PURPOSE: This study assessed the prevalence of convergence insufficiency (CI) with and without simultaneous vision dysfunctions within the traumatic brain injury (TBI) sample population because although CI is commonly reported with TBI, the prevalence of concurrent visual dysfunctions with CI in TBI is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 557 medical records from TBI civilian patients was conducted. Patients were all evaluated by a single optometrist. Visual acuity, oculomotor function, binocular vision function, accommodation, visual fields, ocular health, and vestibular function were assessed. Statistical comparisons between the CI and non-CI, as well as inpatient and outpatient subgroups, were conducted using χ and Z tests. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of the TBI sample had CI without the following simultaneous diagnoses: saccade or pursuit dysfunction; third, fourth, or sixth cranial nerve palsy; visual field deficit; visual spatial inattention/neglect; vestibular dysfunction; or nystagmus. Photophobia with CI was observed in 16.3% (21 of 130), and vestibular dysfunction with CI was observed in 18.5% (24 of 130) of the CI subgroup. Convergence insufficiency and cranial nerve palsies were common and yielded prevalence rates of 23.3% (130 of 557) and 26.9% (150 of 557), respectively, within the TBI sample. Accommodative dysfunction was common within the nonpresbyopic TBI sample, with a prevalence of 24.4% (76 of 314). Visual field deficits or unilateral visual spatial inattention/neglect was observed within 29.6% (80 of 270) of the TBI inpatient subgroup and was significantly more prevalent compared with that of the outpatient subgroup (p < 0.001). Most TBI patients had visual acuities of 20/60 or better in the TBI sample (85%; 473 of 557). CONCLUSIONS: Convergence insufficiency without simultaneous visual or vestibular dysfunctions was observed in about 9% of the visually symptomatic TBI civilian population studied. A thorough visual and vestibular examination is recommended for all TBI patients.
PURPOSE: This study assessed the prevalence of convergence insufficiency (CI) with and without simultaneous vision dysfunctions within the traumatic brain injury (TBI) sample population because although CI is commonly reported with TBI, the prevalence of concurrent visual dysfunctions with CI in TBI is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 557 medical records from TBI civilian patients was conducted. Patients were all evaluated by a single optometrist. Visual acuity, oculomotor function, binocular vision function, accommodation, visual fields, ocular health, and vestibular function were assessed. Statistical comparisons between the CI and non-CI, as well as inpatient and outpatient subgroups, were conducted using χ and Z tests. RESULTS: Approximately 9% of the TBI sample had CI without the following simultaneous diagnoses: saccade or pursuit dysfunction; third, fourth, or sixth cranial nerve palsy; visual field deficit; visual spatial inattention/neglect; vestibular dysfunction; or nystagmus. Photophobia with CI was observed in 16.3% (21 of 130), and vestibular dysfunction with CI was observed in 18.5% (24 of 130) of the CI subgroup. Convergence insufficiency and cranial nerve palsies were common and yielded prevalence rates of 23.3% (130 of 557) and 26.9% (150 of 557), respectively, within the TBI sample. Accommodative dysfunction was common within the nonpresbyopic TBI sample, with a prevalence of 24.4% (76 of 314). Visual field deficits or unilateral visual spatial inattention/neglect was observed within 29.6% (80 of 270) of the TBI inpatient subgroup and was significantly more prevalent compared with that of the outpatient subgroup (p < 0.001). Most TBI patients had visual acuities of 20/60 or better in the TBI sample (85%; 473 of 557). CONCLUSIONS: Convergence insufficiency without simultaneous visual or vestibular dysfunctions was observed in about 9% of the visually symptomatic TBI civilian population studied. A thorough visual and vestibular examination is recommended for all TBI patients.
Authors: Michael W Rouse; Eric J Borsting; G Lynn Mitchell; Mitchell Scheiman; Susan A Cotter; Jeffrey Cooper; Marjean T Kulp; Richard London; Janice Wensveen Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Nina A Sayer; Nancy A Rettmann; Kathleen F Carlson; Nancy Bernardy; Barbara J Sigford; Jessica L Hamblen; Matthew J Friedman Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2009
Authors: Natalie M Guley; Nobel A Del Mar; Tyler Ragsdale; Chunyan Li; Aaron M Perry; Bob M Moore; Marcia G Honig; Anton Reiner Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Nathan Ernst; Philip Schatz; Alicia M Trbovich; Kouros Emami; Shawn R Eagle; Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Kelly L Pearce; Alicia Sufrinko; Brian C Lau; Luke Henry; Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Jennifer A Gustafson; Jennifer R Fonda; Catherine B Fortier; William P Milberg; Regina E McGlinchey Journal: Vision Res Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 1.984