Literature DB >> 17892334

Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation.

Deborah A Small1, Michele Gelfand, Linda Babcock, Hilary Gettman.   

Abstract

Unlike typical negotiation experiments, these studies investigated when men and women initiate negotiations in the absence of overt prescriptions to negotiate. Using a new experimental paradigm, the authors showed that the framing of situations is a critical driver of gender differences in initiating negotiations. Drawing on literature on language, power, and politeness, the authors argued that framing situations as opportunities for negotiation is particularly intimidating to women, as this language is inconsistent with norms for politeness among low-power individuals, such as women. By contrast, framing situations as opportunities for asking is much less intimidating to women, as this language is more polite and role-consistent. Consequently, gender differences in initiating negotiations persisted when situations were framed as opportunities for negotiation yet were eliminated when situations were framed as opportunities to ask. Moreover, primed power attenuated gender differences in aversive reactions to the negotiation frame. In all, the studies presented begin to elucidate the reasons for gender differences in initiating negotiations and further illustrate that such effects depend on the situation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17892334     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Abigail Stewart; Dana Sambuco; Rochelle DeCastro; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

Authors:  Anaïs Llorens; Athina Tzovara; Ludovic Bellier; Ilina Bhaya-Grossman; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; William K Chang; Zachariah R Cross; Rosa Dominguez-Faus; Adeen Flinker; Yvonne Fonken; Mark A Gorenstein; Chris Holdgraf; Colin W Hoy; Maria V Ivanova; Richard T Jimenez; Soyeon Jun; Julia W Y Kam; Celeste Kidd; Enitan Marcelle; Deborah Marciano; Stephanie Martin; Nicholas E Myers; Karita Ojala; Anat Perry; Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas; Stephanie K Riès; Ignacio Saez; Ivan Skelin; Katarina Slama; Brooke Staveland; Danielle S Bassett; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Adrienne L Fairhall; Nancy J Kopell; Laura J Kray; Jack J Lin; Anna C Nobre; Dylan Riley; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Joni D Wallis; Xiao-Jing Wang; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Sabine Kastner; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 18.688

3.  Gender differences in emotional responses to cooperative and competitive game play.

Authors:  J Matias Kivikangas; Jari Kätsyri; Simo Järvelä; Niklas Ravaja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Self-Presentation Strategies, Fear of Success and Anticipation of Future Success among University and High School Students.

Authors:  Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka; Paweł Jurek; Tomasz Besta; Sylwia Badowska
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-27

5.  Thermostat wars? The roles of gender and thermal comfort negotiations in household energy use behavior.

Authors:  Nicole D Sintov; Lee V White; Hugh Walpole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Addressing Stereotype Threat is Critical to Diversity and Inclusion in Organizational Psychology.

Authors:  Bettina J Casad; William J Bryant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-20

7.  Extension request avoidance predicts greater time stress among women.

Authors:  Ashley V Whillans; Jaewon Yoon; Aurora Turek; Grant E Donnelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.