Literature DB >> 17896842

Tympanic thermometry is unsuitable as a screening tool for hypothermia after open water swimming.

Ian R Rogers1, Domhnall Brannigan, Amanda Montgomery, Nicole Khangure, Aled Williams, Ian Jacobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mass participation in competitive open water swimming is becoming increasingly popular. The purpose of this study was to determine whether infrared emission detection (IRED) tympanic temperature measurement taken in participants approximately 1 minute following a long-distance open water swimming event is a suitable screening tool for hypothermia.
METHODS: We studied 15 males and 7 females who completed the 20-km Rottnest Channel Swim off the coast of Perth, Western Australia. Following the swim, each athlete was clinically assessed for hypothermia through the observation of gait, cognitive processing, and demeanor. Approximately 1 minute following the swim, participants underwent temperature measurement using one of two IVAC Core Check 2090 IRED tympanic thermometers set to core equivalent mode. Further tympanic readings and an oral temperature reading were taken at 5 minutes post swim in subjects triaged to the medical tent after the initial clinical screen.
RESULTS: At 1 minute post event, the average tympanic temperature measurement was 28.9 degrees C (95% CI, 28.3-29.7), while at 5 minutes postevent it was 31.6 degrees C (95% CI, 31.1-32.2). The average oral temperature at 5 minutes post event was 34.3 degrees C (95% CI, 33.7-34.7). The difference between the screening tympanic and oral temperatures was statistically significant (P = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Infrared emission detection tympanic thermometry is unsuitable as a screening tool for hypothermia following a prolonged open water swim because it substantially overestimates the incidence and severity of hypothermia in participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17896842     DOI: 10.1580/06-WEME-BR-044R2.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wilderness Environ Med        ISSN: 1080-6032            Impact factor:   1.518


  5 in total

Review 1.  Accidental hypothermia-an update : The content of this review is endorsed by the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine (ICAR MEDCOM).

Authors:  Peter Paal; Les Gordon; Giacomo Strapazzon; Monika Brodmann Maeder; Gabriel Putzer; Beat Walpoth; Michael Wanscher; Doug Brown; Michael Holzer; Gregor Broessner; Hermann Brugger
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Accidental Hypothermia: 2021 Update.

Authors:  Peter Paal; Mathieu Pasquier; Tomasz Darocha; Raimund Lechner; Sylweriusz Kosinski; Bernd Wallner; Ken Zafren; Hermann Brugger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Risk of hypothermia in a new Olympic event: the 10-km marathon swim.

Authors:  Renata R T Castro; Fernanda S N S Mendes; Antonio Claudio L Nobrega
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Equipment to prevent, diagnose, and treat hypothermia: a survey of Norwegian pre-hospital services.

Authors:  Anders M Karlsen; Oyvind Thomassen; Bjarne H Vikenes; Guttorm Brattebø
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Emergency department rectal temperatures in over 10 years: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Graham A Walker; Daniel Runde; Daniel M Rolston; Dan Wiener; Jarone Lee
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2013
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.