Literature DB >> 17910781

Organisational barriers to thrombolysis treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.

Lars Ehlers1, Lotte Groth Jensen, Merete A Bech, Grethe Andersen, Mette Kjølby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis with fibrinolytic drugs such as alteplase is not implemented widely in any country although the treatment is both effective and cost-effective in selected patients within a 3-h window after acute ischaemic stroke. The purpose of the present study was to describe the organisational barriers to delivery of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke with special regard to the Danish healthcare system.
METHOD: Systematic and unsystematic searches of medical, economic and grey literature on organisational barriers to thrombolysis treatment were performed in Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl, Econlit, NHS EED, SvedMed+ and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database. The search periods were 1996-2006.
FINDINGS: Three main types of literature on organisational barriers were found: medical literature including HTA reports on barriers related to the 3-h window, economic literature on barriers related to the lack of capacity to provide the treatment on a 24-h basis, and grey literature/policy papers on standards and demands to the hospitals and healthcare systems who implements the treatment.
CONCLUSION: Information on organisational barriers can be extracted from different types of literature (medical, economic and grey literature/policy papers), but organisational barriers are most often not the primary study objective in the relevant literature. This review showed a broad spectrum of possible organisational barriers to the delivery of thrombolysis treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17910781     DOI: 10.1185/030079907x242557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  5 in total

1.  Use of telemedicine and other strategies to increase the number of patients that may be treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Authors:  Gisele Sampaio Silva; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Health professionals' views on the barriers and enablers to evidence-based practice for acute stroke care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonard Baatiema; Michael E Otim; George Mnatzaganian; Ama de-Graft Aikins; Judith Coombes; Shawn Somerset
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Can a multicomponent multidisciplinary implementation package change physicians' and nurses' perceptions and practices regarding thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke? An exploratory analysis of a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Md Golam Hasnain; Christopher R Levi; Annika Ryan; Isobel J Hubbard; Alix Hall; Christopher Oldmeadow; Alice Grady; Amanda Jayakody; John R Attia; Christine L Paul
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  The progress of telestroke in China.

Authors:  Gang Zhao; Huan Huang; Fang Yang
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2017-06-29

5.  Staff perspectives from Australian hospitals seeking to improve implementation of thrombolysis care for acute stroke.

Authors:  Christine Paul; Catherine D'Este; Annika Ryan; Amanda Jayakody; John Attia; Christopher Oldmeadow; Erin Kerr; Frans Henskens; Alice Grady; Christopher R Levi
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-07-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.