Literature DB >> 17906891

The effectiveness of asulam for bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) control in the United Kingdom: a meta-analysis.

Gavin B Stewart1, Andrew S Pullin, Claire Tyler.   

Abstract

Bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) is a major problem for livestock-based extensive agriculture, conservation, recreation, and game management globally. It is an invasive species often achieving dominance to the detriment of other species. Control is essential to maintain plant communities such as grassland and lowland heath or if extensive grazing by domestic stock, particularly sheep, is to be viable on upland margins. Bracken is managed primarily by herbicide application or cutting but other techniques including rolling, burning, and grazing are also utilized. Here we evaluate the evidence regarding the effectiveness of asulam for the control of bracken. Thirteen studies provided data for meta-analyses which demonstrate that application of the herbicide asulam reduces bracken abundance. Subgroup analyses indicate that the number of treatments had an important impact, with multiple follow-up treatments more effective than one or two treatments. Management practices should reflect the requirement for repeated follow-up. There is insufficient available experimental evidence for quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of other management interventions, although this results from lack of reporting in papers where cutting and comparisons of cutting and asulam application are concerned. Systematic searching and meta-analytical synthesis have effectively demonstrated the limits of current knowledge, based on recorded empirical evidence, and increasing the call for more rigorous monitoring of bracken control techniques. Lack of experimental evidence on the effectiveness of management such as rolling or grazing with hardy cattle breeds contrasts with the widespread acceptance of their use through dissemination of experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17906891     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0128-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  12 in total

1.  Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  S G Thompson; S J Sharp
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management.

Authors:  Andrew S Pullin; Gavin B Stewart
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  The need for evidence-based conservation.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Andrew S Pullin; Paul M Dolman; Teri M Knight
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Medical editors trial amnesty.

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

6.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

7.  Inter-study differences: how should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?

Authors:  K R Bailey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  The science of reviewing research.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-12-31       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 9.  Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated.

Authors:  S G Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-19

Review 10.  Effectiveness of management interventions to control invasion by Rhododendron ponticum.

Authors:  Claire Tyler; Andrew S Pullin; Gavin B Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.266

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effective control of aquatic invasive species in tropical Australia.

Authors:  Stephanie Januchowski-Hartley; Jeremy VanDerWal; Damon Sydes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Control of Pteridium aquilinum: meta-analysis of a multi-site study in the UK.

Authors:  Gavin Stewart; Emma Cox; Mike Le Duc; Robin Pakeman; Andrew Pullin; Rob Marrs
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions.

Authors:  Carly N Cook; Hugh P Possingham; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Do not neglect calcium: a systematic review and meta-analysis (meta-regression) of its digestibility and utilisation in growing and finishing pigs.

Authors:  Maciej M Misiura; João A N Filipe; Carrie L Walk; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.718

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.