Literature DB >> 17917807

Benign breast disease heterogeneity: association with histopathology, age, and ethnicity.

Jingfang Cheng1, Shijing Qiu, Usha Raju, Sandra R Wolman, Maria J Worsham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Benign breast biopsies with concurrent multiple benign lesions with different histopathologic diagnoses were termed heterogeneous benign breast disease (HBBD). Multiplicity of benign breast disease (BBD) lesions in a biopsy is a risk factor for progression to breast cancer (BC). Elucidation of the biological characteristics and clinical implications of HBBD may also be relevant to the refinement of risks for BC in women with a BBD diagnosis.
DESIGN: In this study, we investigated the association of HBBD with histopathology, age, and ethnicity. A cohort of 4,341 women, 1,208 African Americans and 3,133 Caucasians, diagnosed with BBD, was identified after examination of an excisional breast biopsy. BBD biopsies were categorized as nonproliferative (NP, low risk or risk 1 lesions), proliferative without atypia (P, intermediate risk or risk 2 lesions), and proliferative with atypia (AH, high risk or risk 3 lesions). A BBD biopsy with only a single BBD lesion was termed simple BBD (SBBD). BBD biopsies with multiple lesions were further classified as single level HBBD (SL-HBBD) if the concurrent lesions were within the same risk level, or as multiple level HBBD (ML-HBBD) if lesions fell into more than one risk group.
RESULTS: In this cohort, 69% of women with a BBD diagnosis fit the HBBD criteria. Among women with HBBD, ML-HBBD was almost three times more prevalent than SL-HBBD and was significantly more likely to be composed of risk 2 and risk 3 lesions. The likelihood of HBBD was 57% higher in Caucasian American women than in African American women with BBD (OR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.37, 1.81). The average lesion number in HBBD was directly proportional to increasing lesion risk (P < 0.001). Compared to women with risk 1 lesions, the likelihood of HBBD was 5.59 (95% CI: 4.85-6.44) and 17.0 (95% CI: 10.2-28.5) times higher when risk 2 and risk 3 lesions, respectively, were present. Women in the age range of 46-55 years and >55 years had a 3.12 (95% CI: 2.59, 3.75) and a 2.28 (95% CI: 1.94, 2.68) fold higher likelihood of HBBD compared to those < or =45 years. Significant interaction was found between concurrent lesion levels and age (P < 0.01). The likelihood of HBBD was considerably higher across all age groups for risk 3 lesions. Compared to the reference (risk 1, age < or =45), the likelihood of HBBD for risk 2 lesions was 4.4 times greater (95% CI: 3.70, 5.33) in women < or =45 YEARS, BUT THAT LIKELIHOOD INCREASED TO 17.6 (95% CI: 12.8, 24.2) AND 13.4 (95% CI: 10.1, 17.9) TIMES IN WOMEN OF 46-55 AND >55 YEARS, RESPECTIVELY.
CONCLUSION: HBBD is more prevalent in Caucasian American women than in African American women. Women with higher risk BBD lesions are more likely to have HBBD. Lesion number and higher risk BBD lesions are significantly correlated with ML-HBBD. Additionally, the associations of HBBD and lesion risk level are modified by age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17917807      PMCID: PMC3707617          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9775-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  32 in total

Review 1.  Histological and biological evolution of human premalignant breast disease.

Authors:  D C Allred; S K Mohsin; S A Fuqua
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 2.  Pathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: a review.

Authors:  M Kennedy; A V Masterson; M Kerin; F Flanagan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Pathologic features of breast cancers in women with previous benign breast disease.

Authors:  T W Jacobs; C Byrne; G Colditz; J L Connolly; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  Rating the risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Histopathologic types of benign breast lesions and the risk of breast cancer: case-control study.

Authors:  A M Shaaban; J P Sloane; C R West; F R Moore; C Jarvis; E M I Williams; C S Foster
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 6.  Use of MMTV-Wnt-1 transgenic mice for studying the genetic basis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Li; W P Hively; H E Varmus
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-02-21       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  A case-control study of risk factors for fibrocystic breast conditions: Shanghai Nutrition and Breast Disease Study, China, 1995-2000.

Authors:  Chunyuan Wu; Roberta M Ray; Ming Gang Lin; Dao Li Gao; Neilann K Horner; Zakia C Nelson; Johanna W Lampe; Yong Wei Hu; Jackilen Shannon; Helge Stalsberg; Wenjin Li; Dawn Fitzgibbons; Peggy Porter; Ruth E Patterson; Jessie A Satia; David B Thomas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Effects of tamoxifen on benign breast disease in women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Jiping Wang; Joseph P Costantino; Soonmyung Paik; Cheryl Butch; D Lawrence Wickerham; Bernard Fisher; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Ethnicity-related variation in breast cancer risk factors.

Authors:  Leslie Bernstein; Cayla R Teal; Sue Joslyn; Jerome Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Pathologic review of atypical hyperplasia identified by image-guided breast needle core biopsy. Correlation with excision specimen.

Authors:  I-Tien Yeh; Diana Dimitrov; Pamela Otto; Alexander R Miller; Morton S Kahlenberg; Anatolio Cruz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.534

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Centchroman on Regression of Fibroadenosis and Mastalgia.

Authors:  Udayakumar Rajswaroob; Rajendiran Kannan; Narayanasamy Subbaraju Kannan; T Tirouaroul
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

2.  Cell-based quantification of molecular biomarkers in histopathology specimens.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Kofahi; Wiem Lassoued; Kedar Grama; Sumit K Nath; Jianliang Zhu; Ridha Oueslati; Michael Feldman; William M F Lee; Badrinath Roysam
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  History of benign breast disease and risk of breast cancer among women in China: a case-control study.

Authors:  Tsogzolmaa Dorjgochoo; Sandra L Deming; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Lu; Ying Zheng; Zhixian Ruan; Wei Zheng; Xiao Ou Shu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Risk factors for breast cancer from benign breast disease in a diverse population.

Authors:  Maria J Worsham; Usha Raju; Mei Lu; Alissa Kapke; Alyssa Botttrell; Jingfang Cheng; Varsha Shah; Adnan Savera; Sandra R Wolman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Profile of Breast Diseases in Post Pubertal Women Assessed By Clinical Breast Examination - A Community Based Study in Rural Pondicherry.

Authors:  Kavasseri L Janaki; Narayanasamy Subbaraju Kannan; M Palaniappan; Partha Nandi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  Association Between Benign Breast Disease in African American and White American Women and Subsequent Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lisa A Newman; Azadeh Stark; Dhanajay Chitale; Margaret Pepe; Gary Longton; Maria J Worsham; S David Nathanson; Patricia Miller; Jessica M Bensenhaver; Erica Proctor; Monique Swain; Christos Patriotis; Paul F Engstrom
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Benign breast lesions in an African population: A 25-year histopathological review of 1864 cases.

Authors:  A N Olu-Eddo; Ezekiel Enoghama Ugiagbe
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2011-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.