Literature DB >> 16321393

Mechanical behavior of an osteotomized mandible with distraction orthodontic devices.

A Boccaccio1, L Lamberti, C Pappalettere, A Carano, M Cozzani.   

Abstract

This work analyzes the mechanical behavior of a human mandible when distraction orthodontic devices are used for correcting problems of dental overcrowding and/or arch shrinkage. The mandible 3D model is reconstructed from CT scan data and meshed into finite elements. The distractor is also modeled. FEM analysis included geometric non-linearity. Displacement field of healthy and osteotomized mandibles are compared. Progressive expansion of the distractor and effects of mastication are also analyzed. Finally, we compare two distraction protocols PROT1 and PROT2 where device is, respectively, expanded by 0.6 or 1.2mm/day. The global displacement is 6mm according to clinical recommendations. It came out that mastication forces generate displacements compatible with bone remodeling. However, parasitic rotations of the mandible arms due to mastication may counteract arch expansion induced by the device. Stress concentrations occurred where the device is fixed: stress peaks stay however below yield limit. Finally, PROT2 reduced by about 10% stresses in mandible and reproduces better than PROT1 the displacement field imposed by the device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16321393     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period.

Authors:  A Boccaccio; P J Prendergast; C Pappalettere; D J Kelly
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effect of thread depth and thread pitch on the primary stability of miniscrews receiving a torque load : A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yushan Ye; Weimin Yi; Song Fan; Luodan Zhao; Yansong Yu; Yingjuan Lu; Qinghe Yao; Wei Wang; Shaohai Chang
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Anionic carbohydrate-containing chitosan scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Hyejin Park; Bogyu Choi; John Nguyen; Jiabing Fan; Sahar Shafi; Perry Klokkevold; Min Lee
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 9.381

4.  Factors affecting stresses in cortical bone around miniscrew implants: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Ramzi Duaibis; Budi Kusnoto; Raghu Natarajan; Linping Zhao; Carla Evans
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  Finite element method (FEM), mechanobiology and biomimetic scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  A Boccaccio; A Ballini; C Pappalettere; D Tullo; S Cantore; A Desiate
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.580

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.