BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Children with congenital hemiparesis have greater asymmetry in diffusion parameters of the pyramidal tracts compared with control subjects. We hypothesized that the asymmetry correlates with the severity of hemiparesis and that diffusion metrics would be abnormal in the affected tracts and normal in the unaffected tracts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with congenital hemiparesis and 17 age-matched control subjects were studied with diffusion tensor MR imaging tractography. Hemipareses were scored as mild, moderate, or severe. We measured tract-specific diffusion parameters (fractional anisotropy, mean, and directional diffusion coefficients) of the pyramidal tracts. We compared tract-specific parameters and asymmetry between the right and left tracts of the differing severity groups and control subjects. RESULTS: We observed many different causes of congenital hemiparesis including venous infarction, arterial infarction, and polymicrogyria. Clinical severity of hemiparesis correlated with asymmetry in fractional anisotropy (P < .0001), transverse diffusivity (P < .0001), and mean diffusivity (P < .03). With increasing severity of hemiparesis, fractional anisotropy decreased (P < .0001) and transverse diffusivity (P < .0001) and mean diffusivity (P < .02) increased in the affected pyramidal tract compared with controls. Diffusion metrics in the unaffected tract were similar to those in the control subjects. CONCLUSION: Asymmetry in fractional anisotropy, transverse diffusivity, and mean diffusivity, as well as the degree of abnormality in the actual values of the affected pyramidal tracts themselves, correlates with the severity of motor dysfunction in infants and children with congenital hemiparesis from different causes. This suggests that abnormalities detected by diffusion tensor MR imaging tractography in the affected pyramidal tract are related to the functional ability of the affected pyramidal tract, regardless of the etiology of motor dysfunction.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Children with congenital hemiparesis have greater asymmetry in diffusion parameters of the pyramidal tracts compared with control subjects. We hypothesized that the asymmetry correlates with the severity of hemiparesis and that diffusion metrics would be abnormal in the affected tracts and normal in the unaffected tracts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with congenital hemiparesis and 17 age-matched control subjects were studied with diffusion tensor MR imaging tractography. Hemipareses were scored as mild, moderate, or severe. We measured tract-specific diffusion parameters (fractional anisotropy, mean, and directional diffusion coefficients) of the pyramidal tracts. We compared tract-specific parameters and asymmetry between the right and left tracts of the differing severity groups and control subjects. RESULTS: We observed many different causes of congenital hemiparesis including venous infarction, arterial infarction, and polymicrogyria. Clinical severity of hemiparesis correlated with asymmetry in fractional anisotropy (P < .0001), transverse diffusivity (P < .0001), and mean diffusivity (P < .03). With increasing severity of hemiparesis, fractional anisotropy decreased (P < .0001) and transverse diffusivity (P < .0001) and mean diffusivity (P < .02) increased in the affected pyramidal tract compared with controls. Diffusion metrics in the unaffected tract were similar to those in the control subjects. CONCLUSION: Asymmetry in fractional anisotropy, transverse diffusivity, and mean diffusivity, as well as the degree of abnormality in the actual values of the affected pyramidal tracts themselves, correlates with the severity of motor dysfunction in infants and children with congenital hemiparesis from different causes. This suggests that abnormalities detected by diffusion tensor MR imaging tractography in the affected pyramidal tract are related to the functional ability of the affected pyramidal tract, regardless of the etiology of motor dysfunction.
Authors: J M Graham; N Papadakis; J Evans; E Widjaja; C A J Romanowski; M N J Paley; L I Wallis; I D Wilkinson; P J Shaw; P D Griffiths Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Yvonne W Wu; Camilla E Lindan; Louis H Henning; Cathleen K Yoshida; Heather J Fullerton; Donna M Ferriero; A James Barkovich; Lisa A Croen Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Miriam Sach; Gerhard Winkler; Volkmar Glauche; Joachim Liepert; Bernhard Heimbach; Martin A Koch; Christian Büchel; Cornelius Weiller Journal: Brain Date: 2003-11-07 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Avi Mazumdar; Pratik Mukherjee; Jeffrey H Miller; Hiten Malde; Robert C McKinstry Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andreia V Faria; Alexander Hoon; Elaine Stashinko; Xin Li; Hangyi Jiang; Ameneh Mashayekh; Kazi Akhter; John Hsu; Kenichi Oishi; Jiangyang Zhang; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Elysia Adams; Vann Chau; Kenneth J Poskitt; Ruth E Grunau; Anne Synnes; Steven P Miller Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Benjamin J Wilson; Senthil K Sundaram; A H M Huq; Jeong-Won Jeong; Stacey R Halverson; Michael E Behen; Duy Q Bui; Harry T Chugani Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Niek E van der Aa; Frances J Northington; Brian S Stone; Floris Groenendaal; Manon J N L Benders; Giorgio Porro; Shoko Yoshida; Susumu Mori; Linda S de Vries; Jiangyang Zhang Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Kai Boelmans; Jörn Kaufmann; Sophie Schmelzer; Stefan Vielhaber; Malte Kornhuber; Alexander Münchau; Stephan Zierz; Charly Gaul Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Maria A Rocca; Anna C Turconi; Sandra Strazzer; Martina Absinta; Paola Valsasina; Elena Beretta; Massimiliano Copetti; Monica Cazzagon; Andrea Falini; Massimo Filippi Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 7.620