Literature DB >> 17909775

Pain reduction in osteoporotic patients with vertebral pain without measurable compression.

Xinjian Yang1, Shijun Mi, Ankit A Mahadevia, Xin Lin, Wanchao Shi, Aihua Liu, Li Li, Zhongxue Wu, Kieran Murphy.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Non-compression osteoporotic vertebral pain (NCOVP) can also cause pain and severe immobilization, such as typical vertebral compression fracture (VCF). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with NCOVP refractory to medical treatment and severely affecting normal daily activities could be offered therapeutic benefit with percutaneous vertebroplasty.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the records of consecutive percutaneous vertebroplasty procedures performed at our institutions during a 28-month period to define a population of patients who suffered from severe NCOVP. Nine such patients were identified based on physical examination, computed tomography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and bone scans. Initial clinical outcomes were assessed by comparing quantitative measurements of pain (10-point scale) and mobility (5-point scale) 1 day before the operation with those 1 day post-operation. A second follow-up took place between 2 weeks and 1 month after the operation, with a third follow-up between 6 and 10 months post-operative. Biopsy was taken in each case.
RESULTS: Each patient demonstrated point tenderness over radiographically normal-shaped vertebra. Every patient showed a low signal on T1W images, and seven cases showed a high signal on T2W images inside the vertebra, indicating bone marrow edema. All patients experienced a reduction in pain and an increase in mobility after percutaneous vertebroplasty, with a mean pain reduction of 7.0 points and an average improved mobility of 2.8 points. Biopsy results indicated necrotic and/or degenerative changes in eight cases.
CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of our patients suggest that NCOVP, mainly verified by abnormal MR signals and biopsy results, can be successfully treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909775     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0311-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  18 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  J M Mathis; J D Barr; S M Belkoff; M S Barr; M E Jensen; H Deramond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of acute vertebral compressions: specific diagnosis of benign versus malignant pathologic fractures.

Authors:  D A Finelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  MR fluid sign in osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  William T C Yuh; Nina A Mayr; Kalliopi Petropoulou; Douglas P Beall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, technique, and results.

Authors:  Afshin Gangi; Stephane Guth; Jean Pierre Imbert; Horia Marin; Jean-Louis Dietemann
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results.

Authors:  J B Martin; B Jean; K Sugiu; D San Millán Ruíz; M Piotin; K Murphy; B Rüfenacht; M Muster; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  L Alvarez; A Pérez-Higueras; D Quiñones; E Calvo; R E Rossi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Midterm outcome after vertebroplasty: predictive value of technical and patient-related factors.

Authors:  Juerg Hodler; Dallas Peck; Louis A Gilula
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The therapeutic benefit of repeat percutaneous vertebroplasty at previously treated vertebral levels.

Authors:  John R Gaughen; Mary E Jensen; Patricia A Schweickert; William F Marx; David F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.

Authors:  L L Baker; S B Goodman; I Perkash; B Lane; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anita A Uppin; Joshua A Hirsch; Luis V Centenera; Bernard A Pfiefer; Artemis G Pazianos; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The broadening spectrum of osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Fergus Eoin McKiernan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Osteoporotic vertebral fractures without compression: key factors of diagnosis and initial outcome of treatment with cement augmentation.

Authors:  Haiqing Mao; Jun Zou; Dechun Geng; Xuesong Zhu; Mo Zhu; Weimin Jiang; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for multiple myeloma of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Francisco Mont'Alverne; Jean-Noel Vallée; Remy Guillevin; Evelyne Cormier; Betty Jean; Michelle Rose; José Guilherme Caldas; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Prediction of immediate and long-term benefit after kyphoplasty of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures by preoperative MRI.

Authors:  I A Grafe; G Nöldge; C Weiss; M Libicher; M Baier; P Nawroth; P-J Meeder; B Wiedenhöfer; C Kasperk
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.693

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.