Literature DB >> 17905435

Vaccination of mice with recombinant baculovirus expressing spike or nucleocapsid protein of SARS-like coronavirus generates humoral and cellular immune responses.

Bingke Bai1, Xinya Lu, Jin Meng, Qinxue Hu, Panyong Mao, Baojing Lu, Ze Chen, Zhiming Yuan, Hanzhong Wang.   

Abstract

Continuous efforts have been made to develop a prophylactic vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). In this study, two recombinant baculoviruses, vAc-N and vAc-S, were constructed, which contained the mammalian-cell activate promoter element, human elongation factor 1alpha-subunit (EF-1alpha), the human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early promoter, and the nucleocapsid (N) or spike (S) gene of bat SARS-like CoV (SL-CoV) under the control of the CMV promoter. Mice were subcutaneously and intraperitoneally injected with recombinant baculovirus, and both humoral and cellular immune responses were induced in the vaccinated groups. The secretion level of IFN-gamma was much higher than that of IL-4 in vAc-N or vAc-S immunized groups, suggesting a strong Th1 bias towards cellular immune responses. Additionally, a marked increase of CD4 T cell immune responses and high levels of anti-SARS-CoV humoral responses were also detected in the vAc-N or vAc-S immunized groups. In contrast, there were significantly weaker cellular immune responses, as well as less antibody production than in the control groups. Our data demonstrates that the recombinant baculovirus can serve as an effective vaccine strategy. In addition, because effective SARS vaccines should act to not only prevent the reemergence of SARS-CoV, but also to provide cross-protection against SL-CoV, findings in this study may have implications for developing such cross-protective vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17905435      PMCID: PMC7112626          DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Immunol        ISSN: 0161-5890            Impact factor:   4.407


Introduction

Baculovirus (autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus, AcMNPV) expression systems have been widely used for producing recombinant proteins in insect cells (Hou et al., 2003, Li et al., 2003, Luckow and Summers, 1988, Miller, 1988, Ren et al., 2001), due to the high levels of expression and proper post-translational modification (Jones and Morikawa, 1996, Nakhai et al., 1991, Sridhar et al., 1994). In addition, baculoviruses can be efficiently taken up by mammalian cells without viral replication (Carbonell et al., 1985, Tjia et al., 1983, Volkman and Goldsmith, 1983). Modified AcMNPVs can express exogenous genes in mammalian cells (Boyce and Bucher, 1996, Delaney and Isom, 1998, Duisit et al., 1999, Hofmann et al., 1995, Shoji et al., 1997) when they contain promoters that are active in mammalian cells, such as Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter and cytomegalovirus immediate-early (CMV-IE) promoter. For instance, AcMNPV-containing CMV-IE promoter can infect human hepatocytes and result in high-level expression of luciferase (Hofmann et al., 1995). Since it is safe, efficient, and gene delivery-specific, the use of baculoviruses may represent a novel vaccine strategy. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is the causative agent of SARS (Drosten et al., 2003, Fouchier et al., 2003, Ksiazek et al., 2003, Peiris et al., 2003, Poutanen et al., 2003). To prevent another SARS epidemic, continuous efforts have been made towards the development of a prophylactic vaccine. So far, vaccine studies have mainly focused on the two structural proteins, spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N), of SARS-CoV (Anton et al., 1996, Jackwood and Hilt, 1995). There is little knowledge regarding the immunogenicity of the N and S proteins of SARS-like coronavirus (SL-CoV) that is isolated from horseshoe bats, which are thought to be the possible animal reservoirs of SARS-CoV (Lau et al., 2005, Li et al., 2005, Ren et al., 2006). Since effective SARS vaccines should not only prevent the reemergence of SARS-CoV, but should also provide cross-protection against SL-CoV, we report the immunogenicity of N and S proteins of SL-CoV in mice using a modified baculovirus expression system.

