Literature DB >> 17895419

Spectral transmission of intraocular lenses expressed as a virtual age.

Dirk van Norren1, Jan van de Kraats.   

Abstract

AIM: Currently available intraocular lenses (IOL) have widely different spectral filters. This study aimed to calculate the virtual age of IOL with regard to photoprotection and photoreception, i.e. the age of the natural lens that has similar effects on these aspects.
METHODS: With diffuse solar radiation as a light source blue light damage was calculated for natural lenses at all ages, commercially available IOL and Schott steep cut-off filters in the wavelength range 300-600 nm. Similarly, the input to the short wavelength sensitive cone system was calculated for the range 380-600 nm.
RESULTS: The virtual age for photoprotection of IOL and steep cut-off filters varied from under 0 to 66 years. Most IOL had similar ages for photoreception, and thus show a reasonable resemblance to the spectral properties of the natural lens. Two IOL and all steep cut-off filters had a lower age for photoreception than for photoprotection, and thus outperformed the natural lens.
CONCLUSION: The virtual age of an IOL relates its spectral filtering properties to what happens in the healthy crystalline lens. Many older IOL types offer less protection than the lens of a newborn. Middle age seems a reasonable choice for an IOL.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17895419      PMCID: PMC2001000          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.117903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  11 in total

1.  How much blue light should an IOL transmit?

Authors:  M A Mainster; J R Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Intraocular lenses should block UV radiation and violet but not blue light.

Authors:  Martin A Mainster
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04

Review 3.  A blue-blocking intraocular lens should be used in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Richard E Braunstein; Janet R Sparrow
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04

4.  Blue-light-absorbing lenses and their effect on scotopic vision.

Authors:  Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Action spectrum for retinal injury from near-ultraviolet radiation in the aphakic monkey.

Authors:  W T Ham; H A Mueller; J J Ruffolo; D Guerry; R K Guerry
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Night vision in the elderly: consequences for seeing through a "blue filtering" intraocular lens.

Authors:  J S Werner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Optical density of the aging human ocular media in the visible and the UV.

Authors:  Jan van de Kraats; Dirk van Norren
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Ultraviolet radiation absorption of intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Thomas Laube; Horst Apel; Hans-Reinhard Koch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Do blue light filters confer protection against age-related macular degeneration?

Authors:  T H Margrain; M Boulton; J Marshall; D H Sliney
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Retinal light toxicity.

Authors:  P N Youssef; N Sheibani; D M Albert
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Light damage to the retina: an historical approach.

Authors:  D van Norren; J J Vos
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Spectral transmission of IOLs expressed as a virtual age.

Authors:  David H Sliney
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Ultraviolet or blue-filtering intraocular lenses: what is the evidence?

Authors:  S M Downes
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Functional imaging of mitochondria in retinal diseases using flavoprotein fluorescence.

Authors:  Andrew X Chen; Thais F Conti; Grant L Hom; Tyler E Greenlee; Raffaele Raimondi; Isaac N Briskin; Collin A Rich; Reecha Kampani; Robert Engel; Sumit Sharma; Katherine E Talcott; Rishi P Singh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  Comparison of blue light-filtering IOLs and UV light-filtering IOLs for cataract surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-feng Zhu; Hai-dong Zou; Yong-fu Yu; Qian Sun; Nai-qing Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Blue-light filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) for protecting macular health.

Authors:  Laura E Downie; Ljoudmila Busija; Peter R Keller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-22

8.  Influence of posterior vitreous detachment and type of intraocular lens on lipid peroxidation in the human vitreous.

Authors:  Raffaele Nuzzi; Alessandro Marchese; Giulia Rossana Gulino; Elisabetta Versino; Dario Ghigo
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  The Influence of Blue-Filtering Intraocular Lenses Implant on Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Serge Bourgault; Patrick J Rochette; Thierry Hamel; Justine Rheault; David Simonyan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.