Literature DB >> 17898296

Intersession repeatability of humphrey perimetry measurements in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Linda S Kim1, J Jason McAnany, Kenneth R Alexander, Gerald A Fishman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between intersession test repeatability in static perimetry and the degree of local sensitivity reduction in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
METHODS: Visual field data were obtained from 27 patients with RP using FASTPAC 30-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and stimulus sizes III and V. Each test was repeated at two subsequent visits after an initial practice session. An intersession sensitivity difference was defined for each patient at each measured point in the visual field by subtracting the sensitivity value obtained during session 2 from the value obtained during session 3 at the corresponding test location. In addition, the mean sensitivity value for sessions 2 and 3 was determined at each location for each patient.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman plots of intersession sensitivity differences as a function of mean sensitivities showed that test-retest variability was greatest at test regions with sensitivities of approximately 10 dB, with lower variability at locations with higher or lower sensitivity. The pattern of findings was similar for sizes III and V stimuli. The mean intersession sensitivity difference was +0.26 dB for stimulus size III and +0.45 dB for stimulus size V, representing a small improvement in sensitivity from session 2 to session 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Intersession repeatability of visual field measurements in patients with RP is nonmonotonically related to the magnitude of the sensitivity loss. Therefore, apparent changes in visual field sensitivity as a result of time or treatment should be evaluated in light of the degree of the expected variability at particular sensitivity levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17898296     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Relationship between foveal cone structure and clinical measures of visual function in patients with inherited retinal degenerations.

Authors:  Kavitha Ratnam; Joseph Carroll; Travis C Porco; Jacque L Duncan; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Test-retest, within-visit variability of Goldmann visual fields in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Mian Haris Iftikhar; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Vision test variability in retinitis pigmentosa and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Mohamed A Ibrahim; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Marie Diener-West; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials.

Authors:  Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Willam J Feuer; Sharon B Schwartz; Robert C Russell; Janet D Steinberg; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Effect of Oral Valproic Acid vs Placebo for Vision Loss in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Randomized Phase 2 Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David G Birch; Paul S Bernstein; Alessandro Iannacone; Mark E Pennesi; Byron L Lam; John Heckenlively; Karl Csaky; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Kevin L Winthrop; Thiran Jayasundera; Dianna K Hughbanks-Wheaton; Judith Warner; Paul Yang; Gary Edd Fish; Michael P Teske; Neal L Sklaver; Laura Erker; Elvira Chegarnov; Travis Smith; Aimee Wahle; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Jennifer McCormack; Robert Lindblad; Steven Bramer; Stephen Rose; Patricia Zilliox; Peter J Francis; Richard G Weleber
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Relationship between visual acuity and visual field and its reproducibility in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Manabu Miyata; Akio Oishi; Yuri Fujino; Hiroshi Murata; Keiko Azuma; Ryo Obata; Tatsuya Inoue
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Concentric division of 10° visual field tests in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ken Ogino; Atsushi Otani; Akio Oishi; Masafumi Kurimoto; Takuro Sekiya; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  The Effect of Stimulus Size on the Reliable Stimulus Range of Perimetry.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; William H Swanson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Test-Retest Intervisit Variability of Functional and Structural Parameters in X-Linked Retinoschisis.

Authors:  Brett G Jeffrey; Catherine A Cukras; Susan Vitale; Amy Turriff; Kristin Bowles; Paul A Sieving
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Test-Retest Variability of Functional and Structural Parameters in Patients with Stargardt Disease Participating in the SAR422459 Gene Therapy Trial.

Authors:  Maria A Parker; Dongseok Choi; Laura R Erker; Mark E Pennesi; Paul Yang; Elvira N Chegarnov; Peter N Steinkamp; Catherine L Schlechter; Claire-Marie Dhaenens; Saddek Mohand-Said; Isabelle Audo; Jose Sahel; Richard G Weleber; David J Wilson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.