Literature DB >> 19399576

Comparative phylogeography of two closely related Viola species occurring in contrasting habitats in the Japanese archipelago.

Hironori Toyama1, Tetsukazu Yahara.   

Abstract

Similar distribution ranges shared by closely related plant species may have been shaped through different migration histories if those species have differing habitat preference. To test this hypothesis, phylogeographical patterns and population genetic structures were compared between two sister Viola species: Viola eizanensis preferring woodland and V. chaerophylloides var. sieboldiana preferring grassland, both being native to the Japanese Archipelago. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was used for phylogenetic reconstruction, together with Bayesian ancestry analysis, AMOVA, analysis of genetic diversity statistics, and analysis of the relative contribution of each population to total diversity. The results indicated that V. eizanensis had two distinct lineages occurring in the western and eastern part of Japan, but such lineages are not distinct in V. chaerophylloides var. sieboldiana. Both species exhibited the low genetic diversity and high between-population differentiation typical of selfing plants. In V. chaerophylloides var. sieboldiana, one particular population made a significantly higher contribution to the total heterozygosity (H (T)), whereas in V. eizanensis, no population was identified as making a particularly higher contribution to H (T). These findings suggest that V. eizanensis had been isolated in two large glacial refugia, whereas populations of V. chaerophylloides var. sieboldiana were restricted to a single small refuge. Different light requirements between these two closely related species probably caused these differing responses to climatic change during the last ice age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19399576     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-009-0235-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  37 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The evolutionary processes of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes differ from those of nuclear genomes.

Authors:  Helena Korpelainen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-09-28

4.  How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies.

Authors:  A Bonin; E Bellemain; P Bronken Eidesen; F Pompanon; C Brochmann; P Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  AFLP analysis of the diversity and phylogeny of Lens and its comparison with RAPD analysis.

Authors:  S K Sharma; M R Knox; T H Ellis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe.

Authors:  P Taberlet; L Fumagalli; A G Wust-Saucy; J F Cosson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Comparative phylogeography of sympatric sister species, Clevelandia ios and Eucyclogobius newberryi (Teleostei, Gobiidae), across the California Transition Zone.

Authors:  M N Dawson; K D Louie; M Barlow; D K Jacobs; C C Swift
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  So close and so different: comparative phylogeography of two small mammal species, the yellow-necked fieldmouse (Apodemus flavicollis) and the woodmouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in the Western Palearctic region.

Authors:  J R Michaux; R Libois; M-G Filippucci
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  'What's larvae got to do with it?' Disparate patterns of post-glacial population structure in two benthic marine gastropods with identical dispersal potential.

Authors:  P B Marko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  6 in total

1.  Estimation of genetic diversity and evaluation of relatedness through molecular markers among medicinally important trees: Terminalia arjuna, T. chebula and T. bellerica.

Authors:  Maryam Sarwat; Sandip Das; Prem S Srivastava
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Phylogeography of Phytophagous Weevils and Plant Species in Broadleaved Evergreen Forests: A Congruent Genetic Gap between Western and Eastern Parts of Japan.

Authors:  Kyoko Aoki; Makoto Kato; Noriaki Murakami
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Independent allopatric polyploidizations shaped the geographical structure and initial stage of reproductive isolation in an allotetraploid fern, Lepisorus nigripes (Polypodiaceae).

Authors:  Tao Fujiwara; Yasuyuki Watano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Application of chloroplast genome in the identification of Traditional Chinese Medicine Viola philippica.

Authors:  Dong-Ling Cao; Xue-Jie Zhang; Shao-Qiu Xie; Shou-Jin Fan; Xiao-Jian Qu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.547

5.  Comparative phylogeographic study of Hosta sieboldiana and Hosta albomarginata (Asparagaceae) in Japan.

Authors:  Sangryong Lee; Masayuki Maki
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Long-term persisting hybrid swarm and geographic difference in hybridization pattern: genetic consequences of secondary contact between two Vincetoxicum species (Apocynaceae-Asclepiadoideae).

Authors:  Yue Li; Fumito Tada; Tadashi Yamashiro; Masayuki Maki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.