Experimental

Materials and methods

Construction of recombinant baculoviruses

The EF-1α promoter sequence was amplified by PCR from vector pBudCE4.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and the CMV promoter sequence was amplified from pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The gfp gene was cloned into pFastBac DUAL vector under the control of the p10 promoter, designated pFB-GFP. The coding sequences of the N and S proteins of bat SL-CoV Rp3 strain (GenBank accession no. DQ071615) were amplified by RT-PCR and cloned into pFB-GFP under the control of the Polh promoter, respectively. The baculovirus promoters, p10 and Polh, were subsequently replaced by robust mammalian promoters, EF-1α and CMV, respectively. Recombinant viruses (vAc-N and vAc-S) were generated by transposition and transfection using the Bac-to-Bac system (Life Technologies). Virus was further amplified by propagation in Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda) cells, cultured in Grace's supplemented insect medium containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (HyClone). Virus titers were determined by plaque assay on Sf9 cells.

Transduction of BHK cells

Baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells were seeded in 35 mm plates for 12 h before transduction. Culture medium was replaced with virus inoculum and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. After removal of virus, fresh medium was added and cultures were incubated at 37 °C for another 24 h before examining GFP expression under a fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS IX51, Japan).

RT-PCR analysis

Total cellular RNAs from BHK cells, transduced with recombinant baculovirus, vAc-N or vAc-S, were isolated using TRIZOL® reagent (Invitrogen), and were further digested with RQ1 RNasefree DNase I (Promega) to remove residual DNA. cDNAs were synthesized with the MLV Reverse Transcriptase System, using random primers, according to the manufacture's instructions (Invitrogen). Subsequent PCR was performed, using primers specific for the S (nt 21,918–22,208) or N gene (nt 28,433–28,791) (GenBank accession no. AY278741). PCR primers were kindly provided by Dr. GuanYi, Hong Kong University. RT-PCR products were analyzed by 0.8% agarose gel. DNA maker DL2000 (D501A) was purchased form Takara.

Western blot analysis

After 24 h of transduction, BHK cells were harvested by centrifugation and raw proteins were extracted. These proteins were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Protein marker (SM0671) was purchased from Fermentas. The blots were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk powder in TTBS (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 0.8% NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) overnight at 4 °C, followed by 1 h incubation at room temperature with rabbit-derived antibody against SARS-CoV (kindly provided by Prof. L.F. Wang at the Australian Animal Health Laboratory). Following wash steps, the membrane was incubated with AP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Sigma) for 1 h and then developed in AP substrate for 5 min in the dark.

Immunization of mice

BALB/c mice (n  = 5 per group) were subcutaneously and intraperitoneally immunized every 2 weeks with recombinant baculovirus, vAc-N or vAc-S, both at 7.5 × 106  pfu per dose. Mice were immunized four times in total for each condition. Ac-GFP (supernatants of Sf9 cells culture transfected with modified pFastBac DUAL, with gfp under the control of the Ef1α promoter) and PBS immunized groups were used as negative controls.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Sera from immunized mice of different groups were collected before each immunization. The antibody titers for SARS-CoV were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Briefly, 96-well microtiter plates (Costar) were coated with 200 ng per well inactivated SARS-CoV full antigens and incubated at 4 °C overnight. The plates were then blocked with PBS (pH 7.4) containing 1% BSA at room temperature for 2 h. Mouse sera, diluted 500-fold, were added to the wells and incubated at 37 °C for 45 min. Wells were rinsed five times with PBST (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20), followed by a 30 min incubation with alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) (1:5000) at 37 °C. After five washings and a subsequent 15 min incubation with the substrate para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) solution at 37 °C in dark, reactions were terminated with a stop solution, and optical densities (ODs) were determined using a microplate reader set at 405 nm.

