrointestinal grafts, including portions of ileum, colon, or stomach. A rare but important complication of augmentation cystoplasty is the development of malignancy. The majority of malignancies arising in this setting have been described in case reports. A search for cases of non-urothelial carcinoma following augmentation cystoplasty was conducted through the urological pathology files of four major academic institutions. Ten cases were identified, including six cystoprostatectomy/cystectomy, two partial cystectomy, and two transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimens. The mean patient age at diagnosis was 47 years (range 27-87 years). The male:female ratio was 4:6. The tumours tended to present at an advanced stage; four cystoprostatectomy/cystectomy cases were categorised as pT3a, one was categorised as pT3b, and one was categorised as pT4a. Lymph node metastases were present in all cases which had lymph node excision (range 1-16 positive nodes per case). The majority of cases (90%) were predominantly characterised by a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features. Other morphological features included mucinous features (30%), plasmacytoid features (20%), enteric/villous architecture (10%), and large cell undifferentiated morphology (10%). This is the largest study to date on the clinicopathological features of invasive non-urothelial carcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty. The tumours are typically poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, with diffuse signet ring cell features, aggressive, and present at high stage. Further molecular characterisation may provide additional insights into the pathogenesis of this entity.
Copyright © 2020 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; augmentation cystoplasty; bladder; poorly differentiated; signet-ring cells

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32951908      PMCID: PMC9281534          DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2020.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.335


  16 in total

1.  Anaplastic signet ring cell carcinoma arising in gastrocystoplasty.

Authors:  Dilek Ertoy Baydar; Robert W Allan; Miguel Castellan; Andrew Labbie; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The role of N-nitrosamine in carcinogenesis at the ureterocolic anastomosis.

Authors:  M Stewart; M J Hill; R C Pugh; J P Williams
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1981-04

Review 3.  Bladder Augmentation (Enterocystoplasty): the Current State of a Historic Operation.

Authors:  Jeffrey Budzyn; Hamilton Trinh; Samantha Raffee; Humphrey Atiemo
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Risk of malignancy after augmentation cystoplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Xavier Biardeau; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Morgan Rouprêt; Véronique Phé
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Augmentation cystoplasty and risk of neoplasia: fact, fiction and controversy.

Authors:  T T Higuchi; C F Granberg; J A Fox; D A Husmann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Chronic inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Emily Shacter; Sigmund A Weitzman
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood.

Authors:  Douglas A Husmann
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-04

8.  Histological findings after colocystoplasty and gastrocystoplasty.

Authors:  P Vajda; L Kaiser; T Magyarlaki; A Farkas; A M Vastyan; A B Pinter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Long-term follow up of enteric bladder augmentations: the risk for malignancy.

Authors:  D A Husmann; S R Rathbun
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 1.830

10.  Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation on biopsies from clam ileocystoplasties and on a clam cancer.

Authors:  K D Ivil; S H Doak; S A Jenkins; E M Parry; H G Kynaston; J M Parry; T P Stephenson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Secondary malignancy after urologic reconstruction procedures: a multi-institutional case series.

Authors:  Chelsea Cornell; Francesca Khani; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Andres Matoso; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Safia N Salaria; Giovanna A Giannico
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.466

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.