BACKGROUND: Identification of haemodialysis patients with problems related to lack of appetite should help prevent adverse outcomes. We studied whether a single question about being bothered by lack of appetite within the prior 4 weeks is related to nutritional status, inflammation and risks of death and hospitalization. Additionally, we assessed associations of lack of appetite with depression, dialysis dose and length of haemodialysis. METHODS: This study is an analysis of baseline and longitudinal data from 14 406 patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Pattern Study. Cox regression was used to assess whether the degree (not, somewhat, moderately, very much, extremely) that patients were bothered by lack of appetite is an independent predictor of death and hospitalization. Logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with being bothered by lack of appetite. RESULTS: The risk of death was more than 2-fold higher [relative risk (RR) = 2.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.90-2.62] and the risk of hospitalization 33% higher (RR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.19-1.48) among patients extremely bothered, compared with not bothered, by lack of appetite. These associations followed a dose-response fashion and remained statistically significant after adjustments for 14 comorbidities. Depression, shorter haemodialysis session, hypoalbuminaemia, lower concentration of serum creatinine and normalized protein catabolic rate, lower body mass index and higher leucocyte and neutrophil counts were independently associated with higher odds of being bothered by lack of appetite. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that a single question about lack of appetite helps identify haemodialysis patients with poorer nutritional status, inflammation, depression and higher risks of hospitalization and death. The study calls attention to a possible beneficial effect of longer haemodialysis on appetite.
BACKGROUND: Identification of haemodialysis patients with problems related to lack of appetite should help prevent adverse outcomes. We studied whether a single question about being bothered by lack of appetite within the prior 4 weeks is related to nutritional status, inflammation and risks of death and hospitalization. Additionally, we assessed associations of lack of appetite with depression, dialysis dose and length of haemodialysis. METHODS: This study is an analysis of baseline and longitudinal data from 14 406 patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Pattern Study. Cox regression was used to assess whether the degree (not, somewhat, moderately, very much, extremely) that patients were bothered by lack of appetite is an independent predictor of death and hospitalization. Logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with being bothered by lack of appetite. RESULTS: The risk of death was more than 2-fold higher [relative risk (RR) = 2.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.90-2.62] and the risk of hospitalization 33% higher (RR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.19-1.48) among patients extremely bothered, compared with not bothered, by lack of appetite. These associations followed a dose-response fashion and remained statistically significant after adjustments for 14 comorbidities. Depression, shorter haemodialysis session, hypoalbuminaemia, lower concentration of serum creatinine and normalized protein catabolic rate, lower body mass index and higher leucocyte and neutrophil counts were independently associated with higher odds of being bothered by lack of appetite. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that a single question about lack of appetite helps identify haemodialysis patients with poorer nutritional status, inflammation, depression and higher risks of hospitalization and death. The study calls attention to a possible beneficial effect of longer haemodialysis on appetite.
Authors: Sagar U Nigwekar; Jeremy M Weiser; Sahir Kalim; Dihua Xu; Joshua L Wibecan; Sarah M Dougherty; Laurence Mercier-Lafond; Kristin M Corapi; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Eric H Holbrook; Dennis Brown; Ravi I Thadhani; Teodor G Păunescu Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Laura D Byham-Gray; J Scott Parrott; Emily N Peters; Susan Gould Fogerite; Rosa K Hand; Sean Ahrens; Andrea Fleisch Marcus; Justin J Fiutem Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Antonio Alberto Lopes; Lin Tong; Jyothi Thumma; Yun Li; Douglas S Fuller; Hal Morgenstern; Jürgen Bommer; Peter G Kerr; Francesca Tentori; Takashi Akiba; Brenda W Gillespie; Bruce M Robinson; Friedrich K Port; Ronald L Pisoni Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-03-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Akos Ujszaszi; Maria E Czira; Katalin Fornadi; Marta Novak; Istvan Mucsi; Miklos Z Molnar Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Charles Chazot; Ken Farrington; Ionut Nistor; Wim Van Biesen; Hanneke Joosten; Daniel Teta; Dimitrie Siriopol; Adrian Covic Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.370