ELISPOT assay

Cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV were assessed by IFN-γ and IL-4 ELISPOT assays, using mouse splenocytes harvested 10 days after the final immunization. According to the instruction manual (U-CyTech, Netherlands), 96-well plates were coated overnight with 100 μl per well rat anti-mouse IFN-γ or rat anti-mouse IL-4 antibodies at 4 °C. Plates were washed three times with sterile PBS and blocked for 2 h at room temperature. Mouse splenocytes (1 × 105 per well, in triplicate) were incubated in RPMI 1640 containing purified recombinant N or S protein (2 μg/ml) as the specific stimulating antigens, respectively, for 18 h at 37 °C. Plates were then washed 10 times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 and incubated with 100 μl biotinylated rat anti-mouse IFN-γ or IL-4 antibody per well for 2 h at room temperature. After washing, avidin-horseradish peroxidase was added for another 1 h incubation at room temperature. Following five washes with PBS, individual IFN-γ or IL-4 plates were developed as dark spots after a 10 min reaction with the peroxidase substrate-AEC. Reactions were stopped by rinsing plates with de-mineralized water. Plates were air-dried at room temperature and read using an ELISPOT reader (Hitech Instruments). Medium backgrounds were consistently <10 SFC per 106 splenocytes.

Flow cytometry analysis

Splenocytes were harvested 10 days after the final immunization. Prior to intracellular cytokine staining, 2 × 105 pooled splenocytes/well from different groups of vaccinated mice were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates and incubated for 5 h. A mixture of 5 μg per well of corresponding purified protein and anti-CD28 mAb (final concentration of 1 μg/ml) was added to each well. In each group, as a negative control, 1 μg/ml of anti-CD28 mAb was added without stimulation of the purified specific protein. After incubation, mononsesin (1.5 μl/ml) was added to each well and blocked at 37 °C for 3 h. The splenocytes in each well were then washed and stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD4 and PECy5-conjugated anti-CD8 antibodies for 20 min at 4 °C. The cells were then washed, fixed and permeabilized. Intracellular IFN-γ and IL-2 (both fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated) staining and flow cytometry analysis (Beckman, EPICS ALTRA Idaho, USA) were performed in succession. Data were analyzed using EXOPO analysis software. A minimum of 10,000 events were collected and analyzed for each sample. All of the antibodies were from BD PharMingen. Isotype-matched controls were included in each staining.

Results

Construction of recombinant baculoviruses, vAc-N and vAc-S

Full-length n and s genes of SL-CoV were amplified and confirmed through sequence analysis and further cloned into pFastBac DUAL vector, respectively. Promoters EF-1α and CMV promoted high levels of protein expression in a wide range of mammalian cells, and were therefore used to replace the promoters p10 and Polh in the pFastBac DUAL, respectively. Following transfection, two recombinant baculoviruses, vAc-N and vAc-S, were successfully constructed to express the N or S protein of SL-CoV. The plaque assay resulted in a titer of 8.2 × 106 and 7.5 × 106  pfu/ml, respectively.

Expression of N and S proteins in recombinant virus-transduced cells

Baculoviruses are capable of transducing a variety of dividing and non-dividing mammalian cells with significant efficiency in vitro, which, depending on the promoter used, can result in foreign gene expression (Boyce and Bucher, 1996, Ojala et al., 2001, Pieroni et al., 2001, Shoji et al., 1997, Song et al., 2003). In our study, GFP expression was observed in BHK cells 24 h post-transduction with vAc-N or vAc-S at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) rate of 100 pfu per cell. The GFP signal lasted until 72 h post-transduction (data not shown). The control group, BHK cells transduced with vAc-GFP, also expressed GFP. To confirm expression of the N and S proteins at the transcriptional level, BHK cells were transduced with vAc-N or vAc-S for 24 h and subsequently harvested for RT-PCR analysis. The primers used for RT-PCR detection were designed from Urbani strain AY27874 and the primer sequences were highly conserved between SARS-CoV and bat SL-CoV. These primers were successfully used to detect SARS-like coronavirus in bats (Li et al., 2005) and other wild animals. As shown in Fig. 1A, either N or S mRNA-specific bands were detected in cells transduced with vAc-N or vAc-S; however, no mRNA was detected in non-transduced cells or cells transduced with Ac-GFP. In agreement with the sizes of the S and N proteins of SL-CoV, an ∼180 kDa band was detected by western blot in vAc-S-transduced cells, while an ∼50 kDa band was visualized in those cells transduced with vAc-N (Fig. 1B). No band was observed in control groups (non-transduced cells or cells transduced with Ac-GFP).
Fig. 1

