PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether critical flicker frequency (CFF) thresholds are abnormal in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and, if so, if they are correlated with the degree of reported motion and light sensitivity. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The foveal CFF threshold was assessed in individuals with mild TBI (n = 18) having varying degrees of reported light and motion sensitivity. Mean CFF values were obtained using the ascending and descending psychophysical method of limits with binocular viewing at 40 cm. A 7-item, rating-scale questionnaire was used to assess the degree of light and motion sensitivity. These parameters were also assessed in a large visually-normal, non-TBI cohort. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: CFF in the mild TBI group was not significantly different across age groups from the visually-normal, non-TBI cohort. However, mean CFF among the mild TBI subjects was significantly higher for the 'light sensitive' and 'motion sensitive' sub-groups when compared to the 'not light sensitive' and 'not motion sensitive' sub-groups. The majority of TBI subjects manifested both light and motion sensitivity. CONCLUSION: CFF was found to be related to the reported degree of light and motion sensitivity in individuals with mild TBI. Neurological disinhibition as a result of brain injury may be causal of the subjective hypersensitivity to light and motion in the presence of normal CFF.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether critical flicker frequency (CFF) thresholds are abnormal in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and, if so, if they are correlated with the degree of reported motion and light sensitivity. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The foveal CFF threshold was assessed in individuals with mild TBI (n = 18) having varying degrees of reported light and motion sensitivity. Mean CFF values were obtained using the ascending and descending psychophysical method of limits with binocular viewing at 40 cm. A 7-item, rating-scale questionnaire was used to assess the degree of light and motion sensitivity. These parameters were also assessed in a large visually-normal, non-TBI cohort. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: CFF in the mild TBI group was not significantly different across age groups from the visually-normal, non-TBI cohort. However, mean CFF among the mild TBI subjects was significantly higher for the 'light sensitive' and 'motion sensitive' sub-groups when compared to the 'not light sensitive' and 'not motion sensitive' sub-groups. The majority of TBI subjects manifested both light and motion sensitivity. CONCLUSION: CFF was found to be related to the reported degree of light and motion sensitivity in individuals with mild TBI. Neurological disinhibition as a result of brain injury may be causal of the subjective hypersensitivity to light and motion in the presence of normal CFF.
Authors: Theresa Currier Thomas; Sarah B Ogle; Benjamin M Rumney; Hazel G May; P David Adelson; Jonathan Lifshitz Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Tara L Alvarez; Eun H Kim; Vincent R Vicci; Sunil K Dhar; Bharat B Biswal; A M Barrett Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Ann Mansur; Tyler M Hauer; Mohammed Wasif Hussain; Mohammed K Alatwi; Apameh Tarazi; Mozhgan Khodadadi; Charles H Tator Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 5.269