Literature DB >> 17914458

Organization of sister origins and replisomes during multifork DNA replication in Escherichia coli.

Solveig Fossum1, Elliott Crooke, Kirsten Skarstad.   

Abstract

The replication period of Escherichia coli cells grown in rich medium lasts longer than one generation. Initiation thus occurs in the 'mother-' or 'grandmother generation'. Sister origins in such cells were found to be colocalized for an entire generation or more, whereas sister origins in slow-growing cells were colocalized for about 0.1-0.2 generations. The role of origin inactivation (sequestration) by the SeqA protein in origin colocalization was studied by comparing sequestration-deficient mutants with wild-type cells. Cells with mutant, non-sequesterable origins showed wild-type colocalization of sister origins. In contrast, cells unable to sequester new origins due to loss of SeqA, showed aberrant localization of origins indicating a lack of organization of new origins. In these cells, aberrant replisome organization was also found. These results suggest that correct organization of sister origins and sister replisomes is dependent on the binding of SeqA protein to newly formed DNA at the replication forks, but independent of origin sequestration. In agreement, in vitro experiments indicate that SeqA is capable of pairing newly replicated DNA molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17914458      PMCID: PMC2063475          DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  39 in total

Review 1.  The extrusion-capture model for chromosome partitioning in bacteria.

Authors:  K P Lemon; A D Grossman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  An analysis of the factory model for chromosome replication and segregation in bacteria.

Authors:  J Sawitzke; S Austin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Lack of SeqA focus formation, specific DNA binding and proper protein multimerization in the Escherichia coli sequestration mutant seqA2.

Authors:  Solveig Fossum; Sølvi Søreide; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Replication fork and SeqA focus distributions in Escherichia coli suggest a replication hyperstructure dependent on nucleotide metabolism.

Authors:  Felipe Molina; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 5.  Regulation of early events in chromosome replication.

Authors:  John F X Diffley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Bidirectional chromosome replication: some topological considerations.

Authors:  C W Dingman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Chromosome replication and the division cycle of Escherichia coli B/r.

Authors:  S Cooper; C E Helmstetter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1968-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Identification of a sex-factor-affinity site in E. coli as gamma delta.

Authors:  M S Guyer; R R Reed; J A Steitz; K B Low
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1981

9.  Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes.

Authors:  Ivy F Lau; Sergio R Filipe; Britta Søballe; Ole-Andreas Økstad; Francois-Xavier Barre; David J Sherratt
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Re-replication from non-sequesterable origins generates three-nucleoid cells which divide asymmetrically.

Authors:  Trond Bach; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  DNA motifs that sculpt the bacterial chromosome.

Authors:  Fabrice Touzain; Marie-Agnès Petit; Sophie Schbath; Meriem El Karoui
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Recycling of single-stranded DNA-binding protein by the bacterial replisome.

Authors:  Lisanne M Spenkelink; Jacob S Lewis; Slobodan Jergic; Zhi-Qiang Xu; Andrew Robinson; Nicholas E Dixon; Antoine M van Oijen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The relative ages of eukaryotes and akaryotes.

Authors:  David Penny; Lesley J Collins; Toni K Daly; Simon J Cox
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Rhodoccoccus erythropolis Is Different from Other Members of Actinobacteria: Monoploidy, Overlapping Replication Cycle, and Unique Segregation Pattern.

Authors:  Divya Singhi; Aashima Goyal; Gunjan Gupta; Aniruddh Yadav; Preeti Srivastava
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The Origin of Chromosomal Replication Is Asymmetrically Positioned on the Mycobacterial Nucleoid, and the Timing of Its Firing Depends on HupB.

Authors:  Joanna Hołówka; Damian Trojanowski; Mateusz Janczak; Dagmara Jakimowicz; Jolanta Zakrzewska-Czerwińska
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Lack of the H-NS Protein Results in Extended and Aberrantly Positioned DNA during Chromosome Replication and Segregation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Emily Helgesen; Solveig Fossum-Raunehaug; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Accelerating bacterial growth detection and antimicrobial susceptibility assessment in integrated picoliter droplet platform.

Authors:  Aniruddha M Kaushik; Kuangwen Hsieh; Liben Chen; Dong Jin Shin; Joseph C Liao; Tza-Huei Wang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 8.  Regulating DNA replication in bacteria.

Authors:  Kirsten Skarstad; Tsutomu Katayama
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Evidence for persistent and shared bacterial strains against a background of largely unique gut colonization in hospitalized premature infants.

Authors:  Tali Raveh-Sadka; Brian Firek; Itai Sharon; Robyn Baker; Christopher T Brown; Brian C Thomas; Michael J Morowitz; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  A reduction in ribonucleotide reductase activity slows down the chromosome replication fork but does not change its localization.

Authors:  Ingvild Odsbu; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.