Expression of the N or S protein in recombinant baculovirus-transduced BHK cells (A) BHK cells were transduced with recombinant or control viruses for 24 h and total RNAs were extracted for RT-PCR analysis. Lane 1: non-transduced BHK cells; Lane 2: BHK cells transduced with Ac-GFP; Lane 3: BHK cells transduced with vAc-N or vAc-S. Arrows indicate the specific PCR products. (B) BHK cells were transduced with recombinant viruses for 24 h and raw proteins were extracted for western blot analysis. Lane 1: BHK cells transduced with vAc-N or vAc-S; Lane 2: non-transduced BHK cells; Lane 3: BHK cells transduced with Ac-GFP. Arrows indicate the specific proteins. One out of three experiments is shown.

Expression of the N or S protein in recombinant baculovirus-transduced BHK cells (A) BHK cells were transduced with recombinant or control viruses for 24 h and total RNAs were extracted for RT-PCR analysis. Lane 1: non-transduced BHK cells; Lane 2: BHK cells transduced with Ac-GFP; Lane 3: BHK cells transduced with vAc-N or vAc-S. Arrows indicate the specific PCR products. (B) BHK cells were transduced with recombinant viruses for 24 h and raw proteins were extracted for western blot analysis. Lane 1: BHK cells transduced with vAc-N or vAc-S; Lane 2: non-transduced BHK cells; Lane 3: BHK cells transduced with Ac-GFP. Arrows indicate the specific proteins. One out of three experiments is shown.

Antibody responses in vAc-N or vAc-S recombinant baculovirus-vaccinated mice

We then proceeded to measure the antibody activity of sera from vAc-S or vAc-N recombinant baculovirus-immunized mice. Because an in vitro culture model for SL-CoV was not available, we were unable to directly detect the antibody activity of mouse sera against SL-CoV. Instead, we examined whether mouse sera were capable of recognizing SARS-CoV. The titers from mouse sera collected on days 0, 14, 28, and 42 were determined using inactivated SARS-CoV as the captured antigen. As shown in Fig. 2 , mice immunized with either vAc-N or vAc-S showed detectable antibody responses to SARS-CoV on day 14, and the titers significantly increased following two additional injections. By day 42, both vAc-N and vAc-S immunized groups had an antibody response to SARS-CoV that was ∼9-fold greater than the background (PBS control group). There was no significant difference in antibody titer detected from the vAc-N and vAc-S immunized groups. It should be noted that sera from the Ac-GFP-immunized group showed a detectable response to SARS-CoV antigens, although the response was significantly lower than from the vAc-N or vAc-S immunized groups. This cross-activity was very likely due to “non-specific” antibodies induced by baculoviral antigens, which can also interact with SARS-CoV proteins, because pre-incubation with Ac-GFP completely abrogated such cross-activity (data not shown).
Fig. 2

Examination of antibody responses in immunized mice. Mice were immunized with vAc-N, vAc-S, Ac-GFP or PBS. Sera of immunized mice from different groups were collected before each immunization. The titers of antibodies interacting with SARS-CoV were measured by ELISA. Data shown are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments from different animals.

Examination of antibody responses in immunized mice. Mice were immunized with vAc-N, vAc-S, Ac-GFP or PBS. Sera of immunized mice from different groups were collected before each immunization. The titers of antibodies interacting with SARS-CoV were measured by ELISA. Data shown are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments from different animals.

