Literature DB >> 17919594

Treatment options and allograft use in revision total hip arthroplasty the acetabulum.

Shawn M Brubaker1, Thomas E Brown, Abhijit Manaswi, William M Mihalko, Quanjun Cui, Khaled J Saleh.   

Abstract

One of the most challenging aspects of revision total hip arthroplasty is management of bone loss. The acetabulum is particularly difficult, with its complex morphology and proximity to major neurovascular structures. We present a reliable classification system of pelvic and acetabular bone loss based on preoperative radiographs, and this classification system directs treatment of bone loss. The type and application of allograft bone required for the reconstruction will be reviewed for each level of bone loss. Good ability to prognosticate each level of treatment is available from follow-up studies based on survival. We know of no other scientifically developed and validated classification of pelvic bone loss that predicts the likely success of the applied treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919594     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Giachino; Paolo Bedino; Danilo Mellano; Raimondo Piana; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The biological acetabular reconstruction with bone allografts in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  L Busanelli; F Castagnini; B Bordini; S Stea; P P Calderoni; A Toni
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-16

3.  Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  L Gaiani; R Bertelli; Massimo Palmonari; G Vicenzi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29

4.  Acetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Siva Swaminathan Santhanam; Jung Woo Choi
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Mid-Term Outcomes of Cemented or Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Failed Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Following Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Tao Huang; Shi Zhang; Xinhang Liu; Gang Lv; Heng Huang; Shuxin Wang; Mingdong Zhao; Min Xiong; Weiguang Yu; Qiuxia Cheng; Ting Huang
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-10-06

6.  Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?

Authors:  Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Alexandre Maris Yonamine; Carlos Eduardo Nunes Faria; Marco Rudelli
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-06-27

7.  Impaction technique influences implant stability in low-density bone model.

Authors:  Ruben Doyle; Richard J van Arkel; Sarah Muirhead-Allwood; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Patient-specific Three-dimensional Bone Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Orthopedic Diseases of the Hip: Opinions of Orthopedic Surgeons on New Medical Technology.

Authors:  Seung-Won Choi; Kyung-Soon Park; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-06-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.