Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Percutaneous coronary revascularisation: is it ever worth what it costs?

× No keyword cloud information.

22 in total

1. 5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial.

Authors: K A A Fox; P Poole-Wilson; T C Clayton; R A Henderson; T R D Shaw; D J Wheatley; R Knight; S J Pocock
Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 10-16 Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2. Do stents reduce mortality compared with balloon angioplasty? A critical review of all the evidence.

Authors: Jassim Al Suwaidi; Peter B Berger
Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled?

Authors: T R Fleming; D L DeMets
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1996-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391

4. Predictors of quality-of-life benefit after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors: John A Spertus; Adam C Salisbury; Philip G Jones; Darcy Green Conaway; Randall C Thompson
Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-12-13 Impact factor: 29.690

5. Benefit of early invasive therapy in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials.

Authors: Anthony A Bavry; Dharam J Kumbhani; Andrew N Rassi; Deepak L Bhatt; Arman T Askari
Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6. Drug eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors: C Roiron; P Sanchez; A Bouzamondo; P Lechat; G Montalescot
Journal: Heart Date: 2005-10-10 Impact factor: 5.994

7. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors: Demosthenes G Katritsis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-05-31 Impact factor: 29.690

8. Long-term outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs prehospital and in-hospital thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors: Ulf Stenestrand; Johan Lindbäck; Lars Wallentin
Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 56.272

9. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors: Robbert J de Winter; Fons Windhausen; Jan Hein Cornel; Peter H J M Dunselman; Charles L Janus; Peter E F Bendermacher; H Rolf Michels; Gerard T Sanders; Jan G P Tijssen; Freek W A Verheugt
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 91.245

10. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients.

Authors: Eric Boersma
Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-03-02 Impact factor: 29.983