Cellular immune responses in vAc-N or vAc-S recombinant baculovirus-vaccinated mice

The type of immune response elicited by either vAc-N or vAc-S immunized mice was evaluated by measuring IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion in mouse splenocytes. As indicated in Fig. 3A, the vAc-N vaccination of mice resulted in the highest number of IFN-γ-secreting splenocytes. The number of IFN-γ-secreting splenocytes in both the vAc-N and vAc-S groups was at least threefold higher than that of the Ac-GFP group, and 20-fold higher than that of the PBS control group. As for IL-4 secreting splenocytes, at least a fivefold increase was achieved in vAc-N and vAc-S groups when compared to the Ac-GFP and PBS groups (Fig. 3B). It is worthy to note that the IFN-γ secretion level was much higher than that of IL-4 in both the vAc-N and vAc-S immunized groups, suggesting a strong Th1 bias towards cellular immune responses. Th1 cells can elicit phagocyte-mediated defense against infections; therefore, Th1-dominated immune responses, elicited by vAc-N and vAc-S, may be important for virus control.
Fig. 3

Determination of IFN-γ or IL-4 producing splenocytes in immunized mice. Mouse splenocytes were harvested 10 days after the final immunization. ELISPOT assay was used to determine IFN-γ (A) or IL-4 (B) producing cells. Data shown are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments from different animals.

Determination of IFN-γ or IL-4 producing splenocytes in immunized mice. Mouse splenocytes were harvested 10 days after the final immunization. ELISPOT assay was used to determine IFN-γ (A) or IL-4 (B) producing cells. Data shown are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments from different animals. Th1 cytokine IFN-γ and IL-2 positive cells in CD4+ or CD8+ cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 4A and B, the number of IFN-γ-positive or IL-2 positive cells in the CD4+ T cell population was significantly higher than that of the CD8+ T cells in each vaccination group. vAc-N-immunized mice produced higher IFN-γ-positive or IL-2 positive cell numbers, in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations, than the vAc-S-immunized group. In contrast, the Ac-GFP and PBS groups produced no significant amount of IFN-γ or IL-2 producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
Fig. 4

Analysis of IFN-γ and IL-2 positive cells in CD4+ or CD8+ splenocytes from immunized mice. Mouse splenocytes were harvested 10 days after the final immunization. IFN-γ and IL-2 positive cells in CD4+ or CD8+ cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments from different animals.

Analysis of IFN-γ and IL-2 positive cells in CD4+ or CD8+ splenocytes from immunized mice. Mouse splenocytes were harvested 10 days after the final immunization. IFN-γ and IL-2 positive cells in CD4+ or CD8+ cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments from different animals.

