Literature DB >> 17896069

Effect of divergence time and recombination rate on molecular evolution of Drosophila INE-1 transposable elements and other candidates for neutrally evolving sites.

Jun Wang1, Peter D Keightley, Daniel L Halligan.   

Abstract

Interspecies divergence of orthologous transposable element remnants is often assumed to be simply due to genetic drift of neutral mutations that occurred after the divergence of the species. However, divergence may also be affected by other factors, such as variation in the mutation rate, ancestral polymorphisms, or selection. Here we attempt to determine the impact of these forces on divergence of three classes of sites that are often assumed to be selectively unconstrained (INE-1 TE remnants, sites within short introns, and fourfold degenerate sites) in two different pairwise comparisons of Drosophila (D. melanogaster vs. D. simulans and D. simulans vs. D. sechellia). We find that divergence of these three classes of sites is strongly influenced by the recombination environment in which they are located, and this is especially true for the closer D. simulans vs. D. sechellia comparison. We suggest that this is mainly a result of the contribution of ancestral polymorphisms in different recombination regions. We also find that intergenic INE-1 elements are significantly more diverged than intronic INE-1 in both pairwise comparisons, implying the presence of either negative selection or lower mutation rates in introns. Furthermore, we show that substitution rates in INE-1 elements are not associated with the length of the noncoding sequence in which they are located, suggesting that reduced divergence in long noncoding sequences is not due to reduced mutation rates in these regions. Finally, we show that GC content for each site within INE-1 sequences has evolved toward an equilibrium value (approximately 33%) since insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17896069     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-007-9028-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  56 in total

1.  Rapid generation of nested chromosomal deletions on mouse chromosome 2.

Authors:  D F LePage; D M Church; E Millie; T J Hassold; R A Conlon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The distribution of transposable elements within and between chromosomes in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Element frequencies and distribution.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; A Lapid; D Canada
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Recombination has little effect on the rate of sequence divergence in pseudoautosomal boundary 1 among humans and great apes.

Authors:  Soojin Yi; Tyrone J Summers; Nathaniel M Pearson; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Comparison of dot chromosome sequences from D. melanogaster and D. virilis reveals an enrichment of DNA transposon sequences in heterochromatic domains.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Slawson; Christopher D Shaffer; Colin D Malone; Wilson Leung; Elmer Kellmann; Rachel B Shevchek; Carolyn A Craig; Seth M Bloom; James Bogenpohl; James Dee; Emiko T A Morimoto; Jenny Myoung; Andrew S Nett; Fatih Ozsolak; Mindy E Tittiger; Andrea Zeug; Mary-Lou Pardue; Jeremy Buhler; Elaine R Mardis; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Daniel L Halligan; Dimitris Tomaras; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  11 in total

1.  Ongoing transposition in cell culture reveals the phylogeny of diverse Drosophila S2 sublines.

Authors:  Shunhua Han; Guilherme B Dias; Preston J Basting; Michael G Nelson; Sanjai Patel; Mar Marzo; Casey M Bergman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Population genomic inferences from sparse high-throughput sequencing of two populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Timothy B Sackton; Rob J Kulathinal; Casey M Bergman; Aaron R Quinlan; Erik B Dopman; Mauricio Carneiro; Gabor T Marth; Daniel L Hartl; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  Locus-specific decoupling of base composition evolution at synonymous sites and introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia lineages.

Authors:  Vanessa L Bauer DuMont; Nadia D Singh; Mark H Wright; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Urmi Trivedi; Marian Thomson; Fiona Oliver; Sujai Kumar; Mark L Blaxter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  T-lex: a program for fast and accurate assessment of transposable element presence using next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Matthew Carrigan; Dmitri A Petrov; Josefa González
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  DINE-1, the highest copy number repeats in Drosophila melanogaster are non-autonomous endonuclease-encoding rolling-circle transposable elements (Helentrons).

Authors:  Jainy Thomas; Komal Vadnagara; Ellen J Pritham
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2014-06-04

8.  Conserved Noncoding Elements Influence the Transposable Element Landscape in Drosophila.

Authors:  Manee M Manee; John Jackson; Casey M Bergman
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Contrasting patterns of transposable element insertions in Drosophila heat-shock promoters.

Authors:  Robert A Haney; Martin E Feder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Role of HSP90 in Preserving the Integrity of Genomes Against Transposons Is Evolutionarily Conserved.

Authors:  Valeria Specchia; Maria Pia Bozzetti
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.