Literature DB >> 17909447

Scala tympani cochleostomy II: topography and histology.

Oliver F Adunka1, Andreas Radeloff, Wolfgang K Gstoettner, Harold C Pillsbury, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess intracochlear trauma using two different round window-related cochleostomy techniques in human temporal bones.
METHODS: Twenty-eight human temporal bones were included in this study. In 21 specimens, cochleostomies were initiated inferior to the round window (RW) annulus. In seven bones, cochleostomies were drilled anterior-inferior to the RW annulus. Limited cochlear implant electrode insertions were performed in 19 bones. In each specimen, promontory anatomy and cochleostomy drilling were photographically documented. Basal cochlear damage was assessed histologically and electrode insertion properties were documented in implanted bones.
RESULTS: All implanted specimens showed clear scala tympani electrode placements regardless of cochleostomy technique. All 21 inferior cochleostomies were atraumatic. Anterior-inferior cochleostomies resulted in various degrees of intracochlear trauma in all seven bones.
CONCLUSION: For atraumatic opening of the scala tympani using a cochleostomy approach, initiation of drilling should proceed from inferior to the round window annulus, with gradual progression toward the undersurface of the lumen. While cochleostomies initiated anterior-inferior to the round window annulus resulted in scala tympani opening, many of these bones displayed varying degrees of intracochlear trauma that may result in hearing loss. When intracochlear drilling is avoided, the anterior bony margin of the cochleostomy remains a significant intracochlear impediment to in-line electrode insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909447     DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181453a53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  30 in total

1.  Rotation of the osseous spiral lamina from the hook region along the basal turn of the cochlea: results of a magnetic resonance image anatomical study using high-resolution DRIVE sequences.

Authors:  Daren Gibson; Michael B Gluth; Andy Whyte; Marcus D Atlas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Impact of the surgical experience on cochleostomy location: a comparative temporal bone study between endaural and posterior tympanotomy approaches for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Clair Vandersteen; Thomas Demarcy; Coralie Roger; Eric Fontas; Charles Raffaelli; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette; Nicolas Guevara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

4.  Clinical validation of percutaneous cochlear implant surgery: initial report.

Authors:  Robert Frederick Labadie; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Ramya Balachandran; Omid Majdani; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Automated insertion of preformed cochlear implant electrodes: evaluation of curling behaviour and insertion forces on an artificial cochlear model.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Andreas Hussong; Martin Leinung; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  A robot-guided minimally invasive approach for cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results of a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Stephan Baron; Hubertus Eilers; Claas Baier; Bodo Heimann; Tobias Ortmaier; Sönke Bartling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Cochleostomy placement and vestibular injury.

Authors:  Charley C Della Santina
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  [Insertion results for Contour™ and Contour Advance™ electrodes: are there individual learning curves?].

Authors:  A Aschendorff; T Klenzner; S Arndt; R Beck; C Schild; L Röddiger; W Maier; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Residual hearing preservation using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Christoph Arnoldner; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Dominik Riss; Jens Wagenblast; Clemens Honeder; Michaela Blineder; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi; Alexandra Jappel; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Marjan Mirsalehi; Saleh Mohebbi; Mahsa Ghajarzadeh; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.