Literature DB >> 17916893

Intracluster correlation coefficient in multicenter childhood trauma studies.

Bahman Roudsari1, Raymond Fowler, Avery Nathens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) for emergency department (ED) shock rate, early trauma death (ie, death during the first 24 h after arrival at hospital), and in-hospital trauma death rate for multicenter childhood injuries.
METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (5th revision), the largest multicenter trauma registry in the US, was used. Data from 80 trauma centers were used to calculate the ICC for in-hospital trauma death rate. Thirty three states provided data for calculation of the ICC for ED shock and early trauma death rate.
RESULTS: From 2000 to 2004, 13% of the 952 242 patients in the National Trauma Data Bank were <15 years old. Approximately 17 000 of these children had injuries with an injury severity score >15, of whom 84% (14 095 subjects) were hospitalized at 80 level I or II trauma centers in 33 states. The ICCs for ED shock rate, early trauma death rate, and in-hospital death rate were 0.005 (95% CI 0.000 to 0.010), 0.014 (95% CI 0.004 to 0.024), and 0.023 (95% CI 0.013 to 0.033), respectively. These ICCs were calculated for boys and girls and also for blunt and penetrating injuries.
CONCLUSION: Clustered childhood trauma studies that aim to compare different aspects of pre-hospital and hospital trauma care should incorporate these ICCs for sample calculation. When cluster randomized clinical trials are mounted, if sample sizes are calculated without adjustment for ICC, then the planned trial is likely to be seriously underpowered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17916893      PMCID: PMC2610624          DOI: 10.1136/ip.2007.015313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  28 in total

1.  The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.

Authors:  N B Baskerville; W Hogg; J Lemelin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Putting theory into practice: a cluster randomized trial with a small number of clusters.

Authors:  P L Yudkin; M Moher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Methodological considerations on the design and analysis of an equivalence stratified cluster randomization trial.

Authors:  G Piaggio; G Carroli; J Villar; A Pinol; L Bakketeig; P Lumbiganon; P Bergsjø; Y Al-Mazrou; H Ba'aqeel; J M Belizán; U Farnot; H Berendes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size.

Authors:  M K Campbell; J Mollison; J M Grimshaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Design and analysis issues in cluster-randomized trials of interventions against infectious diseases.

Authors:  R J Hayes; N D Alexander; S Bennett; S N Cousens
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Analysis of a cluster randomized trial with binary outcome data using a multi-level model.

Authors:  R Z Omar; S G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Cluster randomised trials in maternal and child health: implications for power and sample size.

Authors:  R Reading; I Harvey; M Mclean
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.

Authors:  A R Localio; J A Berlin; T R Ten Have; S E Kimmel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Sample size calculations for intervention trials in primary care randomizing by primary care group: an empirical illustration from one proposed intervention trial.

Authors:  S Eldridge; C Cryer; G Feder; M Underwood
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  International comparison of prehospital trauma care systems.

Authors:  Bahman S Roudsari; Avery B Nathens; Peter Cameron; Ian Civil; Russel L Gruen; Thomas D Koepsell; Fiona E Lecky; Rolf L Lefering; Moishe Liberman; Charles N Mock; Hans-Jörg Oestern; Thomas A Schildhauer; Christian Waydhas; Frederick P Rivara
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  What is the effect of a formalised trauma tertiary survey procedure on missed injury rates in multi-trauma patients? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gerben B Keijzers; Chris Del Mar; Leo M G Geeraedts; Joshua Byrnes; Elaine M Beller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Intra-cluster and inter-period correlation coefficients for cross-sectional cluster randomised controlled trials for type-2 diabetes in UK primary care.

Authors:  James Martin; Alan Girling; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Ronan Ryan; Tom Marshall; Karla Hemming
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.