Literature DB >> 17895692

Crafting Successful Relationships with the IRB.

Jan D Carline1, Patricia S O'Sullivan, Larry D Gruppen, Karen Richardson-Nassif.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical educational researchers face frustration with IRBs for activities that formerly were exempt from review or were not treated as biomedical research with patients. The authors sought to identify methods for improving relationships between IRBs and medical education researchers.
METHOD: The authors conducted interviews with medical school representatives about factors leading to relationships in which all parties feel that their concerns are being met, subjects are appropriately protected, and that the progress of evaluation or research activities is not unnecessarily inhibited.
RESULTS: Successful relationships require efforts at education of the IRB and the researchers. All institutions acknowledged the need to establish and maintain good communication. Some schools developed structures or procedures that resulted in more rapid review and increased satisfaction that interests of all parties were protected.
CONCLUSIONS: A relationship must be crafted between medical education researchers and the IRB. The authors found key elements to successful approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17895692     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31813e66d4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  Education Research and Human Subject Protection: Crossing the IRB Quagmire.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

2.  Variability in obtaining institutional review board approval for quality improvement activities in residency programs.

Authors:  Lisa N Conforti; Brian J Hess; Kathryn M Ross; Lorna A Lynn; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-03

3.  Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.

Authors:  Juliana C Cartwright; Susan E Hickman; Christine A Nelson; Kathleen A Knafl
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  IRB Process Improvements: A Machine Learning Analysis.

Authors:  Kimberly Shoenbill; Yiqiang Song; Nichelle L Cobb; Marc K Drezner; Eneida A Mendonca
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Tavis P Hayes; Jamie C Brehaut; Michael McDonald; Charles Weijer; Raphael Saginur; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.