Literature DB >> 16456628

Effectiveness of management interventions to control invasion by Rhododendron ponticum.

Claire Tyler1, Andrew S Pullin, Gavin B Stewart.   

Abstract

Rhododendron ponticum is an invasive species in many countries, including the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, and France. It poses a serious threat to native flora and fauna, as it is capable of altering entire seminatural communities through its vigorous spread. Control is essential if the conservation value of some communities, such as oak woodland and lowland heath, are to be successfully maintained. Commonly used interventions are herbicide application, herbicide application postcut, and cutting (manual or mechanical) alone. Various techniques have been developed to apply these interventions, but often retreatment of the area is required, increasing the cost of control. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of some commonly used interventions for R. ponticum control using a systematic review methodology. Eleven studies provided data for statistical analysis. Meta-analyses of captured data show that postcut application of the herbicide Glyphosate or applying the herbicides Metsulfuron-methyl or Imazapyr (no cut) can effectively reduce a R. ponticum stand. There is insufficient available experimental evidence for effectiveness of any other intervention. The systematic review process has demonstrated the lack of replicated studies with controls or long-term monitoring and increases the call for more rigorous monitoring of all conservation management interventions. The quality of experimental evidence of the effectiveness of some interventions contrasts with the acceptance of their use through dissemination of experience. The collection and objective review of experience will require active collaboration of organizations concerned with R. ponticum control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16456628     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0127-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  S G Thompson; S J Sharp
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions.

Authors:  M Petticrew
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

3.  The need for evidence-based conservation.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Andrew S Pullin; Paul M Dolman; Teri M Knight
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Origin and evolution of invasive naturalized material of Rhododendron ponticum L. in the British isles.

Authors:  R I Milne; R J Abbott
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Controlling Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz; Charles Perrings; Mark Williamson
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.789

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  The effectiveness of asulam for bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) control in the United Kingdom: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gavin B Stewart; Andrew S Pullin; Claire Tyler
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Heathlands confronting global change: drivers of biodiversity loss from past to future scenarios.

Authors:  Jaime Fagúndez
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions.

Authors:  Carly N Cook; Hugh P Possingham; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.560

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.