Literature DB >> 17918075

Fluoroquinolone use and risk factors for Clostridium difficile-associated disease within a Veterans Administration health care system.

Lynne V McFarland1, Jill E Clarridge, Henry W Beneda, Gregory J Raugi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prompted by the changing profile of Clostridium difficile infection and the impact of formulary policies in hospitals, we performed this study when an increase in the incidence of C. difficile-associated disease was noted at our health care center (Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington).
METHODS: A retrospective, matched case-control study of patients presenting to the Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington during 2004 was performed. Conditional logistic analysis determined risk factors for case patients, defined as individuals with diarrhea and test results (i.e., culture or toxin assay results) positive for C. difficile, and control subjects, defined as individuals with diarrhea and test results negative for C. difficile.
RESULTS: C. difficile-associated disease incidence was 29.2 cases per 10,000 inpatient-days. The increase in the incidence of C. difficile-associated diarrhea that paralleled increased gatifloxacin use was not attributable to use of the antimicrobial but was a reflection of seasonal variation in the rate of C. difficile-associated disease. Multivariate analysis controlling for the time at which the assay was performed, the age of the patient, ward, and source of acquisition (community-acquired vs. nosocomial disease) found 6 significant risk factors for C. difficile-associated diarrhea: receipt of clindamycin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 29.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.58-249.4), receipt of penicillin (aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-13.9), having a lower intestinal condition (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-6.1), total number of antibiotics received (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), number of prior hospital admissions (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6), and number of comorbid conditions (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5).
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the number of cases of C. difficile-associated disease was not attributable to a formulary change of fluoroquinolones; instead, the incidence was within expected seasonal variations for C. difficile-associated disease. Recognition of community-acquired cases and the use of culture may help to identify additional cases of C. difficile-associated disease. Early diagnosis and treatment of C. difficile cases may shorten the duration of hospital stays and reduce the number of outbreaks and readmissions, mortality, and other consequences of C. difficile infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17918075     DOI: 10.1086/522187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  38 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in the ICU: the struggle continues.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Quasiexperimental study of the effects of antibiotic use, gastric acid-suppressive agents, and infection control practices on the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Mamoon A Aldeyab; Stephan Harbarth; Nathalie Vernaz; Mary P Kearney; Michael G Scott; Chris Funston; Karen Savage; Denise Kelly; Motasem A Aldiab; James C McElnay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Clostridium difficile infection in the community: are proton pump inhibitors to blame?

Authors:  Daniel E Freedberg; Julian A Abrams
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Prevalence and genotypic characteristics of Clostridium difficile in a closed and integrated human and swine population.

Authors:  Keri N Norman; H Morgan Scott; Roger B Harvey; Bo Norby; Michael E Hume; Kathleen Andrews
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  J Freeman; M P Bauer; S D Baines; J Corver; W N Fawley; B Goorhuis; E J Kuijper; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Treating Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota transplantation.

Authors:  Johan S Bakken; Thomas Borody; Lawrence J Brandt; Joel V Brill; Daniel C Demarco; Marc Alaric Franzos; Colleen Kelly; Alexander Khoruts; Thomas Louie; Lawrence P Martinelli; Thomas A Moore; George Russell; Christina Surawicz
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Effects of ciprofloxacin on the expression and production of exotoxins by Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Michael John Aldape; Aaron Eugene Packham; Drew William Nute; Amy Evelyn Bryant; Dennis Leroy Stevens
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Assessing the Risk of Hospital-Acquired Clostridium Difficile Infection With Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Vanessa Arriola; Jessica Tischendorf; Jackson Musuuza; Anna Barker; Jeffrey W Rozelle; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Community-Acquired Clostridium Difficile Infection: Awareness and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Cheryl Juneau; Elnora Nonie P Mendias; Nihas Wagal; Michael Loeffelholz; Tor Savidge; Sharon Croisant; Sara Dann
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.767

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.