Literature DB >> 17902856

Developing standards for distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

David M Mills1, M Patrick Feeney, Eli J Drake, Richard C Folsom, Lianne Sheppard, Noah S Seixas.   

Abstract

Characteristics of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements were investigated by comparing responses from two different emission measurement systems in 40 volunteers (78 ears) and making test-retest measurements of each system in 20 ears. For transformation of results between systems, it was shown that the minimum data set consisted of input-output (growth) functions obtained by stepping stimulus levels across a wide range, for each set of stimulus frequencies (1-8 kHz). Linear transformations were considered which involved either recalibration of the emission amplitude (vertical transformation) or of the stimulus levels (horizontal transformation). Horizontal transformations provided better agreement between growth functions from the two systems. For frequencies 4-8 kHz, the means of the horizontal shifts required ranged from 8 to 14 dB, clearly exceeding test-retest variability. The optimal horizontal transformation was derived and applied uniformly to all emission measurements; correlations r=0.81-0.89 were found between transformed emission amplitudes. To minimize the necessity for such transformations and to reduce the variability found both within and between systems, development of standardized equipment and methods is suggested for DPOAE measurements, including: (1) an optimized in-ear probe assembly; (2) use of intensity calibration; and (3) a focus on emission "threshold" measurement and analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17902856     DOI: 10.1121/1.2770543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Rama Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  10-Year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workers.

Authors:  Noah S Seixas; Rick Neitzel; Bert Stover; Lianne Sheppard; Patrick Feeney; David Mills; Sharon Kujawa
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Auditory function in rhesus monkeys: effects of aging and caloric restriction in the Wisconsin monkeys five years later.

Authors:  Cynthia G Fowler; Kirstin Beach Chiasson; Tami Hanson Leslie; Denise Thomas; T Mark Beasley; Joseph W Kemnitz; Richard Weindruch
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.