John F Beshai1, Richard Grimm. 1. University of Chicago Hospital, 5758 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9024, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. jbeshai@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as an adjunct to medical therapy for the relief of heart failure (HF) symptoms in patients with a wide QRS duration (QRSd). Current guidelines recommend CRT in patients with an EF <35%, medically refractory NYHA Class III-IV HF and QRSd >or=120 ms. Previous studies have demonstrated QRSd as a marker of electrical dyssynchrony fails to predict response to CRT. In addition, studies have demonstrated significant differences in QRSd post CRT between responders and non-responders. Moreover, smaller non-controlled studies demonstrated that HF patients with a narrow QRSd may benefit from CRT. A growing body of evidence suggests that echocardiographic criteria may be a better method to evaluate mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) which may predict those that will benefit from CRT, particularly those with a narrow QRSd. The Resynchronization Therapy In Narrow QRS (RethinQ) study will evaluate mechanical dyssynchrony using echocardiography (both M mode and TDI) as an eligibility requirement for CRT. METHODS: The RethinQ study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double blind controlled clinical study. The objective of the RethinQ study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CRT in patients with approved ICD indication, advanced HF (NYHA Classification III), narrow QRSd (<130 ms) and evidence of MD measured by echocardiography. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that patients with narrow QRS <130 ms, advanced HF, and MD as measured by echocardiography will benefit from CRT.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Numerous trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as an adjunct to medical therapy for the relief of heart failure (HF) symptoms in patients with a wide QRS duration (QRSd). Current guidelines recommend CRT in patients with an EF <35%, medically refractory NYHA Class III-IV HF and QRSd >or=120 ms. Previous studies have demonstrated QRSd as a marker of electrical dyssynchrony fails to predict response to CRT. In addition, studies have demonstrated significant differences in QRSd post CRT between responders and non-responders. Moreover, smaller non-controlled studies demonstrated that HF patients with a narrow QRSd may benefit from CRT. A growing body of evidence suggests that echocardiographic criteria may be a better method to evaluate mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) which may predict those that will benefit from CRT, particularly those with a narrow QRSd. The Resynchronization Therapy In Narrow QRS (RethinQ) study will evaluate mechanical dyssynchrony using echocardiography (both M mode and TDI) as an eligibility requirement for CRT. METHODS: The RethinQ study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double blind controlled clinical study. The objective of the RethinQ study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CRT in patients with approved ICD indication, advanced HF (NYHA Classification III), narrow QRSd (<130 ms) and evidence of MD measured by echocardiography. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that patients with narrow QRS <130 ms, advanced HF, and MD as measured by echocardiography will benefit from CRT.
Authors: Sylvain Reuter; Stephane Garrigue; S Serge Barold; Pierre Jais; Meleze Hocini; Michel Haissaguerre; Jacques Clementy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jeroen J Bax; Thomas H Marwick; Sander G Molhoek; Gabe B Bleeker; Lieselot van Erven; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cheuk-Man Yu; Yat-Sun Chan; Qing Zhang; Gabriel W K Yip; Chi-Kin Chan; Leo C C Kum; LiWen Wu; Alex Pui-Wai Lee; Yat-Yin Lam; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-12-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gabe B Bleeker; Eduard R Holman; Paul Steendijk; Eric Boersma; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Steven L Higgins; John D Hummel; Imran K Niazi; Michael C Giudici; Seth J Worley; Leslie A Saxon; John P Boehmer; Michael B Higginbotham; Teresa De Marco; Elyse Foster; Patrick G Yong Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mark S Turner; Rob A Bleasdale; Dragos Vinereanu; Catherine E Mumford; Vince Paul; Alan G Fraser; Michael P Frenneaux Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-05-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nikhil P Joshi; Matthew M Stopper; Jianqing Li; John F Beshai; Behzad B Pavri Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 1.900