Literature DB >> 12675951

Incidental diagnosis of diseases on un-enhanced helical computed tomography performed for ureteric colic.

Nazim A Ahmad1, M Hammad Ather, Jeffrey Rees.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting in the emergency room with flank pain suggestive of acute ureteric colic may have alternative underlying conditions mimicking ureteric stones. An early diagnosis and appropriate treatment for other causes of flank pain is important. The majority of centers around the world are increasingly using un-enhanced helical CT (UHCT) for evaluation of ureteric colic. This study was conducted to determine the incidence and spectrum of significant incidental diagnoses established or suggested on UHCT performed for suspected renal/ureteric colic.
METHODS: Urologist and radiologist reviewed 233 consecutive UHCT, performed for suspected renal/ureteral colic along with assessment of the medical records. Radiological diagnoses of clinical entities not suspected otherwise were analyzed. All other relevant radiological, biochemical and serological investigations and per-operative findings were also noted.
RESULTS: Ureteral calculi were identified in 148 examinations (64%), findings of recent passage of calculi in 10 (4%) and no calculus in 75 examinations (32%). Overall the incidental findings (additional or alternative diagnosis) were found in 28 (12%) CT scans. Twenty (71%) of these diagnoses were confirmed by per-operative findings, biopsy, and other radiological and biochemical investigations or on clinical follow up.
CONCLUSION: A wide spectrum of significant incidental diagnoses can be identified on UHCT performed for suspected renal/ureteral colic. In the present series of 233 consecutive CT examinations, the incidence of incidental diagnosis was 12%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675951      PMCID: PMC153478          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-3-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Urol        ISSN: 1471-2490            Impact factor:   2.264


Background

The application of UHCT for the diagnosis of acute ureteric colic has positively influenced the practice of urology and uro-radiology. The technology allows the rapid and accurate determination of the presence of stone in the urinary tract. Since the pioneering study on the role of UHCT in the evaluation of ureteric colic by Smith et al [1] in 1995, a number of studies have shown the superiority of non-contrast enhanced CT over IVU and Ultrasonography [2-5]. Its sensitivity and specificity is reported to be more than 95% and 96 % respectively [1-6]. An important disadvantage is a higher radiation dose to the patient [7]. Denton [8] noted a difference of 2.5 mSv versus 4.7 mSv in the radiation dose to the patient between IVU and UHCT performed for renal colic. Advantages of UHCT includes rapid scan time, avoidance of contrast related hazards, cost effectiveness, high accuracy, and its ability to suggest an alternative diagnosis for flank pain. This last characteristic of UHCT is valuable in diagnosing many significant diseases earlier in their course, which may be helpful in decreasing the associated morbidity. In this study, we are presenting our initial experience of diagnosing alternative or additional diseases on UHCT performed for the evaluation of acute flank pain.

Methods

The radiologist's reports on CT, CT films and medical records of 233 consecutive patients, performed between July 2000 and August 2001 at a University Hospital for suspected renal/ureteral colic were reviewed. The UHCT were obtained on a Cti/pro single slice helical CT scanner (General Electrical medical systems, Milwaukee, WI). The exposure factors setting were KVp 130 and mAS 200–250. All scans were obtained from the upper border of T12 vertebral body to the lower border of symphysis pubis using 5 mm collimation, without the use of oral or intravenous contrast material. Patients were placed in supine position with full urinary bladder at the time of the UHCT. Additional prone films were taken whenever the radiologist needed a better description of suspected distal ureteric calculi. Radiological diagnoses of clinical entities otherwise suspected were analyzed. All relevant radiological, biochemical, serological investigations as well as per-operative findings were also analyzed.

Results

From July 19, 2000 to August 15, 2001, 233 patients had UHCT for the evaluation of acute flank pain. Ureteral calculi were identified in 148 examinations (64%), findings of recent passage of calculi in 10 (4%) and no calculus in 75 (32%) scans. Thirty-two of the conservatively managed patients were lost to follow up and therefore were not included. In the remaining 201 patients, sensitivity and specificity of UHCT in diagnosing calculi was 99% and 98% respectively while +ve and -ve predictive value was 99% and 98% respectively. Twenty-eight patients (12%) had alternative or additional diseases (other than renal, ureteric or bladder stone disease) diagnosed on UHCT. Table 1 describes in detail the alternative or additional diagnoses.
Table 1

Alternative diagnoses to ureteric colic made by UHCT.