Discussion

Since the outbreak of SARS and the identification of SARS-CoV as the causative agent, much effort has been devoted to understanding viral pathogenesis and to developing treatment strategies. The isolation of homologous viruses from other animal species and the completion of viral genome sequences make it possible to develop effective vaccines, in particular subunit and DNA-based vaccines. These advances will hopefully help to prevent the reemergence of this life-threatening disease. To date, several vaccines have been tested in pre-clinical or clinical studies, including vector-based DNA vaccines (Bisht et al., 2004, He et al., 2005, Okada et al., 2005, Wang et al., 2005, Yang et al., 2004), combination of whole killed virus and DNA vaccines (Zakhartchouk et al., 2005), inactivated whole virus vaccines (He et al., 2004, Spruth et al., 2006), and other recombinant proteins and their fragments. The majority of these vaccines target SARS-CoV structural proteins, particularly the S and N proteins. The S protein is essential for viral infection, while the N protein is important for the transcription of viral RNA. Full-length S or S1 subunit was shown to induce effective immune response against SARS-CoV and to elicit neutralizing antibodies that protect against virus challenge (Bukreyev et al., 2004, Gao et al., 2003, Yang et al., 2004). Anti-N antibodies were present at high levels in SARS patients and persisted for a long time. In agreement, vectors that expressed full-length or truncated N proteins were highly immunogenic (Chen et al., 2004, Guan et al., 2004, Huang et al., 2004, Leung et al., 2004, Tan et al., 2004, Woo et al., 2004). Hence, the S and N proteins may be the most promising vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV. SL-CoV isolated from bats is ∼92% homologous to human SARS-CoV (Li et al., 2005, Ren et al., 2006), suggesting that bats may serve as a natural reservoir of SARS-CoV. Therefore, bat SL-CoV should be taken into consideration for developing a cross-protective vaccine. We chose baculoviruses for gene transfer and expression systems for several reasons. Baculoviruses are not toxic, even at high multiplicity of infection, and are considered to be safe, since they do not replicate in mammalian cells (Volkman and Goldsmith, 1983). In addition, baculoviruses are capable of carrying large DNA insertions and their recombinant forms are straightforward to construct (Cheshenko et al., 2001). Moreover, engineered baculoviruses that contain mammalian-cell activate promoter elements have been demonstrated to efficiently transfer genes and stably express proteins in mammalian cells (Cheng et al., 2004, Condreay et al., 1999, Hofmann et al., 1995, Kost and Condreay, 2002). In order to express the N and S proteins of SL-CoV in mammalian cells, we replaced the primary promoters, Polh and p10, in the pFastBac DUAL vector with other promoters, CMV and EF-1α, respectively. The GFP gene was constructed as a reporter under the control of EF-1α. According to Cheng et al. (2004), incubation of target mammalian cells with the culture supernatant of infected Sf9 cells (1 × 107  pfu/ml) for 12 h (MOI = 50) resulted in the highest gene transfer efficiency, the highest protein expression, and the least impairment to cell viability (Cheng et al., 2004). In our study, the titers of the two recombinant baculoviruses, vAc-S and vAc-N, did not reach 1 × 107  pfu/ml. We, therefore, prolonged the incubation time to 24 h by transducing BHK cells with 100 MOI of recombinant virus, vAc-N or vAc-S. Under these conditions, fluorescence was observed at 24 h post-transduction and lasted until 72 h post-transduction, indicating that the modified baculoviruses successfully expressed exogenous genes in mammalian cells. Previous investigations have demonstrated that both cellular and humoral immunity contributed to the long-term protection against coronaviruses (Sestak et al., 1999). Studies on infectious bronchitis virus (Cavanagh et al., 1986, Kapczynski et al., 2003, Song et al., 1998), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (Anton et al., 1996), and SARS-CoV (Bukreyev et al., 2004, Gao et al., 2003, Yang et al., 2004) showed that immunization with recombinant S protein or plasmid encoding S protein elicited high titers of neutralizing antibodies and provided protection. Our data indicated that mice immunized with either vAc-N or vAc-S produced sera that strongly interacted with SARS-CoV. Since an in vitro cell culture model of bat SL-CoV has not yet been established, we were unable to determine the serum neutralizing activity that was specific to SL-CoV. Given that the S protein is the key protein of viral entry and contains neutralizing epitopes, as demonstrated in other coronavirus studies, antibodies raised against the S protein of SL-CoV will also likely have the capability of neutralizing this virus. In addition to the antibody response, mice that were immunized with either vAc-N or vAc-S also demonstrated cellular immune responses. Th1 (IFN-γ) and Th2 (IL-4) cytokines were examined by ELISPOT and a strong bias towards Th1 production was detected. Our results are consistent with those observed in other SARS DNA vaccine studies (Huang et al., 2006, Kong et al., 2005, Woo et al., 2005, Yang et al., 2004, Zakhartchouk et al., 2005). The balance between Th1 and Th2 responses to an infectious agent can influence both pathogen growth and immunopathology. Th1 cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity, while Th2 cells are responsible for humoral immunity (Bottomly, 1988, Mosmann and Cofman, 1989). The principal function of Th1 cells is to elicit phagocyte-mediated defense against infections, and Th1-dominant immune responses are often associated with inflammation and tissue injury. Humoral immune responses could be induced against virus; however, this type of response alone may not be sufficient for protection and clearing of the virus. T cell responses, especially Th1-mediated cellular immunity, may be a crucial factor for long-term protection. The Th1 cytokine, IFN-γ, can activate macrophages and stimulate the production of IgG antibodies (Wu et al., 2002), whereas IL-2 is required for the growth of T cells and may even be required for naive T cells to produce IL-4 (Powers et al., 1988). In the present study, although cellular immune responses were observed in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, there was a greater number of IFN-γ and IL-2-secreting CD4 T cells detected. Given that CD4 T cells can increase the number of immune memory cells that respond rapidly when re-exposed to pathogens, and thus play a vital role in protection against virus challenge (Bourgeois et al., 2002a, Bourgeois et al., 2002b), the marked increase of CD4 T cell in mice immunized with the recombinant baculoviruses, vAc-N or vAc-S, may prove to be significant in the protection against SARS-CoV and SL-CoV infection.

Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully expressed the S and N proteins of bat SL-CoV using a baculovirus expression system. Mice injected with these two recombinant baculoviruses elicited an antibody response that interacted with SARS-CoV and demonstrated a Th1-dominant immune response. Our results indicate that recombinant baculovirus can be transduced into mammalian cells by direct injection, and such transductions can elicit immune responses. This strategy is considered to be safe, since baculoviruses do not replicate in mammalian cells and do not induce a cytopathic effect (CPE). To our knowledge, this is the first report characterizing the N and S proteins of bat SL-CoV in a mouse model. Because it is adjuvant-free and there is no need to purify proteins, the use of recombinant baculoviruses may represent a convenient strategy for studying the immunogenicity of genes in animal models.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have a commercial association, or other, that might pose a conflict of interest.
  61 in total

Review 1.  Recombinant baculoviruses as mammalian cell gene-delivery vectors.

Authors:  Thomas A Kost; J Patrick Condreay
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  CD8 lethargy in the absence of CD4 help.

Authors:  Christine Bourgeois; Henrique Veiga-Fernandes; Anne-Marie Joret; Benedita Rocha; Corinne Tanchot
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  Baculovirus vectors for expression in insect cells.

Authors:  I Jones; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada.

Authors:  Susan M Poutanen; Donald E Low; Bonnie Henry; Sandy Finkelstein; David Rose; Karen Green; Raymond Tellier; Ryan Draker; Dena Adachi; Melissa Ayers; Adrienne K Chan; Danuta M Skowronski; Irving Salit; Andrew E Simor; Arthur S Slutsky; Patrick W Doyle; Mel Krajden; Martin Petric; Robert C Brunham; Allison J McGeer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Identification of two neutralizing regions on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein produced from the mammalian expression system.

Authors:  Shixia Wang; Te-hui W Chou; Pavlo V Sakhatskyy; Song Huang; John M Lawrence; Hong Cao; Xiaoyun Huang; Shan Lu
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Effective transduction of osteogenic sarcoma cells by a baculovirus vector.

Authors:  Sun U Song; Seok-Hwan Shin; Soon-Ki Kim; Gwang-Seong Choi; Woo-Chul Kim; Moon-Hee Lee; Sei-Joong Kim; In-Ho Kim; Mi-Sook Choi; Young-Jin Hong; Kwan-Hee Lee
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.891

7.  A rapid and efficient method to express target genes in mammalian cells by baculovirus.

Authors:  Tong Cheng; Chen-Yu Xu; Ying-Bin Wang; Min Chen; Ting Wu; Jun Zhang; Ning-Shao Xia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Antibody response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) targets the viral nucleocapsid.

Authors:  Danny Tze Ming Leung; Frankie Chi Hang Tam; Chun Hung Ma; Paul Kay Sheung Chan; Jo Lai Ken Cheung; Haitao Niu; John Siu Lun Tam; Pak Leong Lim
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Antigenicity analysis of different regions of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nucleocapsid protein.

