Literature DB >> 1790749

Clinical evaluation of two non-contact tonometers.

S A Koopmans1, A C Kooijman, G van Rij, J Eisses, J de Groot-Woltjer.   

Abstract

The precision and speed of two non-contact tonometers were examined and compared. The Goldmann applanation tonometer was used as the standard for precision. On the average the results obtained with the non-contact tonometers were not significantly different from those obtained with the Goldmann tonometer. The variation in the values obtained with the non-contact tonometers was greater. The speed of measurement differed between the two non-contact tonometers.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1790749     DOI: 10.1007/bf00165689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pulsair tonometers.

Authors:  T A Armstrong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  A new tonometer system.

Authors:  B Grolman
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1972-08

3.  Clinical evaluation of the Topcon CT10 tonometer.

Authors:  C Verdoorn; A F Deutman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Airpuff tonometry versus applanation tonometry.

Authors:  O Lagerlöf
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1990-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.