Literature DB >> 17906012

Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.

Catherine Y Spong1, Mark B Landon, Sharon Gilbert, Dwight J Rouse, Kenneth J Leveno, Michael W Varner, Atef H Moawad, Hyagriv N Simhan, Margaret Harper, Ronald J Wapner, Yoram Sorokin, Menachem Miodovnik, Marshall Carpenter, Alan M Peaceman, Mary J O'Sullivan, Baha M Sibai, Oded Langer, John M Thorp, Susan M Ramin, Brian M Mercer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current information on the risk of uterine rupture after cesarean delivery has generally compared the risk after trial of labor to that occurring with an elective cesarean delivery without labor. Because antepartum counseling cannot account for whether a woman will develop an indication requiring a repeat cesarean delivery or whether labor will occur before scheduled cesarean delivery, the purpose of this analysis was to provide clinically useful information regarding the risks of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome for women at term with a history of prior cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Women with a term singleton gestation and prior cesarean delivery were studied over 4 years at 19 centers. For this analysis, outcomes from five groups were studied: trial of labor, elective repeat with no labor, elective repeat with labor (women presenting in early labor who subsequently underwent cesarean delivery), indicated repeat with labor, and indicated repeat without labor. All cases of uterine rupture were reviewed centrally to assure accuracy of diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 39,117 women were studied. In term pregnant women with a prior cesarean delivery, the overall risk for uterine rupture was 0.32% (125 of 39,117), and the overall risk for serious adverse perinatal outcome (stillbirth, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal death) was 106 of 39,049 (0.27%). The uterine rupture risk for indicated repeat cesarean delivery (labor or without labor) was 7 of 6,080 (0.12%); the risk for elective (no indication) repeat cesarean delivery (labor or without labor) was 4 of 17,714 (0.02%). Indicated repeat cesarean delivery increased the risk of uterine rupture by a factor of 5 (odds ratio 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.49-17.44). In the absence of an indication, the presence of labor also increased the risk of uterine rupture (4 of 2,721 [0.15%] compared with 0 of 14,993, P<.01). The highest rate of uterine rupture occurred in women undergoing trial of labor (0.74%, 114 of 15,323).
CONCLUSION: At term, the risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome for women with a singleton and prior cesarean delivery is low regardless of mode of delivery, occurring in 3 per 1,000 women. Maternal complications occurred in 3-8% of women within the five delivery groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17906012     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  27 in total

1.  Clinical indications and determinants of the rise of cesarean section in three hospitals in rural China.

Authors:  Cheng Qin; Min Zhou; William M Callaghan; Samuel F Posner; Jun Zhang; Cynthia J Berg; Gengli Zhao
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-10

Review 2.  Elective cesarean section: its impact on neonatal respiratory outcome.

Authors:  Ashwin Ramachandrappa; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Jayapriya Jayakumaran; Sejal D Patel; Bhushan K Gangrade; Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Soundarya Ramanatha Pandian; Celso Silva
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-02-14

4.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes: a cost analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Robinson; Margaret S Villers; Donna D Johnson; Kit N Simpson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Examining the effect of maternal obesity on outcome of labor induction in patients with preeclampsia.

Authors:  Christopher J Robinson; Elizabeth G Hill; Mark C Alanis; Eugene Y Chang; Donna D Johnson; Jonas S Almeida
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.108

6.  Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Karen B Eden; Nicole Marshall; Leonardo Pereira; Aaron B Caughey; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.430

7.  Cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort.

Authors:  Sharon A Gilbert; William A Grobman; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Ravi M Patel; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.300

9.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and maternal perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Lifetime cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after cesarean in the United States.

Authors:  Sharon A Gilbert; William A Grobman; Mark B Landon; Michael W Varner; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Baha M Sibai; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.