OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the 6-month efficacy of Keep Active Minnesota, a phone- and mail-based physical activity maintenance intervention designed for use with adults age 50 to 70 years who have increased their physical activity within the past year. METHOD: Participants (N=1049) recruited in 2004 and 2005 from one large managed-care organization in Minnesota were randomly assigned to either treatment (N=523) or usual care (N=526) with physical activity assessed using the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire, and expressed as kcal/week expenditures. RESULTS:Total physical activity at baseline was similar for treatment and usual care participants (p<0.44) as was moderate/vigorous physical activity (p<0.21). Maintenance of physical activity was higher among treatment participants whose mean 6-month change in total kcal/week energy expenditure was -91, compared to -683 for usual care participants (p<0.002). Mean 6-month change in kcal/week expenditure in moderate or vigorous activities was -49 for treatment participants, compared to -612 for usual care participants (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This phone- and mail-based physical activity maintenance intervention is efficacious at maintaining physical activity at 6 months.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the 6-month efficacy of Keep Active Minnesota, a phone- and mail-based physical activity maintenance intervention designed for use with adults age 50 to 70 years who have increased their physical activity within the past year. METHOD:Participants (N=1049) recruited in 2004 and 2005 from one large managed-care organization in Minnesota were randomly assigned to either treatment (N=523) or usual care (N=526) with physical activity assessed using the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire, and expressed as kcal/week expenditures. RESULTS: Total physical activity at baseline was similar for treatment and usual care participants (p<0.44) as was moderate/vigorous physical activity (p<0.21). Maintenance of physical activity was higher among treatment participants whose mean 6-month change in total kcal/week energy expenditure was -91, compared to -683 for usual care participants (p<0.002). Mean 6-month change in kcal/week expenditure in moderate or vigorous activities was -49 for treatment participants, compared to -612 for usual care participants (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This phone- and mail-based physical activity maintenance intervention is efficacious at maintaining physical activity at 6 months.
Authors: Brian C Martinson; A Lauren Crain; Nicolaas P Pronk; Patrick J O'Connor; Michael V Maciosek Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Linda S Pescatello; Barry A Franklin; Robert Fagard; William B Farquhar; George A Kelley; Chester A Ray Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Lisa H Colbert; Marjolein Visser; Eleanor M Simonsick; Russell P Tracy; Anne B Newman; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Marco Pahor; Dennis R Taaffe; Jennifer Brach; Susan Rubin; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Eleanor M Simonsick; Stephen Kritchevsky; Kristine Yaffe; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Nicolaas P Pronk; Jackie L Boucher; Eve Gehling; Raymond G Boyle; Robert W Jeffery Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Brian C Martinson; Nancy E Sherwood; A Lauren Crain; Marcia G Hayes; Abby C King; Nico P Pronk; Patrick J O'Connor Journal: Prev Med Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Brian C Martinson; A Lauren Crain; Nancy E Sherwood; Marcia G Hayes; Nicolaas P Pronk; Patrick J O'Connor Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2010-01
Authors: Catherine H Yu; Robinder Bahniwal; Andreas Laupacis; Eman Leung; Michael S Orr; Sharon E Straus Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Susan D Brown; Romain Neugebauer; Sara R Adams; Alyce S Adams; Deanne Wiley; Assiamira Ferrara Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: S Baxter; M Johnson; N Payne; H Buckley-Woods; L Blank; E Hock; A Daley; A Taylor; T Pavey; G Mountain; E Goyder Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 6.457