Literature DB >> 17909414

Pedometer accuracy during walking over different surfaces.

Anthony S Leicht1, Robert G Crowther.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the effect of surface (concrete, grass, dry beach sand, wet beach sand) and gender on pedometer accuracy during walking.
METHODS: Fifty-two healthy university students volunteered for this study and completed six 150-m walking trials for each of the four different surfaces while wearing a YAMAX SW-700 Digiwalker pedometer. For each trial, time, number of steps taken and number of steps registered by the pedometer were recorded. These variables and pedometer accuracy for each walking surface and gender were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests.
RESULTS: Walking over dry beach sand significantly reduced walking speed (concrete, 5.6 +/- 0.5 km.h(-1); grass, 5.6 +/- 0.5 km.h(-1); dry beach sand, 5.0 +/- 0.5 km.h(-1): wet beach sand, 5.4 +/- 0.4 km.h(-1)) and increased the number of steps taken (concrete, 190 +/- 13; grass, 186 +/- 12; dry beach sand, 207 +/- 12; wet beach sand, 194 +/- 11) and registered (concrete, 195 +/- 14; grass, 191 +/- 14; dry beach sand, 213 +/- 15; wet beach sand, 201 +/- 16) by the pedometer compared with concrete and grass. Compared with males, females registered a greater number of pedometer steps (204 +/- 18 vs 197 +/- 15) and a greater absolute (9 +/- 12 vs 3 +/- 7 steps) and relative (4.46 +/- 5.72 vs 1.63 +/- 3.57%) pedometer error during walking over dry beach sand.
CONCLUSIONS: Walking on a soft surface such as dry beach sand significantly reduced walking speed and increased pedometer error for females compared with males, possibly by exacerbating hip and walking movements. Identification of gender and softer surfaces should be considered when documenting physical activity levels in field studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909414     DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181405b9f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  7 in total

1.  Commentaries on Viewpoint: Expending our physical activity (measurement) budget wisely.

Authors:  Todd M Manini
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-08

2.  These Shoes Are Made for Walking: Sensitivity Performance Evaluation of Commercial Activity Monitors under the Expected Conditions and Circumstances Required to Achieve the International Daily Step Goal of 10,000 Steps.

Authors:  Sandra O'Connell; Gearóid ÓLaighin; Lisa Kelly; Elaine Murphy; Sorcha Beirne; Niall Burke; Orlaith Kilgannon; Leo R Quinlan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of Commercial Self-Monitoring Devices for Clinical Purposes: Results from the Future Patient Trial, Phase I.

Authors:  Soren Leth; John Hansen; Olav W Nielsen; Birthe Dinesen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Outdoor Walking Speeds of Apparently Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elaine M Murtagh; Jacqueline L Mair; Elroy Aguiar; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Marie H Murphy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  A day at the beach: Does visually perceived distance depend on the energetic cost of walking?

Authors:  Brittany A Baxter; William H Warren
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Predictors of walking capacity in peripheral arterial disease patients.

Authors:  Breno Quintella Farah; João Paulo dos Anjos Souza Barbosa; Gabriel Grizzo Cucato; Marcel da Rocha Chehuen; Luis Alberto Gobbo; Nelson Wolosker; Cláudia Lúcia de Moraes Forjaz; Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Reliability and Validation of the Hexoskin Wearable Bio-Collection Device During Walking Conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Montes; John C Young; Richard Tandy; James W Navalta
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-10-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.