Literature DB >> 14517547

Mail and phone interventions for weight loss in a managed-care setting: Weigh-To-Be one-year outcomes.

R W Jeffery1, N E Sherwood, K Brelje, N P Pronk, R Boyle, J L Boucher, K Hase.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe methods, recruitment success, and 1-y results of a study evaluating the effectiveness of phone- and mail-based weight-loss interventions in a managed care setting.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial with three groups, that is, usual care, mail intervention, and phone intervention.
SUBJECTS: In total, 1801 overweight members of a managed-care organization (MCO). MEASUREMENTS: Height, weight, medical status, and weight-loss history were measured at baseline. Participation in intervention activities was monitored for 12 months in the two active treatment groups. Self-reported weight was obtained at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: More individuals assigned to mail treatment started it (88%) than did those assigned to phone treatment (69%). However, program completion rates were higher in the phone (36%) than mail (7%) intervention. The mean weight losses were 1.93, 2.38, and 1.47 kg at 6 months in the mail, phone, and usual care groups, respectively. The differences between the phone and usual care groups were statistically significant. The mean weight losses at 12 months did not differ by treatment group (2.28 kg mail, 2.29 kg phone, and 1.92 kg usual care). Greater weight loss was seen in men, older participants, and those with no prior experience in a weight-loss program. Heavier participants and those who reported current treatment for depression lost less weight.
CONCLUSION: Although mail- and phone-based weight-loss programs can be delivered to large numbers of people in an MCO setting, additional work is needed to enhance their clinical efficacy as well as to assess their costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14517547     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  48 in total

1.  Weight management by phone conference call: a comparison with a traditional face-to-face clinic. Rationale and design for a randomized equivalence trial.

Authors:  Kate Lambourne; Richard A Washburn; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Jeannine Goetz; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Efficacy of a telephone-delivered sexually transmitted infection/human immunodeficiency virus prevention maintenance intervention for adolescents: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ralph J DiClemente; Gina M Wingood; Jessica M Sales; Jennifer L Brown; Eve S Rose; Teaniese L Davis; Delia L Lang; Angela Caliendo; James W Hardin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  A randomized controlled trial of behavioral weight loss treatment versus combined weight loss/depression treatment among women with comorbid obesity and depression.

Authors:  Jennifer A Linde; Gregory E Simon; Evette J Ludman; Laura E Ichikawa; Belinda H Operskalski; David Arterburn; Paul Rohde; Emily A Finch; Robert W Jeffery
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-02

4.  Treatment of adolescent obesity comparing self-guided and group lifestyle modification programs: a potential model for primary care.

Authors:  Robert I Berkowitz; Margaret R Rukstalis; Chanelle T Bishop-Gilyard; Reneé H Moore; Christine A Gehrman; Melissa S Xanthopoulos; William J Cochran; Delroy Louden; Thomas A Wadden
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2013-06-08

5.  One-year changes in symptoms of depression and weight in overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes in the Look AHEAD study.

Authors:  Lucy F Faulconbridge; Thomas A Wadden; Richard R Rubin; Rena R Wing; Michael P Walkup; Anthony N Fabricatore; Mace Coday; Brent Van Dorsten; David L Mount; Linda J Ewing
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 6.  Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adam Gilden Tsai; Thomas A Wadden
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Internet-based weight control: the relationship between web features and weight loss.

Authors:  Rebecca A Krukowski; Jean Harvey-Berino; Takamaru Ashikaga; Colleen S Thomas; Nicci Micco
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.536

8.  Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers.

Authors:  Mei-Wei Chang; Roger Brown; Susan Nitzke
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Unannounced telephone interviews: A useful and positively received tool in the reinforcement of lifestyle intervention.

Authors:  Hilde Kristin Brekke; Asa Sunesson; Ragnhild A Lenner
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review.

Authors:  Jillian P Fry; Roni A Neff
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.