Literature DB >> 17890345

Diversity analysis of dairy and nondairy Lactococcus lactis isolates, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme and (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting.

Jan L W Rademaker1, Hélène Herbet, Marjo J C Starrenburg, Sabri M Naser, Dirk Gevers, William J Kelly, Jeroen Hugenholtz, Jean Swings, Johan E T van Hylckama Vlieg.   

Abstract

The diversity of a collection of 102 lactococcus isolates including 91 Lactococcus lactis isolates of dairy and nondairy origin was explored using partial small subunit rRNA gene sequence analysis and limited phenotypic analyses. A subset of 89 strains of L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. lactis subsp. lactis isolates was further analyzed by (GTG)(5)-PCR fingerprinting and a novel multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) scheme. Two major genomic lineages within L. lactis were found. The L. lactis subsp. cremoris type-strain-like genotype lineage included both L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. lactis subsp. lactis isolates. The other major lineage, with a L. lactis subsp. lactis type-strain-like genotype, comprised L. lactis subsp. lactis isolates only. A novel third genomic lineage represented two L. lactis subsp. lactis isolates of nondairy origin. The genomic lineages deviate from the subspecific classification of L. lactis that is based on a few phenotypic traits only. MLSA of six partial genes (atpA, encoding ATP synthase alpha subunit; pheS, encoding phenylalanine tRNA synthetase; rpoA, encoding RNA polymerase alpha chain; bcaT, encoding branched chain amino acid aminotransferase; pepN, encoding aminopeptidase N; and pepX, encoding X-prolyl dipeptidyl peptidase) revealed 363 polymorphic sites (total length, 1,970 bases) among 89 L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. lactis subsp. lactis isolates with unique sequence types for most isolates. This allowed high-resolution cluster analysis in which dairy isolates form subclusters of limited diversity within the genomic lineages. The pheS DNA sequence analysis yielded two genetic groups dissimilar to the other genotyping analysis-based lineages, indicating a disparate acquisition route for this gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17890345      PMCID: PMC2168189          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01017-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  33 in total

1.  Genetic diversity among dairy lactococcal strains investigated by polymerase chain reaction with three arbitrary primers.

Authors:  I Mangin; D Corroler; A Reinhardt; M Gueguen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 2.  Flavour formation by lactic acid bacteria and biochemical flavour profiling of cheese products.

Authors:  Gerrit Smit; Bart A Smit; Wim J M Engels
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Characterization of lactococci isolated from minimally processed fresh fruit and vegetables.

Authors:  W J Kelly; G P Davey; L J Ward
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Enhanced flavour formation by combination of selected lactococci from industrial and artisanal origin with focus on completion of a metabolic pathway.

Authors:  E H Ayad; A Verheul; W J Engels; J T Wouters; G Smit
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Single-nucleotide polymorphism phylotyping of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Florence Hommais; Sabrina Pereira; Cécile Acquaviva; Patricia Escobar-Páramo; Erick Denamur
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Development of a multilocus sequence typing method for analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum strains.

Authors:  Blanca de Las Rivas; Ángela Marcobal; Rosario Muñoz
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Genotypic characterization of Salmonella by multilocus sequence typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and amplified fragment length polymorphism.

Authors:  Mia Torpdahl; Marianne N Skov; Dorthe Sandvang; Dorte L Baggesen
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 2.363

8.  Recent genetic transfer between Lactococcus lactis and enterobacteria.

Authors:  Alexander Bolotin; Benoit Quinquis; Alexei Sorokin; Dusko S Ehrlich
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Molecular diversity and relationship within Lactococcus lactis, as revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD).

Authors:  P Tailliez; J Tremblay; S D Ehrlich; A Chopin
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis.

Authors:  J R Cole; B Chai; R J Farris; Q Wang; S A Kulam; D M McGarrell; G M Garrity; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  32 in total

1.  Complete genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris A76.

Authors:  Alexander Bolotin; Benoit Quinquis; Stanislas Dusko Ehrlich; Alexei Sorokin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of dairy Lactococcus lactis biodiversity in milk: volatile organic compounds as discriminating markers.

Authors:  Amandine Dhaisne; Maeva Guellerin; Valérie Laroute; Sandrine Laguerre; Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet; Pascal Le Bourgeois; Pascal Loubiere
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Diversity in robustness of Lactococcus lactis strains during heat stress, oxidative stress, and spray drying stress.

Authors:  Annereinou R Dijkstra; Meily C Setyawati; Jumamurat R Bayjanov; Wynand Alkema; Sacha A F T van Hijum; Peter A Bron; Jeroen Hugenholtz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Regulatory phenotyping reveals important diversity within the species Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Herwig Bachmann; Marjo J C Starrenburg; Annereinou Dijkstra; Douwe Molenaar; Michiel Kleerebezem; Jan L W Rademaker; Johan E T van Hylckama Vlieg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evaluation of Lactococcus lactis Isolates from Nondairy Sources with Potential Dairy Applications Reveals Extensive Phenotype-Genotype Disparity and Implications for a Revised Species.

Authors:  Daniel Cavanagh; Aidan Casey; Eric Altermann; Paul D Cotter; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Olivia McAuliffe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Selection of enhanced antimicrobial activity posing lactic acid bacteria characterised by (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting.

Authors:  Joana Šalomskienė; Asta Abraitienė; Dovilė Jonkuvienė; Irena Mačionienė; Jūratė Repečkienė
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  High-resolution amplified fragment length polymorphism typing of Lactococcus lactis strains enables identification of genetic markers for subspecies-related phenotypes.

Authors:  Oylum Erkus Kütahya; Marjo J C Starrenburg; Jan L W Rademaker; Corné H W Klaassen; Johan E T van Hylckama Vlieg; Eddy J Smid; Michiel Kleerebezem
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Chromosomal diversity in Lactococcus lactis and the origin of dairy starter cultures.

Authors:  William J Kelly; Lawrence J H Ward; Sinead C Leahy
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  PanCGH: a genotype-calling algorithm for pangenome CGH data.

Authors:  Jumamurat R Bayjanov; Michiel Wels; Marjo Starrenburg; Johan E T van Hylckama Vlieg; Roland J Siezen; Douwe Molenaar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  The proteolytic system of lactic acid bacteria revisited: a genomic comparison.

Authors:  Mengjin Liu; Jumamurat R Bayjanov; Bernadet Renckens; Arjen Nauta; Roland J Siezen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.