PURPOSE: Non-invasive imaging of tumour development remains a challenge, especially for tumours in the intraperitoneal cavity. Therefore, the aim of this study was the visualisation of both the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis and tumour regression after radioimmunotherapy with tumour-specific 213Bi-Immunoconjugates, via in vivo bioluminescence imaging of firefly luciferase-transfected cells. METHODS: Human diffuse-type gastric cancer cells expressing mutant d9-E-cadherin were stably transfected with firefly luciferase (HSC45-M2-luc). For bioluminescence imaging, nude mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1x10(7) HSC45-M2-luc cells. On days 4 and 8 after tumour cell inoculation, imaging was performed following D-luciferin injection using a cooled CCD camera with an image intensifier unit. For therapy, mice were injected with 2.7 MBq 213Bi-d9MAb targeting d9-E-cadherin on day 8 after tumour cell inoculation. Bioluminescence images were taken every 4 days to monitor tumour development. RESULTS: After i.p. inoculation of HSC45-M2-luc cells into nude mice, development as well as localisation of peritoneal carcinomatosis could be visualised using bioluminescence imaging. Following 213Bi-d9MAb therapy on day 8 after intraperitoneal inoculation of HSC45-M2-luc cells, small tumour nodules were totally eliminated and larger nodules showed a clear reduction in size on day 12 after tumour cell inoculation. Subsequently a recurrence of tumour mass was observed, starting from the remaining tumour spots. By measuring the mean grey level intensity, tumour development over time could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive bioluminescence imaging permits visualisation of the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis, localisation of tumour in the intraperitoneal cavity and evaluation of therapeutic success after 213Bi-d9MAb treatment.
PURPOSE: Non-invasive imaging of tumour development remains a challenge, especially for tumours in the intraperitoneal cavity. Therefore, the aim of this study was the visualisation of both the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis and tumour regression after radioimmunotherapy with tumour-specific 213Bi-Immunoconjugates, via in vivo bioluminescence imaging of firefly luciferase-transfected cells. METHODS: Human diffuse-type gastric cancer cells expressing mutant d9-E-cadherin were stably transfected with firefly luciferase (HSC45-M2-luc). For bioluminescence imaging, nude mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1x10(7) HSC45-M2-luc cells. On days 4 and 8 after tumour cell inoculation, imaging was performed following D-luciferin injection using a cooled CCD camera with an image intensifier unit. For therapy, mice were injected with 2.7 MBq 213Bi-d9MAb targeting d9-E-cadherin on day 8 after tumour cell inoculation. Bioluminescence images were taken every 4 days to monitor tumour development. RESULTS: After i.p. inoculation of HSC45-M2-luc cells into nude mice, development as well as localisation of peritoneal carcinomatosis could be visualised using bioluminescence imaging. Following 213Bi-d9MAb therapy on day 8 after intraperitoneal inoculation of HSC45-M2-luc cells, small tumour nodules were totally eliminated and larger nodules showed a clear reduction in size on day 12 after tumour cell inoculation. Subsequently a recurrence of tumour mass was observed, starting from the remaining tumour spots. By measuring the mean grey level intensity, tumour development over time could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive bioluminescence imaging permits visualisation of the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis, localisation of tumour in the intraperitoneal cavity and evaluation of therapeutic success after 213Bi-d9MAb treatment.
Authors: Michael Doubrovin; Inna Serganova; Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk; Vladimir Ponomarev; Ronald G Blasberg Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: B Sadeghi; C Arvieux; O Glehen; A C Beaujard; M Rivoire; J Baulieux; E Fontaumard; A Brachet; J L Caillot; J L Faure; J Porcheron; J L Peix; Y François; J Vignal; F N Gilly Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; C Schuhmacher; K F Becker; T K Nikula; C Seidl; I Becker; M Miederer; C Apostolidis; C Adam; R Huber; E Kremmer; K Fischer; M Schwaiger Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: T J Sweeney; V Mailänder; A A Tucker; A B Olomu; W Zhang; Y a Cao; R S Negrin; C H Contag Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-10-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Zain Paroo; Robert A Bollinger; Dwaine A Braasch; Edmond Richer; David R Corey; Peter P Antich; Ralph P Mason Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Julia Fazel; Silvia Rötzer; Christof Seidl; Benedikt Feuerecker; Michael Autenrieth; Gregor Weirich; Frank Bruchertseifer; Alfred Morgenstern; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Enken Drecoll; Florian C Gaertner; Matthias Miederer; Birgit Blechert; Mario Vallon; Jan M Müller; Andrea Alke; Christof Seidl; Frank Bruchertseifer; Alfred Morgenstern; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; Markus Essler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J Stollfuss; N Landvogt; M Abenstein; S Ziegler; M Schwaiger; R Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; H Wieder Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 3.138