Literature DB >> 17907789

Analysis of DNA adducts formed in vivo in rats and mice from 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, dibromomethane, and dichloromethane using HPLC/accelerator mass spectrometry and relevance to risk estimates.

Kengo Watanabe1, Rosa G Liberman, Paul L Skipper, Steven R Tannenbaum, F Peter Guengerich.   

Abstract

Dihaloalkanes are of toxicological interest because of their high-volume use in industry and their abilities to cause tumors in rodents, particularly dichloromethane and 1,2-dichloroethane. The brominated analogues are not used as extensively but are known to produce more toxicity in some systems. Rats and mice were treated i.p. with (14)C-dichloromethane, -dibromomethane, -1,2-dichloroethane, or -1,2-dibromoethane [5 mg (kg body weight)(-1)], and livers and kidneys were collected to rapidly isolate DNA. The DNA was digested using a procedure designed to minimize processing time, because some of the potential dihalomethane-derived DNA-glutathione (GSH) adducts are known to be unstable, and the HPLC fractions corresponding to major adduct standards were separated and analyzed for (14)C using accelerator mass spectrometry. The level of liver or kidney S-[2-(N(7)-guanyl)ethyl]GSH in rats treated with 1,2-dibromoethane was approximately 1 adduct/10(5) DNA bases; in male or female mice, the level was approximately one-half of this. The levels of 1,2-dichloroethane adducts were 10-50-fold lower. None of four known (in vitro) GSH-DNA adducts was detected at a level of >2/10(8) DNA bases from dibromomethane or dichloromethane. These results provide parameters for risk assessment of these compounds: DNA binding occurs with 1,2-dichloroethane but is considerably less than from 1,2-dibromoethane in vivo, and low exposure to dihalomethanes does not produce appreciable DNA adduct levels in rat or mouse liver and kidney of the doses used. The results may be used to address issues in human risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17907789     DOI: 10.1021/tx700125p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  6 in total

Review 1.  Accelerator mass spectrometry-enabled studies: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Ali Arjomand
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Cytochrome P450 2E1 is responsible for the initiation of 1,2-dichloropropane-induced liver damage.

Authors:  Yukie Yanagiba; Tetsuya Suzuki; Megumi Suda; Rieko Hojo; Frank J Gonzalez; Tamie Nakajima; Rui-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.273

3.  Human microdosing for the prediction of patient response.

Authors:  Paul T Henderson; Chong-Xian Pan
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Research recommendations for selected IARC-classified agents.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Kurt Straif; Nancy B Hopf; Jane C Caldwell; Tania Carreón; David M DeMarini; Bruce A Fowler; Bernard D Goldstein; Kari Hemminki; Cynthia J Hines; Kirsti Husgafvel Pursiainen; Eileen Kuempel; Joellen Lewtas; Ruth M Lunn; Elsebeth Lynge; Damien M McElvenny; Hartwig Muhle; Tamie Nakajima; Larry W Robertson; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima M Ruder; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jack Siemiatycki; Debra Silverman; Martyn T Smith; Tom Sorahan; Kyle Steenland; Richard G Stevens; Paolo Vineis; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Lauren Zeise; Vincent J Cogliano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Single dose pharmacokinetics of oral tenofovir in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, colonic tissue, and vaginal tissue.

Authors:  Nicolette A Louissaint; Ying-Jun Cao; Paul L Skipper; Rosa G Liberman; Steven R Tannenbaum; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Jean R Anderson; Stephanie Everts; Rahul Bakshi; Edward J Fuchs; Craig W Hendrix
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.205

6.  Micronuclei in bone marrow and liver in relation to hepatic metabolism and antioxidant response due to coexposure to chloroform, dichloromethane, and toluene in the rat model.

Authors:  Javier Belmont-Díaz; Ana Paulina López-Gordillo; Eunice Molina Garduño; Luis Serrano-García; Elvia Coballase-Urrutia; Noemí Cárdenas-Rodríguez; Omar Arellano-Aguilar; Regina D Montero-Montoya
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.