Literature DB >> 17911498

PSA failure following definitive treatment of prostate cancer having biopsy Gleason score 7 with tertiary grade 5.

Abhijit A Patel1, Ming-Hui Chen, Andrew A Renshaw, Anthony V D'Amico.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In 2005, the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference recommended that men with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 or 4 + 3 prostate cancer and tertiary pattern 5 should have their cancer classified as Gleason score 8 or 9, respectively. Yet, the management of men with Gleason score 7 vs 8 or 9 prostate cancer differs.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic significance of Gleason score 7 with tertiary grade 5 vs other Gleason scores with respect to time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure in men with prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: From 1989 to 2005, 2370 men with clinical tumor category 1c to 3b, node-negative, and nonmetastatic prostate cancer underwent definitive therapy with surgery or radiation therapy with or without hormonal therapy. A pathologist with expertise in genitourinary cancers assigned Gleason scores to the prostate needle biopsy specimens. Cox regression was used to assess whether a significant association existed between the presence of tertiary grade 5 in men with Gleason score 7 disease and time to recurrence compared with men with Gleason score 7 without tertiary grade 5, Gleason score 5 to 6, or 8 to 10 disease, adjusting for known prognostic factors and treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time to PSA failure.
RESULTS: Men with Gleason score 7 and tertiary grade 5 disease had a significantly shorter time to PSA failure than men with 7 without tertiary grade 5 (median time, 5.0 vs 6.7 years, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.97; P = .04) or score of 6 or less (median time, 15.4 years; adjusted HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.43; P < .001). However, a significant difference was not observed when these men were compared with men with Gleason score 8 to 10 disease (median time, 5.1 years; adjusted HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.54-1.71; P = .90).
CONCLUSION: In this study population, men with prostate cancer having biopsy Gleason score 7 and tertiary grade 5 had a higher risk of PSA-failure when compared with men with Gleason score 7 without tertiary grade 5 and had a comparable risk with men with Gleason score 8 to 10.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911498     DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  12 in total

1.  Promoter hypermethylation of SOX11 correlates with adverse clinicopathological features of human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Apiwat Pugongchai; Andrey Bychkov; Pichet Sampatanukul
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Characteristics of modern Gleason 9/10 prostate adenocarcinoma: a single tertiary centre experience within the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; S Elamin; A Cahill; P Aherne; J White; J Buckley; K N O'Regan; A Brady; D G Power; M F O'Brien; P Sweeney; N Mayer; P J Kelly
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Current perspectives on Gleason grading of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Peter A Humphrey; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology.

Authors:  Jesse D Le; Samuel Stephenson; Michelle Brugger; David Y Lu; Patricia Lieu; Geoffrey A Sonn; Shyam Natarajan; Frederick J Dorey; Jiaoti Huang; Daniel J A Margolis; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Combinations of serum prostate-specific antigen and plasma expression levels of let-7c, miR-30c, miR-141, and miR-375 as potential better diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Darina Kachakova; Atanaska Mitkova; Elenko Popov; Ivan Popov; Alexandrina Vlahova; Tihomir Dikov; Svetlana Christova; Vanio Mitev; Chavdar Slavov; Radka Kaneva
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.311

7.  Impact of Gleason pattern 5 including tertiary pattern 5 on outcomes of salvage treatment for biochemical recurrence in pT2-3N0M0 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Satoru Taguchi; Kenshiro Shiraishi; Hiroshi Fukuhara; Keiichi Nakagawa; Teppei Morikawa; Akihiro Naito; Shigenori Kakutani; Yuta Takeshima; Hideyo Miyazaki; Tohru Nakagawa; Tetsuya Fujimura; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  The very-high-risk prostate cancer: a contemporary update.

Authors:  R Mano; J Eastham; O Yossepowitch
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Charles C Guo; Mark L Gonzalgo; Ahmed Magheli; Stacy Loeb; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Clinical significance of prospectively assigned Gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chirag Doshi; Michael Vacchio; Kristopher Attwood; Christine Murekeyisoni; Diana C Mehedint; Shervin Badkhshan; Gissou Azabdaftari; Norbert Sule; Khurshid A Guru; James L Mohler; Eric C Kauffman
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.