Literature DB >> 17899437

The outcome of computed tomography in patients with acute renal colic from a low-volume hospital.

L Lund1, U L Larsen, E Anderson, N T Mikkelsen, G Holt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interobserver variability of unenhanced helical computed tomography (UHCT) in patients with acute renal colic admitted into a low-volume hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All admissions with acute renal colic between August 2002 and February 2004 (18 months) were registered. A total of 133 CT scans were performed on patients suspected of having a stone in the urinary tract (< 24 h after admission). All records were subsequently evaluated, the acute CT scans were re-evaluated by a radiological specialist. Interobserver agreements were assessed by means of Kappa analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 133 consecutive patients met the criteria for inclusion, of whom 62 were women and 71 were men. A total of 67 stones in 53 patients were identified. The variability of the radiological diagnosis (doctors under training and one consultant) was calculated, and the Kappa values were +0.66 and +0.69 for stones on the right and left side, respectively. The Kappa values for stones in ureter and the kidney were +0.79 and +0.52, respectively. In addition to stone disease, there were additional diagnoses in 30 patients (23%), out of whom seven had a malignant tumor.
CONCLUSION: In a low-volume hospital with fewer than 100 procedures a year, we found the UHCT method to be safe and reliable with a good interobserver agreement and Kappa value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17899437     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-007-9264-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  14 in total

1.  Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Bong Soo Kim; Im Kyung Hwang; Yo Won Choi; Sook Namkung; Heung Cheol Kim; Woo Cheol Hwang; Kuk Myung Choi; Ji Kang Park; Tae Il Han; Weechang Kang
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Can computed tomography in the protocol for renal colic be interpreted by urologists?

Authors:  Stephen S Connolly; Choudhry Younis; William Meade; Ruth Gallagher; Raymond Lovett; Adrian Brady; Edward Fitzgerald; Eamonn Rogers; Paul Sweeney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain.

Authors:  O F Miller; S K Rineer; S R Reichard; R G Buckley; M S Donovan; I R Graham; W B Goff; C J Kane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  A comparison of unenhanced helical computerized tomography findings and renal obstruction determined by furosemide 99m technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic scintirenography for patients with acute renal colic.

Authors:  Vincent G Bird; Orlando Gomez-Marin; Raymond J Leveillee; George N Sfakianakis; Luis A Rivas; Marco A Amendola
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic--is the radiation dose justifiable?

Authors:  E R Denton; A Mackenzie; T Greenwell; R Popert; S C Rankin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  S Yilmaz; T Sindel; G Arslan; C Ozkaynak; K Karaali; A Kabaalioğlu; E Lüleci
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Impact of CT scan in patients with first episode of suspected nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Michael Ha; Russell D MacDonald
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations.

Authors:  D S Katz; M Scheer; J H Lumerman; B C Mellinger; C A Stillman; M J Lane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.

Authors:  R C Smith; A T Rosenfield; K A Choe; K R Essenmacher; M Verga; M G Glickman; R C Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Incidental diagnosis of diseases on un-enhanced helical computed tomography performed for ureteric colic.

Authors:  Nazim A Ahmad; M Hammad Ather; Jeffrey Rees
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.