Alternative or additional diagnosisn = 28Confirmation of diagnosisModality used for confirmation
Inflammatory conditions
Cholelithiasis33Ultrasound
Pyelonephritis22Clinical picture/ microbiology
Appendicitis31Per-opearative findings/ pathology
Pancreatitis11Biochemical
Cholecystitis11Per-operative findings/ pathology
Mesenteric lymphadenitis1-Clinical follow up
Spleenic abscess11Ultrasound
Tumors/Mass
Adenaxal mass42Ultrasound
Ovarian cyst21Ultrasound
Renal mass21Ultrasound
Incidentaloma11Ultrasound
Pelvic mass11Ultrasound
Vertebral metastasis11Histopathology
Pancreatic head cyst*1--
Other Urological disease
Uretero-pelvic junction obstruction22Reterograde urography/ diuretic renography
Ureteric stricture11Retrograde urography
Bladder outlet obstruction11Urodynamics

*Patient lost to follow up

Alternative diagnoses to ureteric colic made by UHCT. *Patient lost to follow up In 71 % of these cases, diagnosis was confirmed by the surgical procedure, biopsy and biochemical evaluation (in case of pancreatitis) as shown in Table 1.

Discussion

A wide variety of significant or potentially significant diagnoses can be identified on UHCT performed for suspected ureteral/renal colic [9-13]. Apart from its high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing stone disease, the characteristic of UHCT, which discriminates it from other modalities, is its ability to pick up other unsuspected significant clinical entities. Early diagnosis of diseases such as appendicitis, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, diverticulitis and leaking aortic aneurysm that require urgent and prompt treatment could affect the associated morbidity and mortality associated with such diseases. In a large series of 1000 UHCT for suspected renal/ureteric colic, Katz[13] reported 101 patients (10%) with alternative or incidental diagnosis. Table 2 shows some of the major series published to date on this subject.
Table 2

Incidence of other conditions in previously published series

Incidental Diseases

Genitourinary (excluding renal, vesical and ureteric calculi)Current series 28/233(12 %)Fielding [9] 11/100 (10 %)Marcella [10] 60/412 (14.5 %)Andersson [12] 65/417 (15.9 %)Katz [13] 101/1000 (10%)
Adenaxal masses44111323
Ovarian cyst2-8--
Pyelonephritis2--79
Bladder outlet obstruction1--34
PUJ obstruction2--13
Complicated renal cyst----2
Renal/perinephric hemorrhage----2
UVJ obstruction----4
Renal cell carcinoma/mass2-1314
Ureteric obstruction due to Lymph nodes----1
A-V malformation----1
Renal artery aneurysm--11
Polycystic kidney disease----1
Duplicated ureter---12
Urachal mass----1
Ureteral stricture1-5--
Uterine leiomyma---1-
Obstruction by TCC/cervical CA---2-
Perinephric hematoma---1-
Megaureter---1-
Emphysematous cystitis---1-
Large stone in neo-bladder---1-
Xanthogranulomatous. Pyelonephritis---1--
Hematoma in bladder---1--
Lymphocele in transplanted kidney---1--

Non genitourinary tract diseases

Colonic Pathology----6
Colonic Cancer-14-2
Appendicitis3-675
Pelvic mass/lymphadenopathy1---6
Small bowel disease----4
Porcelain gallbladder----2
Cholelithiasis327--
Cholecystitis1--13
Choledocholithiasis---4-
Pancreatitis1--23
Hepatomegaly----1
Peri-umbilical Hernia---11
Liposarcoma---11
Cervical mass---1
Vaginal mass----1
Small bowel intussusceptions----1
CLL/Lymphoma---11
Crohn's disease---21
Psoa's hemorrhage----1
Rectus sheath hematoma----1
Sacroilitis----1
Bronchopneumonia-1---
Diverticulitis-345-
Leaking aortic aneurysm--11-
Aortic dissection----1
Mesenteric lymphadenitis1----
Spleenic infarct--1--
Spleenic abscess1----
Ruptured spleen---1-
Vertebral metastasis1--1-
Adrenal adenoma1----
Pancreatic head cystic mass1----
Liver haemangioma---1-
Incidence of other conditions in previously published series Among the major series published on the subject [9-13], the incidence of unsuspected clinical entities was 10–15%. The disease pattern is remarkably similar in most series (Table 2). In one report from Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Marcella et al [8] noted an unusually high incidence of incidentally discovered renal cell cancer. There is low incidence of diverticulitis in South Asia and we have found no case of diverticulitis in our series by comparison to other series. It is important that in the absence of ureterolithiasis, particular care should be taken to rule out alternative diagnosis for flank pain. In our series, early diagnosis of pancreatitis, cholecystitis, mesenteric lymphadenitis, pyelonephritis and appendicitis, initiated early treatment. The alternative diagnosis of eight tumors in our series and similar trends in other series is interesting. It suggests that UHCT may change the prognosis in many cases that would otherwise be diagnosed late.

Conclusion

A wide variety of significant alternative or additional diagnoses can be reliably identified on UHCT performed for suspected renal/ureteric colic. In the present series, such diseases were diagnosed in 12% of cases. Unlike most series from the West we did not note any case of diverticulitis.

