Literature DB >> 17906896

Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes.

Paolo Pietro Bianchi1, Riccardo Rosati, Stefano Bona, Matteo Rottoli, Ugo Elmore, Chiara Ceriani, Alberto Malesci, Marco Montorsi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic resection in the management of rectal cancer is still controversial. We prospectively evaluated patient survival and outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer at a single institution.
METHODS: From November 1999 to November 2005, 107 patients with rectal cancer were treated by laparoscopy. Exclusion criteria were: metastatic disease, advanced disease with invasion of adjacent structures, clinical or radiologic involvement of the external anal sphincter, previous colonic resection, synchronous colonic adenocarcinoma, and contraindications to laparoscopy. All patients were followed prospectively for survival and complications. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A laparoscopic sphincter-saving procedure was performed in 104 patients, 2 patients had a laparoscopic Miles operation, and 1 underwent a laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure. Mean operating time was 278 (range, 135-430) minutes. Conversion to open surgery was required in 20 of 107 patients (18.7 percent). Overall morbidity was 27 percent, anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 of 104 patients (13.5 percent). There was no postoperative mortality. A mean of 18 (range, 1-49) lymph nodes was removed. Mean distance of distal margin from tumor was 2.6 (range, 0.5-10) cm; in two patients there was microscopic invasion of the distal margin. Mean hospital stay was nine (range, 4-43) days. Mean follow-up was 35.8 months. There was local recurrence in 1 of 107 patients (0.95 percent); there were no port site metastases. Actuarial five-year and disease-free survival rates are 81.4 and 79.8 percent, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectal surgery is feasible and oncologically radical but also technically demanding (conversion rate, 18.7 percent), time-consuming (mean operating time, 278 minutes), and associated with specific intraoperative complications. At present, the technique should only be performed in specialist centers by teams experienced in laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17906896     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9055-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  35 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000-2009.

Authors:  Tsukasa Hotta; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Pneumoperitoneum simulation based on mass-spring-damper models for laparoscopic surgical planning.

Authors:  Yukitaka Nimura; Jia Di Qu; Yuichiro Hayashi; Masahiro Oda; Takayuki Kitasaka; Makoto Hashizume; Kazunari Misawa; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-12-17

3.  Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Alessandra Perutelli; Matteo Palmeri; Simone Guadagni; Maria Donatella Mariniello; Gregorio Di Franco; Vito Cela; Benedetta Brundu; Maria Giovanna Salerno; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Laparoscopic proctectomy after neoadjuvant therapy: safety and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Molly M Cone; Kim C Lu; Daniel O Herzig; Jennifer D Rea; Brian S Diggs; Samuel C Oommen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Pham Nhu Hiep; Pham Anh Vu; Ho Huu Thien
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Feroci; Andrea Vannucchi; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Stefano Cantafio; Alessia Garzi; Giampaolo Formisano; Marco Scatizzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhen-Xu Zhou; Li-Ying Zhao; Tian Lin; Hao Liu; Hai-Jun Deng; Heng-Liang Zhu; Jun Yan; Guo-Xin Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  P P Bianchi; C Ceriani; A Locatelli; G Spinoglio; M G Zampino; A Sonzogni; C Crosta; B Andreoni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; S Biondo; E Espin; P Parrilla; H Ortiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Incidence and mortality of anastomotic dehiscence requiring reoperation after rectal carcinoma resection.

Authors:  Zhi-jie Cong; Liang-hao Hu; Jun-jie Xing; Zheng-qian Bian; Chuan-gang Fu; En-da Yu; Zhao-shen Li; Ming Zhong
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.