Literature DB >> 17903646

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women: prevalence, risk factors, and implications for screening.

Brian G Derubertis1, Susan M Trocciola, Evan J Ryer, Fred M Pieracci, James F McKinsey, Peter L Faries, K Craig Kent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurate data regarding the prevalence and associated risk factors for aneurysmal disease is essential when determining the appropriateness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Although women are poorly represented in most large studies of AAA prevalence, the US Preventative Services Task Force recently recommended against primary screening for AAA in women. The purpose of this analysis was to define the prevalence and risk factors associated with the development of AAA in women.
METHODS: A free duplex ultrasound screening was offered to men and women with cardiovascular risk factors or a family history of AAA. Patients were recruited through advertising at local screening centers and screenings were performed between 2004 and 2006. Demographic information and cardiovascular and aneurysmal disease risk factors were obtained for each patient through a questionnaire. A total of 17,540 subjects were screened for AAA, including 10,012 women (mean age 69.6 years) and 7528 men (mean age 70.0 years). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on the subset of women that were screened to determine risk factors for and prevalence of AAA.
RESULTS: Seventy-four aneurysms were detected in women (including four aneurysms >5 cm diameter and 70 aneurysms 3 to 5 cm diameter) while 291 were detected in men, resulting in prevalence rates of 0.7% and 3.9%, respectively. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR]= 4.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98 to 10.54, P < .0001), history of tobacco use (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 1.86 to 5.80, P < .0001), and cardiovascular disease (OR= 3.57, 95% CI 2.19 to 5.84, P < .0001) were independently associated with AAA in women on univariate and multivariable analysis. Women with multiple atherosclerotic risk factors were more commonly found to have AAAs and had a prevalence rate of AAA as high as 6.4%.
CONCLUSION: Although the medical literature suggests a low prevalence rate of AAA in women in the general population, specific risk factors are associated with the development of AAA, and subgroups of women can be identified that are at a substantially increased risk of aneurysmal disease. In particular, elevated rates of AAA were found among women of advanced age (> or =65 years) with a history of smoking or heart disease. These data support the notion that women with such risk factors should be considered for AAA screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17903646     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  19 in total

1.  Smoking, sex, risk factors and abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study of 18 782 persons aged above 65 years in the Southern Community Cohort Study.

Authors:  Eiman Jahangir; Loren Lipworth; Todd L Edwards; Edmond K Kabagambe; Michael T Mumma; George A Mensah; Sergio Fazio; William J Blot; Uchechukwu K A Sampson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Progress in Endovascular Aortic Repair for Women.

Authors:  David Kuten; Zvonimir Krajcer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-10-01

Review 3.  Peripheral Vascular Disease in Women: Therapeutic Options in 2019.

Authors:  Ammar Saati; Noora AlHajri; Lina Ya'qoub; Waqar Ahmed; Mirvat Alasnag
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-14

4.  Non-contrast 3D black blood MRI for abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance: comparison with CT angiography.

Authors:  Chengcheng Zhu; Bing Tian; Joseph R Leach; Qi Liu; Jianping Lu; Luguang Chen; David Saloner; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Genes and abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Irene Hinterseher; Gerard Tromp; Helena Kuivaniemi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 1.466

6.  Comparison of survival rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment methods.

Authors:  Irene Hinterseher; Herold Kuffner; Rainer Koch; Gabor Gäbel; Hans D Saeger; Diane Smelser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The value of surveying the kidneys during pelvic ultrasound examinations.

Authors:  Orlaith Brennan; Sheila Oh; Martin Necas
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-01-23

Review 8.  Biomechanical Rupture Risk Assessment: A Consistent and Objective Decision-Making Tool for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 9.  Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Kevin K Hannawa; Jonathan L Eliason; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.285

10.  Epidemiology of endovascular and open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States from 2004 to 2015 and implications for screening.

Authors:  Kirsten D Dansey; Rens R B Varkevisser; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Chun Li; Livia E V M de Guerre; Patric Liang; Christina Marcaccio; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Brett J Carroll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 4.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.