Authors:  Zeliang Chen; Decui Pei; Lingxiao Jiang; Yajun Song; Jin Wang; Hongxia Wang; Dongsheng Zhou; Junhui Zhai; Zongmin Du; Bei Li; Maofeng Qiu; Yanping Han; Zhaobiao Guo; Ruifu Yang
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Aetiology: Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus.

Authors:  Ron A M Fouchier; Thijs Kuiken; Martin Schutten; Geert van Amerongen; Gerard J J van Doornum; Bernadette G van den Hoogen; Malik Peiris; Wilina Lim; Klaus Stöhr; Albert D M E Osterhaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  A Highly Immunogenic and Protective Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Vaccine Based on a Recombinant Measles Virus Vaccine Platform.

Authors:  Anna H Malczyk; Alexandra Kupke; Steffen Prüfer; Vivian A Scheuplein; Stefan Hutzler; Dorothea Kreuz; Tim Beissert; Stefanie Bauer; Stefanie Hubich-Rau; Christiane Tondera; Hosam Shams Eldin; Jörg Schmidt; Júlia Vergara-Alert; Yasemin Süzer; Janna Seifried; Kay-Martin Hanschmann; Ulrich Kalinke; Susanne Herold; Ugur Sahin; Klaus Cichutek; Zoe Waibler; Markus Eickmann; Stephan Becker; Michael D Mühlebach
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  A 219-mer CHO-expressing receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV S protein induces potent immune responses and protective immunity.

Authors:  Lanying Du; Guangyu Zhao; Chris C S Chan; Lin Li; Yuxian He; Yusen Zhou; Bo-Jian Zheng; Shibo Jiang
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Humoral and cellular immune responses induced by 3a DNA vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or SARS-like coronavirus in mice.

Authors:  Baojing Lu; Ling Tao; Ting Wang; Zhenhua Zheng; Bao Li; Ze Chen; Yi Huang; Qinxue Hu; Hanzhong Wang
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-11-05

4.  Chimeric severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) S glycoprotein and influenza matrix 1 efficiently form virus-like particles (VLPs) that protect mice against challenge with SARS-CoV.

Authors:  Ye V Liu; Michael J Massare; Dale L Barnard; Thomas Kort; Margret Nathan; Lei Wang; Gale Smith
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Baculovirus-based Vaccine Displaying Respiratory Syncytial Virus Glycoprotein Induces Protective Immunity against RSV Infection without Vaccine-Enhanced Disease.

Authors:  Sol Kim; Jun Chang
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 6.303

6.  Intranasal vaccination with recombinant receptor-binding domain of MERS-CoV spike protein induces much stronger local mucosal immune responses than subcutaneous immunization: Implication for designing novel mucosal MERS vaccines.

Authors:  Cuiqing Ma; Ye Li; Lili Wang; Guangyu Zhao; Xinrong Tao; Chien-Te K Tseng; Yusen Zhou; Lanying Du; Shibo Jiang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Baculovirus Surface Display of Zika Virus Envelope Protein Protects against Virus Challenge in Mouse Model.

Authors:  Dan Luo; Yuanjiu Miao; Xianliang Ke; Zhongyuan Tan; Chun Hu; Penghui Li; Ting Wang; Yuan Zhang; Jianhong Sun; Yan Liu; Hanzhong Wang; Zhenhua Zheng
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.327

Review 8.  Betacoronavirus Genomes: How Genomic Information has been Used to Deal with Past Outbreaks and the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Alejandro Llanes; Carlos M Restrepo; Zuleima Caballero; Sreekumari Rajeev; Melissa A Kennedy; Ricardo Lleonart
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Characterization of the immune responses elicited by baculovirus-based vector vaccines against influenza virus hemagglutinin.

Authors:  Zhi-peng Hu; Juan Yin; Yuan-yuan Zhang; Shu-ya Jia; Zuo-jia Chen; Jiang Zhong
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 10.  SARS vaccines: where are we?

Authors:  Rachel L Roper; Kristina E Rehm
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.