Literature DB >> 18783987

Affective ERP processing in a visual oddball task: arousal, valence, and gender.

Bella Rozenkrants1, John Polich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess affective event-related brain potentials (ERPs) using visual pictures that were highly distinct on arousal level/valence category ratings and a response task.
METHODS: Images from the International Affective Pictures System (IAPS) were selected to obtain distinct affective arousal (low, high) and valence (negative, positive) rating levels. The pictures were used as target stimuli in an oddball paradigm, with a visual pattern as the standard stimulus. Participants were instructed to press a button whenever a picture occurred and to ignore the standard. Task performance and response time did not differ across conditions.
RESULTS: High-arousal compared to low-arousal stimuli produced larger amplitudes for the N2, P3, early slow wave, and late slow wave components. Valence amplitude effects were weak overall and originated primarily from the later waveform components and interactions with electrode position. Gender differences were negligible.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that arousal level is the primary determinant of affective oddball processing, and valence minimally influences ERP amplitude. SIGNIFICANCE: Affective processing engages selective attentional mechanisms that are primarily sensitive to the arousal properties of emotional stimuli. The application and nature of task demands are important considerations for interpreting these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18783987      PMCID: PMC2605010          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  50 in total

1.  Topographic brain mapping of emotion-related hemisphere asymmetries.

Authors:  R Roschmann; W Wittling
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.292

2.  Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory.

Authors:  M M Bradley; M K Greenwald; M C Petry; P J Lang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Spatial frequencies or emotional effects? A systematic measure of spatial frequencies for IAPS pictures by a discrete wavelet analysis.

Authors:  Sylvain Delplanque; Karim N'diaye; Klaus Scherer; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  If it's not left, it's right. Electroencephalograph asymmetry and the development of emotion.

Authors:  N A Fox
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1991-08

5.  Emotional information processing and visual evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  A Mini; D Palomba; A Angrilli; S Bravi
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1996-08

6.  Cerebral processing of nonverbal affective stimuli: differential effects of cognitive and affective sets on hemispheric asymmetry.

Authors:  M B Meyers; B D Smith
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 7.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review.

Authors:  J Polich; A Kok
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions.

Authors:  P J Lang; M K Greenwald; M M Bradley; A O Hamm
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Emotion: clues from the brain.

Authors:  J E LeDoux
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: the case for emotional intensity.

Authors:  F Fujita; E Diener; E Sandvik
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-09
View more
  34 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms underlying the higher levels of subjective well-being in extraverts: pleasant bias and unpleasant resistance.

Authors:  Jiajin Yuan; Jinfu Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Jiemin Yang; Xianxin Meng; Qinglin Zhang; Hong Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Emotional primes modulate the responses to others' pain: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jing Meng; Li Hu; Lin Shen; Zhou Yang; Hong Chen; Xiting Huang; Todd Jackson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Event-related induced frontal alpha as a marker of lateral prefrontal cortex activation during cognitive reappraisal.

Authors:  Muhammad A Parvaz; Annmarie MacNamara; Rita Z Goldstein; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Working memory load reduces the late positive potential and this effect is attenuated with increasing anxiety.

Authors:  Annmarie MacNamara; Jamie Ferri; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The negativity bias in affective picture processing depends on top-down and bottom-up motivational significance.

Authors:  Joseph Hilgard; Anna Weinberg; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-05-26

7.  Gender differences in the relation between the late positive potential in response to anxiety sensitivity images and self-reported anxiety sensitivity.

Authors:  Nicholas P Allan; Matt R Judah; Brian J Albanese; Richard J Macatee; Carson A Sutton; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2018-03-19

8.  The interaction between pictures and words: evidence from positivity offset and negativity bias.

Authors:  Baolin Liu; Zhixing Jin; Zhongning Wang; Yu Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intensified neuronal investment in the processing of chemosensory anxiety signals in non-socially anxious and socially anxious individuals.

Authors:  Bettina M Pause; Katrin Lübke; Joachim H Laudien; Roman Ferstl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? A neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions.

Authors:  C Lithari; C A Frantzidis; C Papadelis; Ana B Vivas; M A Klados; C Kourtidou-Papadeli; C Pappas; A A Ioannides; P D Bamidis
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.