Literature DB >> 17919568

Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicts ventricular response after resynchronization therapy.

John Gorcsan1, Masaki Tanabe, Gabe B Bleeker, Matthew S Suffoletto, Nini C Thomas, Samir Saba, Laurens F Tops, Martin J Schalij, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a combined echocardiographic assessment of longitudinal dyssynchrony by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and radial dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking strain may predict left ventricular (LV) functional response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
BACKGROUND: Mechanical LV dyssynchrony is associated with response to CRT; however, complex patterns may exist.
METHODS: We studied 190 heart failure patients (ejection fraction [EF] 23 +/- 6%, QRS duration 168 +/- 27 ms) before and after CRT. Longitudinal dyssynchrony was assessed by color TDI for time to peak velocity (2 sites in all and 12 sites in a subgroup of 67). Radial dyssynchrony was assessed by speckle-tracking radial strain. The LV response was defined as > or =15% increase in EF.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients (93%) had technically sufficient baseline and follow-up data available. Overall, 34% were EF nonresponders at 6 +/- 3 months after CRT. When both longitudinal dyssynchrony by 2-site TDI (> or =60 ms) and radial dyssynchrony (> or =130 ms) were positive, 95% of patients had an EF response; when both were negative, 21% had an EF response (p < 0.001 vs. both positive). The EF response rate was lowest (10%) when dyssynchrony was negative using 12-site TDI and radial strain (p < 0.001 vs. both positive). When either longitudinal or radial dyssynchrony was positive (but not both), 59% had an EF response. Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicted EF response with 88% sensitivity and 80% specificity, which was significantly better than either technique alone (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined patterns of longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony can be predictive of LV functional response after CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919568     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  71 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac ultrasound imaging in heart failure: recent advances.

Authors:  Umar A Khan; Gerard P Aurigemma
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-06

2.  Acute and chronic response to CRT in narrow QRS patients.

Authors:  Tim Donahue; Imran Niazi; Angel Leon; Michael Stucky; Keith Herrmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Increasing knowledge and changing views in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Laszlo Buga; John G F Cleland
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Echocardiography, dyssynchrony, and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; John E Sanderson; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: a review of the REVERSE and MADIT-CRT trials.

Authors:  Carl R Reynolds; Michael R Gold
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Impact of scar burden by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Evan C Adelstein; Hidekazu Tanaka; Prem Soman; Glen Miske; Stephanie C Haberman; Samir F Saba; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Relationship of echocardiographic dyssynchrony to long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Gorcsan; Olusegun Oyenuga; Phillip J Habib; Hidekazu Tanaka; Evan C Adelstein; Hideyuki Hara; Dennis M McNamara; Samir Saba
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS.

Authors:  Johannes Holzmeister; David Hürlimann; Jan Steffel; Frank Ruschitzka
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-03

Review 9.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Impact of mechanical activation, scar, and electrical timing on cardiac resynchronization therapy response and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick; Sujith Kuruvilla; Yasmin S Hamirani; Raghav Ramachandran; Samantha A Clarke; Katherine M Parker; George J Stukenborg; Pamela Mason; John D Ferguson; J Randall Moorman; Rohit Malhotra; J Michael Mangrum; Andrew E Darby; John Dimarco; Jeffrey W Holmes; Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.