Literature DB >> 17911035

Comparative phylogeography of three skink species (Oligosoma moco, O. smithi, O. suteri; Reptilia: Scincidae) in northeastern New Zealand.

Kelly M Hare1, Charles H Daugherty, David G Chapple.   

Abstract

Sea-level fluctuations during the Pliocene and Pleistocene have shaped the landscape of the Northland region of New Zealand. We examined the comparative phylogeography of three skink species (Oligosoma moco, O. smithi, O. suteri) in northeastern New Zealand in order to investigate the impact of the historical processes that have prevailed since the Pliocene on the Northland fauna. O. moco, O. smithi and O. suteri have similar distributions across northeastern New Zealand, frequently occurring in sympatry. We obtained sequence data from across the entire range of each species, targeting the ND2 mitochondrial gene. Using Neighbor-Joining, Maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods, our analysis revealed contrasting phylogeographic patterns in each species. We found substantial phylogeographic structure within O. moco, with three distinct clades identified. Similarly, deep phylogeographic divergence was evident within O. smithi, with three distinct clades present. Clade 1 included O. smithi populations from the Three Kings Islands and the western coastline of Northland, while Clade 2 encompassed the remainder of the range. However, since Clade 3 corresponded to a described species (O. microlepis), O. smithi might represent a species complex. In both O. moco and O. smithi, divergences among clades are estimated to have occurred in the Pliocene, with divergences within clades occurring during the Pleistocene. In contrast, genetic divergence among O. suteri populations was extremely limited and indicative of more recent divergences during the Pleistocene. The lack of phylogeographic structure in O. suteri might be a consequence of its oviparous reproductive mode, which restricted its distribution to warm northern refugia during glacial maxima. Differences in the ecology and biology of each species might have produced contrasting responses to the same historical processes, and ultimately diverse phylogeographic patterns. Our study reveals an absence of consistent and concordant phylogeographic patterns in the Northland biota, even within the same taxonomic group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911035     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of New Zealand's terrestrial fauna: a review of molecular evidence.

Authors:  Julia Goldberg; Steven A Trewick; Adrian M Paterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The role of ecological factors in determining phylogeographic and population genetic structure of two sympatric island skinks (Plestiodon kishinouyei and P. stimpsonii).

Authors:  Kazuki Kurita; Mamoru Toda
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Comparative phylogeography of two closely related Viola species occurring in contrasting habitats in the Japanese archipelago.

Authors:  Hironori Toyama; Tetsukazu Yahara
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Phylogeography of the endangered Otago skink, Oligosoma otagense: population structure, hybridisation and genetic diversity in captive populations.

Authors:  David G Chapple; Alisha Birkett; Kimberly A Miller; Charles H Daugherty; Dianne M Gleeson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A retrospective approach to testing the DNA barcoding method.

Authors:  David G Chapple; Peter A Ritchie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic divergence between isolated populations of the North Island New Zealand Rifleman (Acanthisitta chloris granti) implicates ancient biogeographic impacts rather than recent habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  Sarah J Withers; Stuart Parsons; Mark E Hauber; Alistair Kendrick; Shane D Lavery
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.