Literature DB >> 10986541

Analysis of a cluster randomized trial with binary outcome data using a multi-level model.

R Z Omar1, S G Thompson.   

Abstract

The use of multi-level logistic regression models was explored for the analysis of data from a cluster randomized trial investigating whether a training programme for general practitioners' reception staff could improve women's attendance at breast screening. Twenty-six general practices were randomized with women nested within them, requiring a two-level model which allowed for between-practice variability. Comparisons were made with fixed effect (FE) and random effects (RE) cluster summary statistic methods, ordinary logistic regression and a marginal model based on generalized estimating equations with robust variance estimates. An FE summary statistic method and ordinary logistic regression considerably understated the variance of the intervention effect, thus overstating its statistical significance. The marginal model produced a higher statistical significance for the intervention effect compared to that obtained from the RE summary statistic method and the multi-level model. Because there was only a moderate number of practices and these had unbalanced cluster sizes, reliable asymptotic properties for the robust standard errors used in the marginal model may not have been achieved. While the RE summary statistic method cannot handle multiple covariates easily, marginal and multi-level models can do so. In contrast to multi-level models however, marginal models do not provide direct estimates of variance components, but treat these as nuisance parameters. Estimates of the variance components were of particular interest in this example. Additionally, parametric bootstrap methods within the multi-level model framework provide confidence intervals for these variance components, as well as a confidence interval for the effect of intervention which allows for the imprecision in the estimated variance components. The assumption of normality of the random effects can be checked, and the models extended to investigate multiple sources of variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986541     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001015)19:19<2675::aid-sim556>3.0.co;2-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of repeated cross-sectional cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Ian Roberts; Angie Wade; Mark Sculpher; Phil Edwards; Catherine Godward; Huiqi Pan; Suzanne Slater
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

3.  Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Sheng Wu; Catherine M Crespi; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peng Li; David T Redden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Fan Li; Elizabeth L Turner; Patrick J Heagerty; David M Murray; William M Vollmer; Elizabeth R DeLong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Multifaceted intervention to decrease the rate of severe postpartum haemorrhage: the PITHAGORE6 cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C Deneux-Tharaux; C Dupont; C Colin; M Rabilloud; S Touzet; J Lansac; T Harvey; V Tessier; C Chauleur; G Pennehouat; X Morin; M H Bouvier-Colle; R Rudigoz
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Group motivational intervention in overweight/obese patients in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the primary healthcare area.

Authors:  Juan José Rodríguez Cristóbal; Josefa Ma Panisello Royo; Carlos Alonso-Villaverde Grote; José Ma Pérez Santos; Anna Muñoz Lloret; Francisca Rodríguez Cortés; Pere Travé Mercadé; Francisca Benavides Márquez; Pilar Martí de la Morena; Ma José González Burgillos; Marta Delclós Baulies; Domingo Bleda Fernández; Elida Quillama Torres
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Intracluster correlation coefficient in multicenter childhood trauma studies.

Authors:  Bahman Roudsari; Raymond Fowler; Avery Nathens
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.399

9.  Using second-order generalized estimating equations to model heterogeneous intraclass correlation in cluster-randomized trials.

Authors:  Catherine M Crespi; Weng Kee Wong; Shiraz I Mishra
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).

Authors:  Jinhui Ma; Lehana Thabane; Janusz Kaczorowski; Larry Chambers; Lisa Dolovich; Tina Karwalajtys; Cheryl Levitt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.