Competing interests

None declared.

Authors' contribution

NAA collected data and participated in manuscript writing MHA conceived the idea, helped in the analysis of data and participated in writing the manuscript. JR conceived the idea, helped in the analysis of data and participated in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. A 70 year gentleman presented with a three month localized left flank pain. It was mild to moderate in intensity. UHCT showed (Fig. 1) gross hydronephrosis and hydroureter with 1 cm mid-ureteric calculus (Rt. Arrow). Incidentally, hyper-dense bony deposits were detected in the L3 vertebral body (Lt. arrow). Later, a raised PSA and histopathology of prostate biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma.
Figure 1

A 70 year gentleman presented with a three month localized left flank pain. It was mild to moderate in intensity. UHCT showed (Fig. 1) gross hydronephrosis and hydroureter with 1 cm mid-ureteric calculus (Rt. Arrow). Incidentally, hyper-dense bony deposits were detected in the L3 vertebral body (Lt. arrow). Later, a raised PSA and histopathology of prostate biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma.

A 40-year old lady presented to the emergency room with a 12-hour history of severe left flank pain radiating downwards and backwards. She was tender in the left flank and hypochondrium. Her urine examination showed microscopic hematuria. An initial diagnosis of left ureteric colic was made. However, UHCT showed an inflamed pancreatic tail (Arrow). A raised amylase and lipase confirmed the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
  12 in total

Review 1.  Helical CT and ureteral colic.

Authors:  B A Spencer; B J Wood; S P Dretler
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  CT for the evaluation of flank pain.

Authors:  K R Anderson; R C Smith
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Randomized prospective comparison of non-contrast enhanced helical computed tomography and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of acute ureteric colic.

Authors:  J A Homer; D L Davies-Payne; B S Peddinti
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2001-08

4.  Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography.

Authors:  J R Fielding; G Steele; L A Fox; H Heller; K R Loughlin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic--is the radiation dose justifiable?

Authors:  E R Denton; A Mackenzie; T Greenwell; R Popert; S C Rankin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  S Yilmaz; T Sindel; G Arslan; C Ozkaynak; K Karaali; A Kabaalioğlu; E Lüleci
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain.

Authors:  N C Dalrymple; M Verga; K R Anderson; P Bove; A M Covey; A T Rosenfield; R C Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Helical CT scanning: the primary imaging modality for acute flank pain.

Authors:  M M Nachmann; R C Harkaway; S L Summerton; M M Horrow; C L Kirby; R G Fields; P C Ginsberg
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations.

Authors:  D S Katz; M Scheer; J H Lumerman; B C Mellinger; C A Stillman; M J Lane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.

Authors:  R C Smith; A T Rosenfield; K A Choe; K R Essenmacher; M Verga; M G Glickman; R C Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Lumbreras; L Donat; I Hernández-Aguado
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Ureteric colic: new trends in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  M Masarani; M Dinneen
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Sealed rupture of aortic aneurysm in an elderly patient with non-specific abdominal pain.

Authors:  Abhishek Mitra; Harold Horsfall; Ben Mercer; Siva Namasivayam
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-17

4.  Noncontrast multidetector CT of the kidneys: utility of 2D MPR and 3D rendering to elucidate genitourinary pathology.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; Karen M Horton; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-12-09

5.  Acute paraspinal compartment syndrome as a rare cause of loin pain.

Authors:  A Hoyle; V Tang; A Baker; R Blades
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Emergency department non-contrast computed tomography for suspicion of obstructive urolithiasis: Yield and consequences.

Authors:  Ziv Savin; Snir Dekalo; Eran Schreter; Reuben Ben-David; Ismail Masarwa; Adva Cahen-Peretz; Sharon A Greenberg; Galit Aviram; Ofer Yossepowitch; Mario Sofer
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.052

7.  Point: diagnostic radiation: why aren't we stopping (or at least slowing down)?

Authors:  Sean O Henderson
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-05

8.  The outcome of computed tomography in patients with acute renal colic from a low-volume hospital.

Authors:  L Lund; U L Larsen; E Anderson; N T Mikkelsen; G Holt
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Reported and Unreported Potentially Important Incidental Findings in Urgent Nonenhanced Abdominal CT for Renal Colic.

Authors:  Elena Belloni; Stefania Tentoni; Ilaria Fiorina; Chandra Bortolotto; Olivia Bottinelli; Michaela Cellina; Daniele Gibelli; Cristina Rosti; Lorenzo Preda; Fabrizio Calliada; Paola Scagnelli
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  Is an excretory urogram mandatory in patients with small to medium-sized renal and ureteric stones treated by extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy?

Authors:  M Hammad Ather; Nuzhat Faruqui; Sobia Akhtar; M Nasir Sulaiman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.