Brian Quinn1, Syed Hussain, Muhammad Malik, Karl Drlica, Xilin Zhao. 1. Public Health Research Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, 225 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antimutant activity of antimicrobials can be estimated by comparing drug pharmacokinetics with mutant prevention concentration (MPC). Large bacterial inocula known to reduce susceptibility have not been studied for effects on MPC determination. METHODS: Staphylococcus aureus inoculum size was varied with solid and liquid media containing daptomycin and Ca(2+), a cation expected to lower inoculum effects, to assess effects on MIC and MPC. RESULTS: With drug-containing agar, individual colonies were obtained over a narrow range of inoculum size that shifted to higher inoculum size as daptomycin concentration increased. Increasing Ca(2+) supplementation from 1 to 50 mM lowered MIC by 2-fold and MPC from 20 to 3 mg/L, the latter determined by extrapolation of population analysis profiles to an inoculum size of 10(10) cfu. Cells of colonies recovered from daptomycin-containing agar had wild-type MIC. With liquid medium, supplemented with 1 mM Ca(2+)and containing 10(10) cfu, MPC was between 2.5 and 5 mg/L at an inoculum density of 10(7) cfu/mL. Bacteria recovered from liquid assays exhibited a 4- to 8-fold increase in MIC and contained point mutations in mprF. CONCLUSIONS: Inoculum effects on MPC can be reduced by measurement with low-density (large volume) liquid bacterial cultures. Retesting putative mutants for susceptibility can be important: stable mutants having genetic variations in the mprF gene were recovered from liquid medium, but not from agar. Daptomycin MPC with S. aureus was below minimal plasma drug concentration with approved doses, which is consistent with resistance to daptomycin arising rarely.
BACKGROUND: Antimutant activity of antimicrobials can be estimated by comparing drug pharmacokinetics with mutant prevention concentration (MPC). Large bacterial inocula known to reduce susceptibility have not been studied for effects on MPC determination. METHODS:Staphylococcus aureus inoculum size was varied with solid and liquid media containing daptomycin and Ca(2+), a cation expected to lower inoculum effects, to assess effects on MIC and MPC. RESULTS: With drug-containing agar, individual colonies were obtained over a narrow range of inoculum size that shifted to higher inoculum size as daptomycin concentration increased. Increasing Ca(2+) supplementation from 1 to 50 mM lowered MIC by 2-fold and MPC from 20 to 3 mg/L, the latter determined by extrapolation of population analysis profiles to an inoculum size of 10(10) cfu. Cells of colonies recovered from daptomycin-containing agar had wild-type MIC. With liquid medium, supplemented with 1 mM Ca(2+)and containing 10(10) cfu, MPC was between 2.5 and 5 mg/L at an inoculum density of 10(7) cfu/mL. Bacteria recovered from liquid assays exhibited a 4- to 8-fold increase in MIC and contained point mutations in mprF. CONCLUSIONS: Inoculum effects on MPC can be reduced by measurement with low-density (large volume) liquid bacterial cultures. Retesting putative mutants for susceptibility can be important: stable mutants having genetic variations in the mprF gene were recovered from liquid medium, but not from agar. Daptomycin MPC with S. aureus was below minimal plasma drug concentration with approved doses, which is consistent with resistance to daptomycin arising rarely.
Authors: C Garrigós; O Murillo; G Euba; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; J Ariza Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Adrien Fischer; Soo-Jin Yang; Arnold S Bayer; Ali R Vaezzadeh; Sébastien Herzig; Ludwig Stenz; Myriam Girard; George Sakoulas; Alexander Scherl; Michael R Yeaman; Richard A Proctor; Jacques Schrenzel; Patrice François Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: O Gasch; S K Pillai; J Dakos; S Miyakis; R C Moellering; G M Eliopoulos Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kelli L Palmer; Anu Daniel; Crystal Hardy; Jared Silverman; Michael S Gilmore Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: O Murillo; C Garrigós; M E Pachón; G Euba; R Verdaguer; C Cabellos; J Cabo; F Gudiol; J Ariza Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Bailey W Miller; Albebson L Lim; Zhenjian Lin; Jeannie Bailey; Kari L Aoyagi; Mark A Fisher; Louis R Barrows; Colin Manoil; Eric W Schmidt; Margo G Haygood Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Karl Drlica; Hiroshi Hiasa; Robert Kerns; Muhammad Malik; Arkady Mustaev; Xilin Zhao Journal: Curr Top Med Chem Date: 2009 Impact factor: 3.295