Literature DB >> 17899238

Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period.

A Boccaccio1, P J Prendergast, C Pappalettere, D J Kelly.   

Abstract

Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis is a common clinical procedure to modify the geometrical shape of the mandible for correcting problems of dental overcrowding and arch shrinkage. In spite of consolidated clinical use, questions remain concerning the optimal latency period and the influence of mastication loading on osteogenesis within the callus prior to the first distraction of the mandible. This work utilized a mechano-regulation model to assess bone regeneration within the callus of an osteotomized mandible. A 3D model of the mandible was reconstructed from CT scan data and meshed using poroelastic finite elements (FE). The stimulus regulating tissue differentiation within the callus was hypothesized to be a function of the strain and fluid flow computed by the FE model. This model was then used to analyse tissue differentiation during a 15-day latency period, defined as the time between the day of the osteotomy and the day when the first distraction is given to the device. The following predictions are made: (1) the mastication forces generated during the latency period support osteogenesis in certain regions of the callus, and that during the latency period the percentage of progenitor cells differentiating into osteoblasts increases; (2) reducing the mastication load by 70% during the latency period increases the number of progenitor cells differentiating into osteoblasts; (3) the stiffness of new tissue increases at a slower rate on the side of bone callus next to the occlusion of the mandibular ramus which could cause asymmetries in the bone tissue formation with respect to the middle sagittal plane. Although the model predicts that the mastication loading generates such asymmetries, their effects on the spatial distribution of callus mechanical properties are insignificant for typical latency periods used clinically. It is also predicted that a latency period of longer than a week will increase the risk of premature bone union across the callus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17899238     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0247-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  40 in total

Review 1.  Bone poroelasticity.

Authors:  S C Cowin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Long-term skeletal and dental effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  M Del Santo; C A Guerrero; P H Buschang; J D English; M L Samchukov; W H Bell
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Mechanical tension in distraction osteogenesis regulates chondrocytic differentiation.

Authors:  U Meyer; T Meyer; H P Wiesmann; B Kruse-Lösler; D Vollmer; U Stratmann; U Joos
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 4.  Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: diagnosis and treatment planning considerations.

Authors:  Richard Conley; Harry Legan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis.

Authors:  Callum F Ross; Biren A Patel; Dennis E Slice; David S Strait; Paul C Dechow; Brian G Richmond; Mark A Spencer
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2005-04

6.  Mechanical behavior of an osteotomized mandible with distraction orthodontic devices.

Authors:  A Boccaccio; L Lamberti; C Pappalettere; A Carano; M Cozzani
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Distraction osteogenesis for correction of transverse mandibular deficiency: a preliminary report.

Authors:  T S Weil; J E Van Sickels; C J Payne
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement.

Authors:  R Y Hori; J L Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1982-11

9.  Mechanical properties of articular cartilage elucidated by osmotic loading and ultrasound.

Authors:  S Tepic; T Macirowski; R W Mann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing.

Authors:  D R Carter; P R Blenman; G S Beaupré
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  12 in total

1.  Estimation of the retainer height biomechanical contribution in posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a structural-thermal coupled finite element analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Jen Chang; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study.

Authors:  Samroeng Inglam; Siriwan Suebnukarn; Wichit Tharanon; Tratat Apatananon; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Mechanical interactions of cuspal-coverage designs and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing ceramic premolar restoration: a finite element study.

Authors:  Yen-Hsiang Chang; Wen-Hsueng Lin; Wen-Chieh Kuo; Chia-Yu Chang; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The remodeling of alveolar bone supporting the mandibular first molar with different levels of periodontal attachment.

Authors:  Yanfang Zhao; Weifeng Wang; Haitao Xin; Shunlai Zang; Zhiyuan Zhang; Yulu Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Elastic Modulus of Woven Bone: Correlation with Evolution of Porosity and X-ray Greyscale.

Authors:  J Mora-Macías; P García-Florencio; A Pajares; P Miranda; J Domínguez; E Reina-Romo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A model of tissue differentiation and bone remodelling in fractured vertebrae treated with minimally invasive percutaneous fixation.

Authors:  A Boccaccio; D J Kelly; C Pappalettere
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Nonlinear finite element analysis of the vibration characteristics of the maxillary central incisor related to periodontal attachment.

Authors:  Haitao Xin; Yulong Li; Lingcheng Zhao; Weiguo Guo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  Role of mathematical modeling in bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Peter Pivonka; Colin R Dunstan
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 9.  Finite element method (FEM), mechanobiology and biomimetic scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  A Boccaccio; A Ballini; C Pappalettere; D Tullo; S Cantore; A Desiate
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  Substrate stiffness and oxygen as regulators of stem cell differentiation during skeletal tissue regeneration: a mechanobiological model.

Authors:  Darren Paul Burke; Daniel John Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.