Literature DB >> 17916663

Long-term outcome of low-risk patients attending a rapid-assessment chest pain clinic.

G L Taylor1, N F Murphy, C Berry, J Christie, A Finlayson, K MacIntyre, C Morrison, J McMurray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term outcome of patients evaluated in a rapid assessment chest pain clinic (RACPC): are "low-risk" patients safely reassured?
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Staff grade-led RACPC in an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 3378 patients (51% male), attending the RACPC between April 1996 and February 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death, coronary mortality, morbidity and revascularisation over a median follow-up of 6 years. Coronary standardised mortality ratio (SMR).
RESULTS: 2036 (60.3%) patients were categorised as "low risk", 957 (28.3%) as having "stable coronary artery disease" and 214 (6.3%) as being an "acute coronary syndrome". During the study, 3.6% of patients in the low risk category, 11.9% in the stable coronary artery disease category and 24.6% in the acute coronary syndrome category died from coronary artery disease or had a myocardial infarction. 5.5%, 18.2% and 18.4%, respectively, died from any cause. Compared to the local population (coronary SMR = 100), our "low risk/non-coronary chest pain" cohort had a coronary SMR of 51 (95% CI 31 to 83), the "stable coronary artery disease" cohort 240 (187 to 308) and the "acute coronary syndrome" cohort 780 (509 to 1196).
CONCLUSION: The RACPC was effective at triaging patients with chest pain. Patients identified as at "low risk" were unlikely to have an adverse coronary outcome and were appropriately reassured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17916663     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.125344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  5 in total

1.  Case definitions for acute myocardial infarction in administrative databases and their impact on in-hospital mortality rates.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Annabelle Neudam; Samantha Forde; Mingfu Liu; Saskia Drosler; Hude Quan; Nathalie Jetté
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  Neha Sekhri; Adam Timmis; Ruoling Chen; Cornelia Junghans; Niamh Walsh; M Justin Zaman; Justin Zaman; Sandra Eldridge; Harry Hemingway; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-24

Review 3.  Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim; Hwan Seok Yong; Sung Mok Kim; Jeong A Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Yoo Jin Hong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Non-coronary chest pain does not affect long-term mortality: a prospective, observational study using a matched population control.

Authors:  Staffan Nilsson; Petter Järemo
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools.

Authors:  Luis Ayerbe; Esteban González; Valentina Gallo; Claire L Coleman; Andrew Wragg; John Robson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.