Literature DB >> 16162880

Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes.

Robbert J de Winter1, Fons Windhausen, Jan Hein Cornel, Peter H J M Dunselman, Charles L Janus, Peter E F Bendermacher, H Rolf Michels, Gerard T Sanders, Jan G P Tijssen, Freek W A Verheugt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy for patients who have acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation and with an elevated cardiac troponin T level. However, randomized trials have not shown an overall reduction in mortality, and the reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction in previous trials has varied depending on the definition of myocardial infarction.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 1200 patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation who had chest pain, an elevated cardiac troponin T level (> or =0.03 mug per liter), and either electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia at admission or a documented history of coronary disease to an early invasive strategy or to a more conservative (selectively invasive) strategy. Patients received aspirin daily, enoxaparin for 48 hours, and abciximab at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention. The use of clopidogrel and intensive lipid-lowering therapy was recommended. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for anginal symptoms within one year after randomization.
RESULTS: The estimated cumulative rate of the primary end point was 22.7 percent in the group assigned to early invasive management and 21.2 percent in the group assigned to selectively invasive management (relative risk, 1.07; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.33; P=0.33). The mortality rate was the same in the two groups (2.5 percent). Myocardial infarction was significantly more frequent in the group assigned to early invasive management (15.0 percent vs. 10.0 percent, P=0.005), but rehospitalization was less frequent in that group (7.4 percent vs. 10.9 percent, P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: We could not demonstrate that, given optimized medical therapy, an early invasive strategy was superior to a selectively invasive strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation and with an elevated cardiac troponin T level. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162880     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa044259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  68 in total

Review 1.  Routine invasive versus conservative management strategies in acute coronary syndrome: time for a "hybrid" approach.

Authors:  Pravin Pratap; Sameer Gupta; Michael Berlowitz; Michael Berlowtiz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Interventional versus conservative treatment in acute non-ST elevation coronary syndrome: time course of patient management and disease events over one year in the RITA 3 trial.

Authors:  P A Poole-Wilson; S J Pocock; K A A Fox; R A Henderson; D J Wheatley; D A Chamberlain; T R D Shaw; T C Clayton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Routine invasive versus conservative management in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Peter R Sinnaeve
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Klaus Fellermann
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-06

5.  Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three vessel lesions: patients should undergo PCI!

Authors:  Volker Schächinger; Christian Herdeg; Bruno Scheller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Acute coronary syndromes: long-term impact of routine versus invasive ACS management.

Authors:  Charles V Pollack; George W Christy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

Authors:  K A A Fox; F A Anderson; O H Dabbous; P G Steg; J López-Sendón; F Van de Werf; A Budaj; E P Gurfinkel; S G Goodman; D Brieger
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Non ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A simplified risk-orientated algorithm.

Authors:  David H Fitchett; Bjug Borgundvaag; Warren Cantor; Eric Cohen; Sanjay Dhingra; Stephen Fremes; Milan Gupta; Michael Heffernan; Heather Kertland; Mansoor Husain; Anatoly Langer; Eric Letovsky; Shaun G Goodman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Monitoring effectiveness of medical therapy in 2006.

Authors:  Ronald G Schwartz; Mark A Kudes
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Relation of Age and Health-Related Quality of Life to Invasive Versus Ischemia-Guided Management of Patients with Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Krishna K Patel; Suzanne V Arnold; Philip G Jones; Mohammed Qintar; Karen P Alexander; John A Spertus
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.