Literature DB >> 17904942

Comparison of techniques for self-monitoring eating and exercise behaviors on weight loss in a correspondence-based intervention.

Diane L Helsel1, John M Jakicic, Amy D Otto.   

Abstract

This study examined whether different methods of self-monitoring eating and exercise behaviors affect the process of self-monitoring and change in body weight in overweight adults. Forty-two subjects participated in a 16-week correspondence-based weight-loss intervention using a pretest-posttest randomized design. Dietary intake was prescribed at 1,200 to 1,500 kcal/day and <30% dietary fat. Physical activity was progressed to 200 minutes/week. Participants were randomly assigned to self-monitoring eating and physical activity behaviors using a traditional detailed method or transitioning to an abbreviated method. Transitioning to an abbreviated method returned significantly more diaries than using a traditional detailed method (P=0.04). Participants completing the study showed no significant difference in weight loss between the traditional detailed method (-7.5+/-5.3 kg) and the abbreviated method (-7.6+/-5.5 kg), with similar results for intention-to-treat analysis (detailed method -3.9+/-5.3 kg vs abbreviated method -4.3+/-5.8 kg). Weight loss was significantly associated with number of self-monitoring diaries completed (r=0.53, P<0.05). Findings suggest the self-monitoring process, rather than the detail of self-monitoring, is important for facilitating weight loss and change in eating and physical activity behaviors. Transitioning to a simplified approach to self-monitoring does not negatively affect short-term weight loss in overweight adults. These results may have implications for improving self-monitoring in overweight adults during periods of weight loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904942     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  47 in total

1.  Factors associated with probability of personal digital assistant-based dietary self-monitoring in those with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Mary Ann Sevick; Roslyn A Stone; Susan Zickmund; Yuanyuan Wang; Mary Korytkowski; Lora E Burke
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-03-16

Review 2.  Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Jing Wang; Mary Ann Sevick
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-01

3.  Log Often, Lose More: Electronic Dietary Self-Monitoring for Weight Loss.

Authors:  Jean Harvey; Rebecca Krukowski; Jeff Priest; Delia West
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Examining change in social support and fruit and vegetable consumption in African American adults.

Authors:  C W O'Neal; K A S Wickrama; P A Ralston; J Z Ilich; C M Harris; C Coccia; I Young-Clark; J Lemacks
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Do wearable activity trackers have a place in pharmacies?

Authors:  Kathryn Mercer; Melissa Li; Kelly A Grindrod
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2015-05

6.  Defining Adherence to Mobile Dietary Self-Monitoring and Assessing Tracking Over Time: Tracking at Least Two Eating Occasions per Day Is Best Marker of Adherence within Two Different Mobile Health Randomized Weight Loss Interventions.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Caroline Glagola Dunn; Sara Wilcox; Alycia K Boutté; Brent Hutto; Adam Hoover; Eric Muth
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Adherence and weight loss outcomes associated with food-exercise diary preference in a military weight management program.

Authors:  Laura E Shay; Diane Seibert; Dorraine Watts; Tracy Sbrocco; Claire Pagliara
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2009-07-16

8.  Eating behaviors of older African Americans: an application of the theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Catherine Walker O'Neal; Kandauda K A S Wickrama; Penny A Ralston; Jasminka Z Ilich; Cynthia M Harris; Catherine Coccia; Iris Young-Clark; Jennifer Lemacks
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2012-12-14

9.  The Lifestyle Intervention for the Treatment of Diabetes study (LIFT Diabetes): Design and baseline characteristics for a randomized translational trial to improve control of cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Katula; Julienne K Kirk; Carolyn F Pedley; Margaret R Savoca; Valery S Effoe; Ronny A Bell; Alain G Bertoni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Evaluation of a child for secondary causes of obesity and comorbidities.

Authors:  Robert E Kramer; Stephen R Daniels
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 43.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.